Originally posted by ThunderDan
For example, Nelson ran i think a 10.63 and this year, Cali in 09 had someone named Carroll who was a national leader....he ran a 10.30.
Clearly he is faster than jordy. However, that isn't the point. The point is whether you can compare a kansas athlete to a cali...and how do they compare. Hmm.
The #10 runner in Cali ran a 10.63...so jordy would be pretty damn good in Cali. And, it wouldn't be far off to say that his time is even more impressive considering that most likely he didn't get the training in track that cali students get, competed in football which is at odds with track...and for sure didn't get pushed by other competitors like those in cali do.
What is funny is that partial is so clueless that he made this argument, when he lives in a state that has produced amazing track athletes/olympic class..floyd heard, michael bennett, etc.
BTW, bennett's 100m record...10.33.


Comment