Garcia has always been a low potential/high achiever kind of guy. The same is pretty much true of Hasselbeck.
Rodgers has a lot more potential/raw talent. That certainly doesn't mean he will automatically be a superstar, but combined with the work ethic and the team around him, I think there's a good chance.
Why the negativity about Super Bowls? Rodgers stands a much better chance of getting there and winning than if he played for the great majority of other NFL teams. Anybody saying otherwise is dissing the team they supposedly are a fan of.
I wouldn't compare him to Steve Young. Young was a much better runner. Rodgers can get yardage by improvising, but Young was the kind of guy who was a threat to go all the way, and that running plays actually were called for. I do think Rodgers is a better passer, though, and hopefully, will have a longer career--not shortened by concussions gotten with all that running Young did.
At this point, I'd compare his likely future to Pastorini or Stabler.
Rodgers has a lot more potential/raw talent. That certainly doesn't mean he will automatically be a superstar, but combined with the work ethic and the team around him, I think there's a good chance.
Why the negativity about Super Bowls? Rodgers stands a much better chance of getting there and winning than if he played for the great majority of other NFL teams. Anybody saying otherwise is dissing the team they supposedly are a fan of.
I wouldn't compare him to Steve Young. Young was a much better runner. Rodgers can get yardage by improvising, but Young was the kind of guy who was a threat to go all the way, and that running plays actually were called for. I do think Rodgers is a better passer, though, and hopefully, will have a longer career--not shortened by concussions gotten with all that running Young did.
At this point, I'd compare his likely future to Pastorini or Stabler.


Comment