Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Let's be fair: Rodgers was ready
Collapse
X
-
What do you mean it wasn't really his first team? What other NFL team did he play for before the Bucs? The USFL was not the NFL. Success in the USFL did not mean success in the NFL anymore than success at an elite NCAA school ensures success in the NFL. All it did was make him a great prospect.
-
Originally posted by Harlan HucklebyCensorship and moving threads should be done as a last resort. Not as a way to demonstrate total authority. I guess this is RetailGuy on the loose?
Just be glad you're not a mod, and on the receiving end of a bunch of complaints about moron's like you and I screwing up the forum. And they have to be nice to everybody - including the people who really don't deserve it. I don't think it matters whether or not we agree with every little thing they do, but I at least appreciate they they do all the dirty work around here.
Comment
-
Patler,
The theme of the thread was failures with their first team...there was no mention of league.
So, i was just saying he wasn't a failure with his first team. He was a failure with his second team.
As for the USFL...that was a pretty decent league. They lured a ton of top talent. The problem wasn't the top talent...it was depth. That is what separated them.
For example young passed to NFL wr townsell on the express.
Comment
-
speak for yourself. I don't screw up the forum.Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by Harlan HucklebyCensorship and moving threads should be done as a last resort. Not as a way to demonstrate total authority. I guess this is RetailGuy on the loose?
Just be glad you're not a mod, and on the receiving end of a bunch of complaints about moron's like you and I screwing up the forum. And they have to be nice to everybody - including the people who really don't deserve it. I don't think it matters whether or not we agree with every little thing they do, but I at least appreciate they they do all the dirty work around here.
and I don't agree that deleting posts that are critical of censorship amounts to doing "dirty work" for the forum. I call it thin-skinned, and counter-productive.
Comment
-
Then no highly tauted draft pick qualifies because each and every one of them was a success with a major college team. After all, in your logic, the league doesn't count. How about the CFL, or NFL-E?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsPatler,
The theme of the thread was failures with their first team...there was no mention of league.
So, i was just saying he wasn't a failure with his first team. He was a failure with his second team.
As for the USFL...that was a pretty decent league. They lured a ton of top talent. The problem wasn't the top talent...it was depth. That is what separated them.
For example young passed to NFL wr townsell on the express.
The USFL had some good players and some good teams, but it in no way shape or form compared to the NFL.
Comment
-
the forum can survive criticism. aggressive censorship screws-up a forum.Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by Harlan Hucklebyspeak for yourself. I don't screw up the forum.
Well that's odd. I wonder why your post was deleted instead of mine then. Hmmmm. Maybe it was a clerical error.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patler
Then no highly tauted draft pick qualifies because each and every one of them was a success with a major college team. After all, in your logic, the league doesn't count. How about the CFL, or NFL-E?
Or pee wee team for that matter.
Were in a Packer forum. The default value should be the NFL.
Comment
-
College isn't a pro team.Originally posted by PatlerThen no highly tauted draft pick qualifies because each and every one of them was a success with a major college team. After all, in your logic, the league doesn't count. How about the CFL, or NFL-E?Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsPatler,
The theme of the thread was failures with their first team...there was no mention of league.
So, i was just saying he wasn't a failure with his first team. He was a failure with his second team.
As for the USFL...that was a pretty decent league. They lured a ton of top talent. The problem wasn't the top talent...it was depth. That is what separated them.
For example young passed to NFL wr townsell on the express.
The USFL had some good players and some good teams, but it in no way shape or form compared to the NFL.
CFL..canadian..not the same rules, and not set up to compete. E..minor leagues.
The USFL had tons of NFL players. On Young's 84 team..there were 29 NFL players. And, the best USFL teams could imho play with the worst NFL.
We can agree to disagree.
Comment
-
I agree with Harlan here. Who the hell deleted his post? It was harmless. WTF!Originally posted by Scott CampbellAgreed, and agreed. I think both of those are allowed to flourish here. Mad gives you a lot longer leash than I would.Originally posted by Harlan Hucklebythe forum can survive criticism. aggressive censorship screws-up a forum."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
The only forums I've seen (since I started participating in 1997) die a slow, boring death were ones that had censorship.
The biggest ones that I am still a member of today are ones that, for the most part, let the contributors police the boards themselves.
Allowing personalities, strangely enough, is the heartbeat behind a forum. Content, contributions, etc ... that's what get people here in the first place. I've founded and ran some big ones when I worked at GameSpy (NBA-Live.com, Maddencentral.com, FOFCentral, all the PlanetWhatever.com's -- I think all our still huge and active ?) and that's a characteristic I've seen across the board.
Comment
-
I don't think there was anything sinister about it (unlike Harlan), but I think a mod made a mistake removing it. It was probably Zool. He has an itchy trigger finger."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment


Comment