NFC North QB Race 2009

[falco]

I knew a guy in college who's mother slapped his balls with a metal spoon to stop him from touching himself as a small child. Twenty years later, he would masturbate by slapping himself in the balls with a metal spoon. Sometimes I wonder what your metal spoon was.

I hope you never ate soup at his house.

[Rastak]

I knew a guy in college who's mother slapped his balls with a metal spoon to stop him from touching himself as a small child. Twenty years later, he would masturbate by slapping himself in the balls with a metal spoon. Sometimes I wonder what your metal spoon was.

I hope you never ate soup at his house.

You went to school with David Carradine!

[MOBB DEEP]

I knew a guy in college who's mother slapped his balls with a metal spoon to stop him from touching himself as a small child. Twenty years later, he would masturbate by slapping himself in the balls with a metal spoon. Sometimes I wonder what your metal spoon was.

Thats some funny as shyt...stitches

[superfan]

I knew a guy in college who's mother slapped his balls with a metal spoon to stop him from touching himself as a small child. Twenty years later, he would masturbate by slapping himself in the balls with a metal spoon. Sometimes I wonder what your metal spoon was.

And thus we know a little more about our friend Deputy Nutz.

[Partial]

Here is yet another example of more personal attacks, most of which were completely unprovoked. Justify it however you want....

I'm gonna marry Skin some day.

We aren't already? What was all that consummation business about then you dirty whore?

How is this helping the harrassment?

12.

I'm gonna marry Skin some day.

Please do not encourage him and his personal attacks against me. How is this helping the problem?

11.

He does it for effect people. He likes the role.

Actually, I don't. I think it's unfair and ridiculous. I would love to sit down face and face to and talk football without anyone knowing who I am and most here would agree with me on most topics.

People are homers by nature. It's okay. It's a natural reaction. I try to look at things objectively. People don't like it when someone doesn't agree with there opinion. They attack me for looking at cold hard facts like losses, etc.

What you don't understand is that no one wants to sit down and talk football with someone like you in person. You don't have any idea what you're talking about and when someone presents detailed arguments and evidence that contradicts your confabulated notions, you simply ignore them or insult the other person's intelligence by claiming they're a homer. You may as well be arguing that unicorns shit purple mushrooms filled with cherry jam for how far your football arguments fall from any kind of educated subjective opinion or objective fact.

Case in point: Nelson being "open" at the end of the CIN game. Not only does your position demonstrate your lack of understanding of some basics of the game (most notably defense, offense, and coaching), but you also continue to argue in direct opposition to the reality that the video clearly shows to anyone who isn't you.

Your arguments aren't smart enough to turn you into the controversial straight talker you are trying so hard to be. There's plenty to accurately criticize about this team. There's no need to continue to make things up just to get attention.

I knew a guy in college who's mother slapped his balls with a metal spoon to stop him from touching himself as a small child. Twenty years later, he would masturbate by slapping himself in the balls with a metal spoon. Sometimes I wonder what your metal spoon was.

This is out of line. You're again making assumptions and being a jerk. This is inappropriate and harrassment.

10.

Pip.

How is this positively contributing to the thread?

10.

Look people, i know some of us like to argue, but can't you just start ignoring Partial and argue amongst yourselves?

My time out was up. I just can't stand the idiotic spew. I really wish we had an ignore feature.

Join the club. It's constant moronic drivel that really garbage's up the forum and, in my opinion keeps some from contributing in a constructive way. I think his mom works here because any one who calls him out gets slammed.

What is with the personal attack? This is completely out of line. I have asked you time and time again to not respond to my posts yet you insist. This is harrassment.

9.

I just can't stand the idiotic spew.

Maybe, but just about everybody baits him to death around here. Sure he has strong opinions and oftentimes they aren't widely shared, but I respect him for showing the backbone to stand his ground and stick up for himself.

I can't think of a flame war that he started since coming back. He has every right to defend himself when he's attacked and he has a right to his opinion.

So, if we focussed on debating him when we disagree instead of going out of our way to personally attack him, this might be a friendlier place.

Maybe if he wasn't so stubborn in his "I'm right, everybody else is wrong, I'm smart, you're an idiot, and I'm gonna make a point about it" type attitude it would be easier. Speaking from my own personal experience with him, when I do keep focused on topic and argue just the facts presented this is what I get:

I love how you ignore the question I answered and make more excuses. You lose. Game set match mother fucker.

He loves how I ignored a question he answered (which I didn't ignore, by the way, I just didn't agree with) and made more excuses (because I didn't agree with his answer, anything I say is going to sound like an excuse to him).

At least where the arguments between he and I are concerned, he's the one to make things personal. Maybe if he didn't make things personal when we are focused on debating the topic, we wouldn't respond personally, and this might be a friendlier place.

Again, I have never once said I'm right and everyone else is wrong.

If you're going to make such a claim, please cite a source. If you cannot, then I do not appreciate you making these statements. I'm a very understanding person but this is completely unacceptable and should not be tolerated.

8.

He does it for effect people. He likes the role.

Awfully presumptuous. I do not like it at all. I find this extremely offensive. Please do not talk about what I do and do not like as you have demonstrated that you do not know anything about me.

7.

I saw that discussion, Dan. From what I recall, P tried to remain on topic despite being personally attacked.

So it's OK to "lie" for the whole thread and not expect to get people mad??? This is why we need the ignore feature!

I'm lying now? Where? I'm entitled to my opinion and you're entitled to yours. This is inappropriate to call me a liar. Please take your concerns to PM or to the admin if you have them instead of attacking and defiling my character.

6.

I just can't stand the idiotic spew.

Maybe, but just about everybody baits him to death around here. Sure he has strong opinions and oftentimes they aren't widely shared, but I respect him for showing the backbone to stand his ground and stick up for himself.

I can't think of a flame war that he started since coming back. He has every right to defend himself when he's attacked and he has a right to his opinion.

So, if we focussed on debating him when we disagree instead of going out of our way to personally attack him, this might be a friendlier place.

Wrong! On the whole last play by the Packers vs Bengals, he was wrong. Jordy Nelson wasn't open. The bump by the Bengal player was 3 yards down the field. And the coach of the Packers said they should have been able to run a play down the middle and get another play off.

Yet P argued every point. I really wish I had the endzone stills for that play to show the breakdown.

You're entitled to your opinion (which resulted in the team losing) and I'm entitled to mine. It doesn't make it dumb, it makes it different. I've addressed this one numerous occasions and you still ignore several facts.

You wouldn't say this to my face, so don't say it here. Take it up over PM if you have some beef. This is out of line and inappropriate.

5.

I know its tough. I've had my share of relapses. He just says such stupid things sometimes. If we band together, we can stop this addiction once and for all.

Maybe we need an intervention?

Was it necessary to insult me twice when I have not addressed you?

Who are you to call me stupid? Please step off your high horse and address your issues with me over PM instead of attacking me in a crowd.

4.

Look people, i know some of us like to argue, but can't you just start ignoring Partial and argue amongst yourselves?

My time out was up. I just can't stand the idiotic spew. I really wish we had an ignore feature.

Is this contributing to the topic at hand, or is this spam. Have you ever PM'd me your concerns? No, instead you were a jerk about it.

Would you say this to my face ever? I highly doubt it. Is this appropriate? No, it is not.

3.

[quote="ThunderDan"]

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

Translation:

I don't care if the vast majority of people disagree with me because I am the smartest person I know and I am always right! Also, listen to me more. I am smart and educated while you idiots are just sidewalk fodder for us intellectuals to abuse as we(I) they fit.

You forgot the part where we aren't cool either!

It must be so delightful to live in a made-up world and scream that everyone is a jerk for pointing out reality.[quote=Sparkey]ade up world? No. Does it make you a jerk to insult me without me saying anything to you? Absolutely.

2.

Right now I would rate them:

1. Cutler
2. Favre
3. Rodgers -- because I think he is injured
4. Stafford looks like he could be a gamer too.

If he is injured, would he have gotten MORE accurate deep as the game went on?

Irrelevant. I still think he is hurt. He is very accurate typically, even last year, and he looks off this year to me. Vastly different from PS and even last year.

Translation:

I don't care if the vast majority of people disagree with me because I am the smartest person I know and I am always right! Also, listen to me more. I am smart and educated while you idiots are just sidewalk fodder for us intellectuals to abuse as we(I) they fit.

Is this really called for and necessary? Did I even say anything to you to this point? Where did I say anything pertaining to what you're bringing up?

Completely out of line.

1.

[falco]

Partial - do you have any idea what it would look like if someone took 5 minutes to dredge up "partial's greatest hits?"

[Fritz]

All I know is that in the court of Packerrat opinion, Skin makes me laugh my ass off.

"You may as well be arguing that unicorns shit purple mushrooms filled with cherry jam for how far your football arguments fall from any kind of educated subjective opinion or objective fact."

But I thought unicorns did shit purple mushrooms filled with cherry jam. I mean, there is this creature called a civet which eats coffee beans and shits them. Then they are "harvested" (like grapes? Like human organs?) and made into the most expensive coffee in the world.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I knew a guy in college who's mother slapped his balls with a metal spoon to stop him from touching himself as a small child. Twenty years later, he would masturbate by slapping himself in the balls with a metal spoon. Sometimes I wonder what your metal spoon was.

And thus we know a little more about our friend Deputy Nutz.

Nice!

[Zool]

P enough of this BS self righteousness. You've always been an instigator in my eyes and all you're doing right now is being a polite asshole.

I can say whatever the fuck I want to Skin and him back to me. Trust me when I say it will continue despite your objections.

[Zool]

Also:

penis

[SkinBasket]

I think someone's trying to get himself banned tonight. I applaud nutz for his valiant effort on said person's behalf. Even if he did violate the privacy of my smelly vagina.

[Rastak]

Through the first quarter of the season.


1. Favre 104.6
2. Rodgers 101.1
3. Cutler 89.3
4. Stafford 65.5

Favre & Rodgers rising. Cutler solid and Stafford not so much.

[MadScientist]

Through the first quarter of the season.


1. Favre 104.6
2. Rodgers 101.1
3. Cutler 89.3
4. Stafford 65.5

Favre & Rodgers rising. Cutler solid and Stafford not so much.

I'd say Stafford is rising quickly. He's gone from 27 to 40 to 57 to 65. Not too bad for a rookie starting for a team that was 0-16 last year. The last two weeks he was a very solid 87.8 and 89.6. He just dug a hole the first 2 weeks.

This is the first year I can remember that none of the teams in the division has to field a sorry excuse for a QB, and it's living up to the pre-season expectations so far.

[Guiness]

Through the first quarter of the season.


1. Favre 104.6
2. Rodgers 101.1
3. Cutler 89.3
4. Stafford 65.5

Favre & Rodgers rising. Cutler solid and Stafford not so much.

I'd say Stafford is rising quickly. He's gone from 27 to 40 to 57 to 65. Not too bad for a rookie starting for a team that was 0-16 last year. The last two weeks he was a very solid 87.8 and 89.6. He just dug a hole the first 2 weeks.

This is the first year I can remember that none of the teams in the division has to field a sorry excuse for a QB, and it's living up to the pre-season expectations so far.

Agreed that Stafford is looking not bad, but man should someone in Detroit be shot for trotting him out onto the field week 1.

I don't care if he 'gave them the best chance to win' or some such crap.

[MOBB DEEP]

Through the first quarter of the season.


1. Favre 104.6
2. Rodgers 101.1
3. Cutler 89.3
4. Stafford 65.5

Favre & Rodgers rising. Cutler solid and Stafford not so much.

Didnt know brett passed aaron; yardage-wise it cant be close tho