Personally great news that Al is coming back after the bye. Do I think Al is the lockdown corner he thinks he is. NOT ANYMORE. I jestfully hung with some buddies this weekend and referred to Al Harris as "Big Game Al" which got some hilarious retributes from hardcore Packer fans. All agreed with the Big Game Al joke.
Al is very good, but on the biggest games we relied on him last year he failed (TO-Dallas, Plaxico-NFC championship game). I'm not dissing Al, but his best games are behind him as seems pretty ego-driven and lacking major speed and now injured and only getting older at an ancient 34 at CB. He was timed at 4.63 at his fastest when he was younger in his 20's and LB's can run faster than him now (well all the Packer starter LB's for that matter).
Granted speed isn't his best attribute (he's a scrapper and good at it) and I DO like Al as a player as he's a tough SOB with attitude but we've done VERY well without him.
T-Will's 4.3 speed has made a difference as has his shadowing ability of opposing WR's and his crazy catch up speed (I remember two plays where others got burnt this year where he appeared out of nowhere to save the TD resulting in FG's).
Al could not do that. Am I saying T-Will is better than AL at this point. Possibly. Are they so close that I would start T-Will until Al proves he's healthy? YES.
Proof? Well here's numbers thus far this year:
51.7 completion %, 186 yards/game, 9 TDs, 13 interceptions, 5.0 yards allowed/pass play
T-Will has shown he's worth a 5 year deal if we are lucky with TT for a reasonable contract. Al's best days are behind him. Keep Al but groom and give T-Will his spot now.
Al is very good, but on the biggest games we relied on him last year he failed (TO-Dallas, Plaxico-NFC championship game). I'm not dissing Al, but his best games are behind him as seems pretty ego-driven and lacking major speed and now injured and only getting older at an ancient 34 at CB. He was timed at 4.63 at his fastest when he was younger in his 20's and LB's can run faster than him now (well all the Packer starter LB's for that matter).
Granted speed isn't his best attribute (he's a scrapper and good at it) and I DO like Al as a player as he's a tough SOB with attitude but we've done VERY well without him.
T-Will's 4.3 speed has made a difference as has his shadowing ability of opposing WR's and his crazy catch up speed (I remember two plays where others got burnt this year where he appeared out of nowhere to save the TD resulting in FG's).
Al could not do that. Am I saying T-Will is better than AL at this point. Possibly. Are they so close that I would start T-Will until Al proves he's healthy? YES.
Proof? Well here's numbers thus far this year:
51.7 completion %, 186 yards/game, 9 TDs, 13 interceptions, 5.0 yards allowed/pass play
T-Will has shown he's worth a 5 year deal if we are lucky with TT for a reasonable contract. Al's best days are behind him. Keep Al but groom and give T-Will his spot now.

Comment