Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nick Barnett's contract

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nick Barnett's contract

    how long is he signed? I cant imagine its much longer before he asks for a raise....
    Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

  • #2
    Re: Nick Barnett's contract

    Originally posted by Tony Oday
    how long is he signed? I cant imagine its much longer before he asks for a raise....
    Isnt next season his last one? At least for FA? Well after the license/city council mess he is gone most likely.

    Comment


    • #3
      It won't expire quick enough for me...
      wist

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by wist43
        It won't expire quick enough for me...
        You got any empty spray cans in your back yard?

        Comment


        • #5
          he better not be! I know most of you dont like him but he still is a tackling machine that has been doing it with what THREE different systems! I mean cmon. Who would you rather have Hardy Nickerson? E. J. Henderson? Junior Seau?
          Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

          Comment


          • #6
            Dont forget Boss Bailey. At least Sherm got that one right.

            Comment


            • #7
              What is Barnett going to have to do to prove to some PAcker fans that he is a good MLB? 30 sacks 15 ints and 300 tackles?
              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tony Oday
                What is Barnett going to have to do to prove to some PAcker fans that he is a good MLB? 30 sacks 15 ints and 300 tackles?
                If Barnett gets close to these 2 numbers in his career I would be happy.

                Originally posted by 3irty1
                This is museum quality stupidity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Nick Barnett's contract

                  Originally posted by Tony Oday
                  how long is he signed? I cant imagine its much longer before he asks for a raise....
                  According to the Unofficial Packers Cap Page, Barnett is signed through 2009

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Barnett is poised to have a monster year. He has done nothing but improve each season he has played. I hope that he stays healthy and remains a Packer. Anyone who thinks he needs to go obviously hasn't been watching the guy play the last 3 years.

                    AJ Hawk update:
                    Rumor is that after getting pushed around in OTA's by the offensive line (you know the one that isn't supposed to be any good?), Hawk decided he needed to bulk up if he was going to stand a chance to make it in the NFL. Although he did show some very good instincts, he wasn't physically able to man handle the offenders as he did in college.

                    As I have stated numerous times, he is an outside LB and we will be very lucky if he makes an impact before mid-season.
                    "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
                    – Benjamin Franklin

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      if barnett IS locked up thru the '09 seasonand he breaks out and has two all-pro type years i'd like to see the pack negotiate a new deal. if not i don't expect to to see anything done with him til the end of the '08 season.i think he's a decent player who is being compensated justly.i feel the same of harris as i'm not as enamored with him as some, Al included.and kgb aint worth the weight of the paper in his contract.
                      Think I'll roll another number for the road.
                      I HATE everything about the Minnesota Vikings

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        That has to be wrong. He was drafted before the 2003 season, his rookie contract would have been 4 or 5 years, and he hasn't gotten an extension. I suspect his contract expires after the 2007 season, or possibly after this season.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                          Dont forget Boss Bailey. At least Sherm got that one right.


                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by MerlinWizard222
                            As I have stated numerous times, he is an outside LB and we will be very lucky if he makes an impact before mid-season.
                            I wonder what wist will say about Hawk if this turns out to be true....

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                              That has to be wrong. He was drafted before the 2003 season, his rookie contract would have been 4 or 5 years, and he hasn't gotten an extension. I suspect his contract expires after the 2007 season, or possibly after this season.
                              Here you go, the article from JSOnline 2003.....

                              "A National Football League source said the Oregon State linebacker agreed to terms on what is essentially a five-year, $6 million deal, including a $3.2 million signing bonus. The deal will go in the books as seven years, $7.7 million, but a two-year option makes it almost guaranteed that the sixth and seventh years won't be realized."

                              Link: http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=156418

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X