Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NFC North QB Race 2009

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Partial
    Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.
    Partial, you can't accept a kind of evidence (accuracy of throws) and then just throw out the results that don't agree with your conclusion.

    He had some funky high throws last year too. In the game coverage, he mentions that he rushed the overthrow to a wide open Driver in the end zone.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Zool
      Look people, i know some of us like to argue, but can't you just start ignoring Partial and argue amongst yourselves?
      Sure I see this after I respond.
      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Zool
        Look people, i know some of us like to argue, but can't you just start ignoring Partial and argue amongst yourselves?
        My time out was up. I just can't stand the idiotic spew. I really wish we had an ignore feature.
        But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

        -Tim Harmston

        Comment


        • #64
          I know its tough. I've had my share of relapses. He just says such stupid things sometimes. If we band together, we can stop this addiction once and for all.

          Maybe we need an intervention?
          Originally posted by 3irty1
          This is museum quality stupidity.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by ThunderDan
            I just can't stand the idiotic spew.
            Maybe, but just about everybody baits him to death around here. Sure he has strong opinions and oftentimes they aren't widely shared, but I respect him for showing the backbone to stand his ground and stick up for himself.

            I can't think of a flame war that he started since coming back. He has every right to defend himself when he's attacked and he has a right to his opinion.

            So, if we focussed on debating him when we disagree instead of going out of our way to personally attack him, this might be a friendlier place.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Tarlam!
              Originally posted by ThunderDan
              I just can't stand the idiotic spew.
              Maybe, but just about everybody baits him to death around here. Sure he has strong opinions and oftentimes they aren't widely shared, but I respect him for showing the backbone to stand his ground and stick up for himself.

              I can't think of a flame war that he started since coming back. He has every right to defend himself when he's attacked and he has a right to his opinion.

              So, if we focussed on debating him when we disagree instead of going out of our way to personally attack him, this might be a friendlier place.
              See but the problem is that his "strong opinions" are always flawed in which us, the kind people of PR, point that out which makes him even more irate

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Tarlam!
                Originally posted by ThunderDan
                I just can't stand the idiotic spew.
                Maybe, but just about everybody baits him to death around here. Sure he has strong opinions and oftentimes they aren't widely shared, but I respect him for showing the backbone to stand his ground and stick up for himself.

                I can't think of a flame war that he started since coming back. He has every right to defend himself when he's attacked and he has a right to his opinion.

                So, if we focussed on debating him when we disagree instead of going out of our way to personally attack him, this might be a friendlier place.
                Wrong! On the whole last play by the Packers vs Bengals, he was wrong. Jordy Nelson wasn't open. The bump by the Bengal player was 3 yards down the field. And the coach of the Packers said they should have been able to run a play down the middle and get another play off.

                Yet P argued every point. I really wish I had the endzone stills for that play to show the breakdown.
                But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                -Tim Harmston

                Comment


                • #68
                  I saw that discussion, Dan. From what I recall, P tried to remain on topic despite being personally attacked.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Tarlam!
                    I saw that discussion, Dan. From what I recall, P tried to remain on topic despite being personally attacked.

                    So it's OK to "lie" for the whole thread and not expect to get people mad??? This is why we need the ignore feature!
                    But Rodgers leads the league in frumpy expressions and negative body language on the sideline, which makes him, like Josh Allen, a unique double threat.

                    -Tim Harmston

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      He does it for effect people. He likes the role.
                      Originally posted by 3irty1
                      This is museum quality stupidity.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I don't know when he lied. I know he argued his point about the last play quite vigorously and was personally attacked.

                        I am not innocent of not having it in for one, two posters here, so I can undertand your emotion on this.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Zool
                          He does it for effect people. He likes the role.
                          Well, I've hung out with him and he really is as passionate in real life as he is in his opinions here.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            I want to apologize to Ras and the other Rats for taking this thread so off topic. I'm very sorry.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Tarlam!
                              Originally posted by ThunderDan
                              I just can't stand the idiotic spew.
                              Maybe, but just about everybody baits him to death around here. Sure he has strong opinions and oftentimes they aren't widely shared, but I respect him for showing the backbone to stand his ground and stick up for himself.

                              I can't think of a flame war that he started since coming back. He has every right to defend himself when he's attacked and he has a right to his opinion.

                              So, if we focussed on debating him when we disagree instead of going out of our way to personally attack him, this might be a friendlier place.
                              Maybe if he wasn't so stubborn in his "I'm right, everybody else is wrong, I'm smart, you're an idiot, and I'm gonna make a point about it" type attitude it would be easier. Speaking from my own personal experience with him, when I do keep focused on topic and argue just the facts presented this is what I get:

                              I love how you ignore the question I answered and make more excuses. You lose. Game set match mother fucker.
                              He loves how I ignored a question he answered (which I didn't ignore, by the way, I just didn't agree with) and made more excuses (because I didn't agree with his answer, anything I say is going to sound like an excuse to him).

                              At least where the arguments between he and I are concerned, he's the one to make things personal. Maybe if he didn't make things personal when we are focused on debating the topic, we wouldn't respond personally, and this might be a friendlier place.
                              Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Maybe some of you all need a an "Official Partial Opinion & Rebuttal Thread" so we can keep some of these threads on topic!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X