Tweet
go get em.. there is a our Witten! make us a real threat THIS YEAR!
-
go get em.. there is a our Witten! make us a real threat THIS YEAR! -
a 3rd rounder wouldnt be bad for Gonzo.Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship. -
It is exactly the kind of move Ted would not make.
Comment
-
I'm fine with the TE's on our roster right now. Adding Gonzo would improve our offense, but not by a huge amount. Certainly not enough that it would make us a better contender than we already are. The offensive improvement would not be worth the cost. TE's haven't been a huge part of the Packer offense for a couple years now.Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to growComment
-
I disagree. This is the kind of great NFL player TT would want and be willing to pay for.Originally posted by CaliforniaCheez
I could see a 2nd easy.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.Comment
-
Not sure of contract and age, but would be exactly what the Vikes could use. I'd be up for that if no more than a 2nd.Comment
-
Will Tony Gonzalez block better from the backfield in shotgun than Donald Lee?
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.Comment
-
I think that the main reason that TEs haven't been a major part of our offense is that we haven't had anyone better than average. An athlete that is 6'6" 260 has balance, good hands, and can run is very hard to find. And alot of them are playing in the NBA.Originally posted by Gunakor
Because of his age and the fact that we just drafted a TE I don't know if this hypothetical tradew will happen. But, he would radically change our offense. Often times now teams play him with two defenders. If they wanted to do that then what about Donald or Greg? One of those three would put up big numbers every game.
Are running game might even improve because one safety is going to have to play back to watch out for him.Comment
-
Could we be looking to trade for a CB after this weekends game? I have always liked Gonzo but is this the biggest need at this time? Maybe...?
C.H.U.D.Comment
-
You beat me to it. This would be an un-Packer-like move; We're fine at TE right now; And I'm not sure Gonzales hasn't lost a step or two or three. And undoubtedly, he isn't gonna be as cheap as a 3rd or 4th.Originally posted by CaliforniaCheezWhat could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?Comment
-
Gonzo is a dude that could rack up over 100 catches in a good offense.. he'd make is unpredictable in the pass game and very, very deep with talent...
maybe people are forgetting the 50 first downs witten caught on 3rd down last week... those players are difference makers NOT D Lee or J Jone...Comment
-
But you don't go after a player at a postition where you are covered vs. the secondary which is a M.A.S.H. unit. If you are going to trade for someone, you trade for a CB or S. Don't need Gonzalez.Originally posted by Pacopete4Comment
-
if you can name me a CB out there that is the equal talent of Gonzo... I'll say go for it but I don't think there is....
side note, we are NOT ok at TE... D. Lee is average at best and Sir Humpsalot is just... eh
anothe side note, would u like to be OK at a position or have a Witten type player like the cowboys do?... all I can get outta my head is 3rd and 6... FIRST DOWN JASON WITTEN!... movin the chains keeps ur D off t he field too...Comment
-
As another poster said, and I agree with, I am fine with the TE we have. The secondary is the bigger issue right now. That should be the focus.Originally posted by Pacopete4Comment
-
you trade for quality players that are available, not ones that are not.Originally posted by cpk1994The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince LombardiComment
Comment