Boy OH Boy

[Partial]

I don't understand why they keep loading up talent at WR if they don't intend to play them.

I don't see the problem.

They drafted a WR in Nelson that was an improvement over what they had on the roster. Jones was an improvement over what they had a year ago. Jennings an improvement over what htey had two years ago. Murphy an improvement (except for the injury) over what they had three years ago.

Because building a competitive team requires balance. If they keep drafting receivers that are an improvement year after year... sure, they'll be great and loaded with first rounds pick 1-5 at wideout... but they'll have a weakness elsewhere.

After the ridiculous year we put up offensively through the air last year, I didn't like the pick of Jordy. I'm ok with it now since he looks like he'll be a good player, but at the same time they're having a good player sitting on the bench in Jones right now while having to play some average guys at other spots.

TT has a unquestionable knack for finding talent. Hopefully over the years he becomes better at spreading that talent across the team. Not saying thats it bad, but if he can master this art he'll be one of the best

[cpk1994]

It's hard to fathom - Jones was the #3WR last year. How does he go from #3 to not being dressed?

MM must be reading this forum.

If thats the case, how is Ruvell not #1?

[sharpe1027]

Ruvell is also a very tall target who can go up and get the ball in traffic. (which is really saying about the same thing, but still...)

Ruvell might be the best blocking WR we have. They seem to run alot with him in there.

[oregonpackfan]

Ruvell is also a very tall target who can go up and get the ball in traffic. (which is really saying about the same thing, but still...)

Ruvell might be the best blocking WR we have. They seem to run alot with him in there.

I agree with this point. Many fans look at receivers solely as pass-catchers. They forget that blocking is also a crucial part of playing receiver.

Martin has established himself as an effective downfield blocker.

[Bretsky]

Ruvell is also a very tall target who can go up and get the ball in traffic. (which is really saying about the same thing, but still...)

I don't remember that many battles like that he has won.

He may be our best blocking WR though

[sharpe1027]

Because building a competitive team requires balance. If they keep drafting receivers that are an improvement year after year... sure, they'll be great and loaded with first rounds pick 1-5 at wideout... but they'll have a weakness elsewhere.

After the ridiculous year we put up offensively through the air last year, I didn't like the pick of Jordy. I'm ok with it now since he looks like he'll be a good player, but at the same time they're having a good player sitting on the bench in Jones right now while having to play some average guys at other spots.

TT has a unquestionable knack for finding talent. Hopefully over the years he becomes better at spreading that talent across the team. Not saying thats it bad, but if he can master this art he'll be one of the best

I see your point. Personally, I'm fine that they used one first-day pick a year on the WR position and hit every time. Driver is solid, but on the downside. Jones looks ok, but doesn't seem to be a legit #2, maybe he will improve...maybe not.

My guess is they were pretty sure that they could get the the guys the liked at the other positions later in the draft.

p.s. How many 1st round picks do they currently have at WR?

[DonHutson]

When Jones first got hurt I said he needed to get his ass back on the field or he was going to fall off the radar.

Nelson has talent. Martin is a Rodgers favorite. Driver and Jennings aren't going anywhere... outta site, outta mind for James Jones.

Ultimately he should work his way back. He's more talented than Ruvell, but he needs to prove he's as reliable as Martin is. I guess he'll need to prove it in practice.

[RashanGary]

When Jones first got hurt I said he needed to get his ass back on the field or he was going to fall off the radar.

Nelson has talent. Martin is a Rodgers favorite. Driver and Jennings aren't going anywhere... outta site, outta mind for James Jones.

Ultimately he should work his way back. He's more talented than Ruvell, but he needs to prove he's as reliable as Martin is. I guess he'll need to prove it in practice.

solid post.

[cheesner]

Because building a competitive team requires balance. If they keep drafting receivers that are an improvement year after year... sure, they'll be great and loaded with first rounds pick 1-5 at wideout... but they'll have a weakness elsewhere.

After the ridiculous year we put up offensively through the air last year, I didn't like the pick of Jordy. I'm ok with it now since he looks like he'll be a good player, but at the same time they're having a good player sitting on the bench in Jones right now while having to play some average guys at other spots.

TT has a unquestionable knack for finding talent. Hopefully over the years he becomes better at spreading that talent across the team. Not saying thats it bad, but if he can master this art he'll be one of the best

I see your point. Personally, I'm fine that they used one first-day pick a year on the WR position and hit every time. Driver is solid, but on the downside. Jones looks ok, but doesn't seem to be a legit #2, maybe he will improve...maybe not.

My guess is they were pretty sure that they could get the the guys the liked at the other positions later in the draft.

p.s. How many 1st round picks do they currently have at WR?

The question becomes, do you take a less talented player at a position of need or a more talented player at a position of strength. Simply put: drafting less talented players, you will eventually have a less talented team. Never reach for a player because of need - wait till the value matches the pick. TT is doing it right going BPA all the way. Especially in these days. Look at the Harrell pick. Everyone groaned because it was perceived we didn't need a DT. Now, due to injuries and FA loss (trade) we have a need.