Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Your 2026 Camp Crush Anthony Campbell

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Back to Campbell. Aaron Nagler seemed to think that Campbell played well against Denver. But man, there seems to be no place for him on the 53. Not right now, any way. Hargrave, Wyatt, McClellan, Brooks, Brinson all ahead of him, and Ford and Stackhouse playing the base nose tackle position. Don't know what you do with this guy. Is "Warm" Karl Brooks really that much better?
    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

    KYPack

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
      Back to Campbell. Aaron Nagler seemed to think that Campbell played well against Denver. But man, there seems to be no place for him on the 53. Not right now, any way. Hargrave, Wyatt, McClellan, Brooks, Brinson all ahead of him, and Ford and Stackhouse playing the base nose tackle position. Don't know what you do with this guy. Is "Warm" Karl Brooks really that much better?
      Bill Huber at SI has Packers trading Brooks (probably for TE) to make room for Campbell. https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/onsi/...and-two-trades
      I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #33
        For my money, yes, I'd like to move on from Brooks. I was thinking more like a 6th for him. I think you can find that 4th TE off the wires. We could REALLY use another CB that isn't a headcase. I still have my doubts about Nixon on the final roster. I could see him being "injured" the second he is unhappy. He is like Jaire (who he says really influenced him) except he hasn't made the same kind of money. He needs to ball out in a contract year, but I just don't think he is smart enough to realize it (much like Jaire didn't realize no one would pay him if he got out of his GB contract).
        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Joemailman View Post

          Bill Huber at SI has Packers trading Brooks (probably for TE) to make room for Campbell. https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/onsi/...and-two-trades
          That is a hell of a fakeout. He's be on the 1's since the offseason. I have my doubts about him as a starter in the 4-3 3 tech but a more 4 tech DT in a 3-4 might be more his thing?

          Campbell has spent just a small amount of time with the 1s. They could be hiding him but man that would be a jump. He's a camp crush but even I don't see this.

          Hargrave being setup to start with Campbell as his backup seems more likely in this event.
          Last edited by pbmax; 08-23-2026, 02:45 PM.
          Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

          Comment


          • #35
            But to keep Campbell, something's gotta give. You really can only afford to keep six. So if you keep Brooks as a 4 tech in this defense, whom do you get rid of? Not Brinson. Certainly not McClellan. Not Hargrave. And you've got to have a nose tackle, so Ford or Stackhouse or Jethro Crumedy (or whoever he is) very likely stays.

            I would be really bummed if the Packers don't keep one true nose tackle. They'll get run over like Carolina did to them last year.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Fritz View Post
              But to keep Campbell, something's gotta give. You really can only afford to keep six. So if you keep Brooks as a 4 tech in this defense, whom do you get rid of? Not Brinson. Certainly not McClellan. Not Hargrave. And you've got to have a nose tackle, so Ford or Stackhouse or Jethro Crumedy (or whoever he is) very likely stays.

              I would be really bummed if the Packers don't keep one true nose tackle. They'll get run over like Carolina did to them last year.
              I can see the argument for two even if unlikely; I think they think they need pass rushers more.
              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

              Comment


              • #37
                So crushes were 3 for 3 this year, 2 on practice squad and 1 on the roster though Campbell might be looking at some game day inactives because of numbers (7 D Line on active roster) depending on Brinson's health.

                They lost Perry, Simpson and Sheppard. Perry could have bad days in coverage even if he was collecting picks, he would have been a nice depth piece but not sure its a catastrophe. Simpson at outside corner looked possibly promising but the depth again seems to make the position stronger without him. With Sturdivant and Neyor, I am not despondent over losing Sheppard. He had the punt return but to my eyes it seemed the slowest punt return of all time.
                Last edited by pbmax; 09-05-2026, 10:26 AM.
                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                  So crushes were 3 for 3 this year, 2 on practice squad and 1 on the roster though Campbell might be looking at some game day inactives because of numbers (7 D Line on active roster) depending on Brinson's health.

                  They lost Perry, Simpson and Sheppard. Perry could have bad days in coverage even if he was collecting picks, he would have been a nice depth piece but not sure its a catastrophe. Simpson at outside corner looked possibly promising but the depth again seems to make the position stronger without him. With Sturdivant and Neyor, I am not despondent over losing Sheppard. He had the punt return but to my eyes it seemed the slowest punt return of all time.
                  That punt return was 90% due to the blocking. Gives me some hope for the ST in general. Not sure I've ever seen a guy make the NFL with as poor a college football resume as Campbell. Pro Days matter.
                  I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
                  While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
                  But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
                  They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Joemailman View Post

                    That punt return was 90% due to the blocking. Gives me some hope for the ST in general. Not sure I've ever seen a guy make the NFL with as poor a college football resume as Campbell. Pro Days matter.
                    Absolutely. No stone unturned.

                    I suspect at some point they try to sneak him onto the practice squad to open a space. I think they viewed him as a likely waiver claim if he was released at cut down. Curious if they play him at all (he's 25) or they try to get another year of seasoning. Suspect he might see some pass rush snaps as second Aces unit if he is active.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      As always, my predictions suck ass. I wrote that "You really can only afford to keep six," and then they kept . . . seven.
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by texaspackerbacker View Post
                        Neyor really did the job. Sturtevant had bad luck with that head shot, but I think he's right there two. Even after losing a couple of good WRs, we still have an embarrassment of riches at that position.
                        Oh my....I unblocked Tex in time to catch him with using the wrong form of too. If you hadn't spell checked me a couple times over the years I would have ignored it.
                        The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Speaking of embarrassed, I am hahahaha. Welcome back to reading my posts and getting suitably educated doing it.
                          What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            It might not be the type of education you think it is, Tex.

                            Mosqueda at ACME thinks the Pack will only make five d-linemen active for the Minny game: Ford, Brooks, Hargrave, Wyatt, and Brinson. So probably no glimpse of Campbell against starting-caliber offensive linemen.
                            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                            KYPack

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                              It might not be the type of education you think it is, Tex.

                              Mosqueda at ACME thinks the Pack will only make five d-linemen active for the Minny game: Ford, Brooks, Hargrave, Wyatt, and Brinson. So probably no glimpse of Campbell against starting-caliber offensive linemen.
                              Is Brinson healthy? He was not practicing last week.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I'd forgotten McClellan so I threw Brinson's name in there. Could be Brinson, could be McClellan. But the main point for me was that Campbell will likely not be active.
                                "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                                KYPack

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X