Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greatest Need in the 2009 NFL Draft for Packers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Greatest Need in the 2009 NFL Draft for Packers

    Now that the combine is over, what is the biggest need for the Packers?
    0
    Nose Tackle
    0%
    0
    Defensive End
    0%
    0
    Rush Linebacker
    0%
    0
    Offensive Tackle
    0%
    0
    Cornerback
    0%
    0

  • #2
    I said DE. We potentially have our linebackers although an upgrade wouldn't hurt. What we really need is an end or two. Jenkins and Harrell can be effective but are not dependable. Jolly isn't a great fit at end and Cole is a terrible fit.
    70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      I said DE. We potentially have our linebackers although an upgrade wouldn't hurt. What we really need is an end or two. Jenkins and Harrell can be effective but are not dependable. Jolly isn't a great fit at end and Cole is a terrible fit.
      I agree, for the most part, but our biggest need on defense was a pass rush and I agree a strong front four will help develop the pass rush but the rush comes from the linebackers in this scheme. The more talented players the better.

      Comment


      • #4
        Pass Rushing OLB... I have Orakpo penciled in for that role.

        NT... have Raji penciled in for that role.

        Rest of the draft... holes everywhere, or soon to be holes; throw a dart.

        TT wont look at need with that first pick though... you know his mantra, which ever player they figure has a better future, regardless of position. We're as likely to end up with a RB or WR at that pick as we are a NT, or rush LB.
        wist

        Comment


        • #5
          Dear Mr. Thompson,

          Please draft a new quarterback.

          Signed,

          Partial
          Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by wist43
            Pass Rushing OLB... I have Orakpo penciled in for that role.

            NT... have Raji penciled in for that role.

            Rest of the draft... holes everywhere, or soon to be holes; throw a dart.

            TT wont look at need with that first pick though... you know his mantra, which ever player they figure has a better future, regardless of position. We're as likely to end up with a RB or WR at that pick as we are a NT, or rush LB.
            You complain about our team being a poor fit for a 3-4 than pencil in Orakpo at OLB, LOL

            Comment


            • #7
              i say tackle if one of the top 3 fall, right now andre smith is off my board

              next up would be raji if he's there

              i'm back on the orakpo bandwagon, he's my third choice

              tyson jackson would be my 4th choice if all the others are gone at #9

              IMO, no cb warrants the #9 pick

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by wist43
                Pass Rushing OLB... I have Orakpo penciled in for that role.

                NT... have Raji penciled in for that role.

                Rest of the draft... holes everywhere, or soon to be holes; throw a dart.

                TT wont look at need with that first pick though... you know his mantra, which ever player they figure has a better future, regardless of position. We're as likely to end up with a RB or WR at that pick as we are a NT, or rush LB.
                I thought we covered this already. Not look at the teams needs? Simply not true. Just because he doesn't limit his options to a single position doesn't mean that he doesn't draft with the teams needs in mind. If you don't believe this common sense logic, consider that most of his first picks ended up being at positions that were very much needed. Fan/media perception is not always reality.

                Comment


                • #9
                  In order, DE, NT, CB, LB.
                  "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Greatest Need in the 2009 NFL Draft for Packers

                    LB - CB - DE/DT - RB - OL - QB - TE - WR

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      DE before NT? Not IMO - we have one DE, and some guys who can play the other side - granted, they're 'just guys' but at least there's someone.

                      I think NT is out biggest need. Pickett is not going to play 100% of the snaps there this year, and I don't think we've got anyone else who can play in the middle. Cole and Jolly would be the next two guys, I guess, and even Jolly is potentially slated to be outside.

                      OT is also a spot we need to look at, but even though there's a lot of bitching about Clifton here, our offense was where it was with him in there last year, and we've got other tackles on the roster - and I agree that Colledge deserves his shot at LT. One of Tausch, Giacomini or Barbre will man the other side.
                      --
                      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by sheepshead
                        Dear Mr. Thompson,

                        Please draft a new quarterback.

                        Signed,

                        Partial
                        P.S. I know more than you, so just do it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I missed OT, so I'd go DE, NT, OT, CB, LB. Honestly, I'd be okay with drafting anybody at #9 from any of these positions. You could even throw in S, if there was somebody worthy of it (e.g. a Sean Taylor like prospect).
                          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Guiness
                            DE before NT? Not IMO - we have one DE, and some guys who can play the other side - granted, they're 'just guys' but at least there's someone.

                            I think NT is out biggest need. Pickett is not going to play 100% of the snaps there this year, and I don't think we've got anyone else who can play in the middle. Cole and Jolly would be the next two guys, I guess, and even Jolly is potentially slated to be outside.
                            Maybe or maybe not. McCarthy has said that they were not going to use 2-gap NT technique, which should allow Cole, Jenkins and Jolly to play NT.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Punter? Sorry....

                              DT, DE, CB, OL, RB/KR.

                              Is there a KR in this draft that will make it big? It would be so nice to have a real threat back there on returns.
                              C.H.U.D.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X