Official Packers -vs- Vikings game thread

[Rastak]

Bad decision to go for two there. I don't care what the chart says.

Why?

down by 5.

What makes you dislike that call? They make it it's down by 3.

[Bretsky]

Bad decision to go for two there. I don't care what the chart says.

why???

that is the textbook situation to go for 2. What does 1 give them at all?

we kick a field goal and now it's 8

Before it's a TD to tie the game

[Fosco33]

Vikes have more 1st downs, yards (w/o the return by Will), and less penalty yards...

Need a really long slow TD drive to get this in our court...

[Brando19]

Bad decision to go for two there. I don't care what the chart says.

how does one point do anything for them?

ummmm....wins games.

[Lurker64]

Bad decision to go for two there. I don't care what the chart says.

why???

that is the textbook situation to go for 2. What does 1 give them at all?

You stand a better chance of getting two points by kicking two extra points than by going for two twice. It's just a terribly low percentage play, and Minnesota should be playing assuming that Green Bay can score again and that they need to score another TD to win.

[Rastak]

I hate a nailbiter...i want a Packer blowout.

I want to win a lottery.....

[Carolina_Packer]

Bad decision to go for two there. I don't care what the chart says.

why???

that is the textbook situation to go for 2. What does 1 give them at all?

Then that's two risky calls in a row including the going for it on 4th instead of taking the FG attempt. At least they got the TD, I guess. Would have had the 2 if TJ had any accuracy.

[Rastak]

Bad decision to go for two there. I don't care what the chart says.

why???

that is the textbook situation to go for 2. What does 1 give them at all?

You stand a better chance of getting two points by kicking two extra points than by going for two twice. It's just a terribly low percentage play, and Minnesota should be playing assuming that Green Bay can score again and that they need to score another TD to win.

Why? They gave up a big play but have played it pretty tough overall.....

[Lurker64]

That blocked FG at the half is looming kind of large now, but at least we still have the lead and the ball.

[Badgerinmaine]

I think Minn. made the right call in going for two, but the thinking on going for one could be that if the Packers kick a FG, then you'd be down 20-13 and can tied the game without having to go for two (or play for the win) But like I said, they made the right call but just didn't execute.

[The Gunshooter]

Dare I say no turnovers so far?

[Gunakor]

God it would be nice to be able to pound the rock here. Figure something out MM. Gotta get it going on the ground somehow.

[Badgerinmaine]

I hate a nailbiter...i want a Packer blowout.

I want to win a lottery.....

I want a five dollar bill every time Tony says "Favre".

[Rastak]

Dare I say no turnovers so far?

Say it!

[Badgerinmaine]

Dare I say no turnovers so far?

Shhh!