Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Exciting NFC North: So which QB Wins the Most Games in 2009?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Exciting NFC North: So which QB Wins the Most Games in 2009?

    Well, this Favre-O-Drama is just getting better and better everyday now. Got plenty of hardcore Pack fan buddies, some Vike fans, and some Bear fans talking bout the madness as everyone seems equally excited about "their" QB's this year. Used to have a Lion fan buddy from Detroit, but he turned his back on his hometown to root for the Raiders the last couple of years. Yea...Really worked out well, eh Tim?

    Looks good on paper for all 3 teams, but really what's the deal?

    With Favre more than surely coming back again to the Vikes and the Cutler trade to the Bears it sure looks interesting for hardcore fans of all 3 teams in the NFC North, no?

    -Arod is the man, and gets Snake's vote as the guy with the stats, youth, and breakout year for not just him, but for the Pack of the 3 teams in 2009. Here's hoping for 10+ wins possibly this year and the crown. A young, strong-armed QB that proved much last year in starting 16 games and having a strong fledgling season as a 1st year starter. He already looks the part of leader without significant questions about his arm, health, experience like a year ago.

    -Cutler has NEVER had a winning team in all of college or the pros so far. He has incredible talent, but immaturity, a new system to learn, and a less than stellar supporting offensive crew will be his downfall. That's 2 birds with one stone if Cutler and Da Bears fail. Hopefully an EPIC FAIL. Fuck Da Bears.

    -Favre...I could care less about the soap opera shit other than the fact it only hurts team unity with the QB's on their team and personell, but face it....dude's gonna be 40 this year coming off a bum arm. I really can't bet against him though as he's had what, 1 losing season in his long ass career as a starter, but looks like the wheels are finally falling off the Iron Man. To his defense, he looks to have a few positives going for him though...Arguably the top D-Line and O-Line in all of football with maybe the best talent in all of football at RB with AP (dude is a beast fosho). New WR's, etc. with the same Offensive packages under D. Bevell he ran in GB, too. The only question is ironic as can the Iron Man hold up, as he broke down last year at 39?

    No matter what, Snake is a GB fan 1st and formost, but a NFL fan 2nd. This will be exciting to watch, though, with 3 very good QB's taking charge of 3 potentially great teams if all falls in place. This might be a dogfight as I already got $50 on a bet with my die-hard Bear fan boss that Arod will win more games than Cutler in 2009. Throw Brett in the picture with that loaded Vike team....Who knows?

    NOTE: To try and throw a javelin at subjectivity and homer views....This isn't who's the best QB this year, but who gets the most wins for their team?

    Snake's Take:

    Snake supports ARod as his vote. Go Pack.
    Fuck you Cutler you whiny prick.
    And oh yeah, don't get hurt too bad on that turf Bretty! Have fun! But remember that Bradshaw will be giving you commercial break backrubs at FOX and have a job for ya, and you know Strahan will be getting you bottled waters at the snap of finger too.
    0
    Arod. Homernisms aside. Dude will bring us the division.
    0%
    0
    Cutler. Dude is a punk, but that arm is what the Bears were missing for 2 decades.
    0%
    0
    Favre. Dude has 9 lives and is a proven winner. With that stud lineup, he's gonna take the division and teabag TT.
    0%
    0
    Stafford. 0-16 Chumps to Champs. AHAHAAHAHA. Sorry not gonna happen.
    0%
    0
    Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

  • #2
    NFC North will be exciting this season .....with or without Favre playing for the Vikings. Esp. seeing how the new D comes together.

    Comment


    • #3
      It most certainly will! Wonder if the Lions will win one this year...?
      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

      Comment


      • #4
        Sure they will. They may well win 4 or 5.
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Fritz
          Sure they will. They may well win 4 or 5.
          I predict 3 wins for the Lions--a big step upwards for them.

          Comment


          • #6
            If you gave me a choice of Arod, Cutler, Favre, and Stafford, I'd take Arod. If it was 1996, I'd take Favre.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Fritz
              If you gave me a choice of Arod, Cutler, Favre, and Stafford, I'd take Arod. If it was 1996, I'd take Favre.
              mvp 1996

              pro bowler 2009!
              They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

              Brew Crew in 2011!!!

              Comment


              • #8
                I had to go with Favre - but its more based on the team - then anything else. The Vikings have only improved over last year - while I think we may be greatly improved - I see 50% more wins to 9, but not more.....and I think the Vikings win more (with or without Favre).
                'Til the End

                Comment


                • #9
                  I had to go with Favre cuz I love him and he's the most winning QB of all time and Cutler, Arod and Stafford haven't proven to be winning QB's in the NFL yet... soooo Favre it is for me

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Pacopete4
                    I had to go with Favre cuz I love him.........


                    That's sweet.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                      Originally posted by Fritz
                      If you gave me a choice of Arod, Cutler, Favre, and Stafford, I'd take Arod. If it was 1996, I'd take Favre.
                      mvp 1996

                      pro bowler 2009!
                      Dude, if you're using the Pro Bowl as a standard of excellence here, you're in trouble. The Pro Bowl - to me - means something more for a guy being chosen the first time. But once a player gets a certain status, he is, as is also true in the baseball all-star game, often chosen again and again not because of his performance but because of his status.

                      So can have Favre this year if you want him. He's all yours. I suspect that after about half the season you might be crowing about how great he is and how wrong everyone else is, but I also suspect that at season's end you'll be grasping for reasons as to why Favre didn't play as well in the second half as he did in the first.

                      Other well-respected posters on this site have shown, statistically, that last year's second-half swan dive by Favre was not an aberration but a continuation of a pattern that has been in place for about the last five years.
                      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                      KYPack

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Fritz
                        Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                        Originally posted by Fritz
                        If you gave me a choice of Arod, Cutler, Favre, and Stafford, I'd take Arod. If it was 1996, I'd take Favre.
                        mvp 1996

                        pro bowler 2009!
                        Dude, if you're using the Pro Bowl as a standard of excellence here, you're in trouble. The Pro Bowl - to me - means something more for a guy being chosen the first time. But once a player gets a certain status, he is, as is also true in the baseball all-star game, often chosen again and again not because of his performance but because of his status.

                        So can have Favre this year if you want him. He's all yours. I suspect that after about half the season you might be crowing about how great he is and how wrong everyone else is, but I also suspect that at season's end you'll be grasping for reasons as to why Favre didn't play as well in the second half as he did in the first.

                        Other well-respected posters on this site have shown, statistically, that last year's second-half swan dive by Favre was not an aberration but a continuation of a pattern that has been in place for about the last five years.

                        Completely agree Fritz. The swan dive was made worse by injury but he's wearing down. IF he signs with the Vikings and IF they play him in every game they are foolish. Limit his throws with a solid ground game and if he get's dinged up sit his ass, screw the streak. He's old by football standards so he needs to be protected from himself. Can it be done? I have a feeling we're going to find out. Stay tuned!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Rastak
                          Originally posted by Fritz
                          Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                          Originally posted by Fritz
                          If you gave me a choice of Arod, Cutler, Favre, and Stafford, I'd take Arod. If it was 1996, I'd take Favre.
                          mvp 1996

                          pro bowler 2009!
                          Dude, if you're using the Pro Bowl as a standard of excellence here, you're in trouble. The Pro Bowl - to me - means something more for a guy being chosen the first time. But once a player gets a certain status, he is, as is also true in the baseball all-star game, often chosen again and again not because of his performance but because of his status.

                          So can have Favre this year if you want him. He's all yours. I suspect that after about half the season you might be crowing about how great he is and how wrong everyone else is, but I also suspect that at season's end you'll be grasping for reasons as to why Favre didn't play as well in the second half as he did in the first.

                          Other well-respected posters on this site have shown, statistically, that last year's second-half swan dive by Favre was not an aberration but a continuation of a pattern that has been in place for about the last five years.

                          Completely agree Fritz. The swan dive was made worse by injury but he's wearing down. IF he signs with the Vikings and IF they play him in every game they are foolish. Limit his throws with a solid ground game and if he get's dinged up sit his ass, screw the streak. He's old by football standards so he needs to be protected from himself. Can it be done? I have a feeling we're going to find out. Stay tuned!
                          You think Chilly can control him? I don't becuase Chilly doesn't have a set a.k.a. Mike Sherman Syndrome.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Not sure cpk. He hasn't been shy about doing unpopular things. The whole Favre hall-of-fame thing might derail him though. I know Frerotte was PISSED when he got benched and Chilly was pretty much "oh well, tough shit for you"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Rastak
                              Not sure cpk. He hasn't been shy about doing unpopular things. The whole Favre hall-of-fame thing might derail him though. I know Frerotte was PISSED when he got benched and Chilly was pretty much "oh well, tough shit for you"
                              Easier to deal with a journeyman than Favre. Sherman was that way too. He got tough with guys like Ahman Green. But he was an excuse a minute with Favre.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X