Although you got a win, should you be concerned with the D?

[Dabaddestbear]

Shouldn't you be a little worried about your own D. I'll admit they played well in the 2nd half, but they were carved up like a thanksgiving turkey in the first.

They have been carved up in the first half by most teams this year, but unlike the Packers coaching staff, they know how to make adjustments. You do recall the Bears defense destroyed Detroit in that game right? They scored 48 points as a result of Defense giving them excellent field position.

[Dabaddestbear]

They Double the TE all night....look at the game.
Forte was used on occasion versus how they normally use him out the backfield. You guys were using a corner WITH help of a safety over top on Olsen.
And to say well we kept them scoreless in the first half as validation for what the topic of this thread is very irrelevant. I asked specifically about a group of WR's that many of you still aren't worth the cloth of their jerseys, yet they outperformed your more heralded WR's . So I ask if you think such production from such very young and average WR's in you guys eyes are something to be concerned with.

I never said it was a big issue, only that it may be a wrinkle of concern. Thank you Guiness, Wist, sharpe1027, run pMc, Harlan, and a few others for staying on the topic at hand.

I think you answered your own question. The Packer's focused on everyone but your WRs all night, and your WRs were still pretty average at best. Basically, even when the Packers all but ignored your WRs, they did very little.

I guess tonight the excuse will be that the Packers focused on AP all night and thats why Brett had a field day.
And once again to another Packer fan that didnt know what they were talking about....Bears WR's have been playing better than your big money WR's.

[Dabaddestbear]

Are any of you prepared to argue that Kampman looks comfortable and fluid out in space??? Or that Hawk is the next Ray Lewis???

Are you prepared to argue that it doesn't really matter much if Kampman looks comfortable out in space. Does Jarret Johnson or Greg Ellis look comfortable in space? So, we need A.J. Hawk to be Ray Lewis? I'm fine if he's as good as Bart Scott or Larry Foote.

Rewatch the tape and tell me A.J. Hawk didn't play well.

Yeah, I think I would rethink that debate sir.

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: Although you got a win, should you be concerned with the

How many times have Rodgers needed to bring his team back in the 4th quarter and just couldnt do it? Now Cutler time and time again has done it over and over again with a terrible defense.

Look, time will tell. And I will be laughing at these post.

By the way, glad to be back even though most of ya hate to see me coming.

Remember this?

Yep, I am remembering it tonight...lol.

[Partial]

AJ Hawk is not a Bart Scott or a Larry Foote. No way, no how.

[Dabaddestbear]

Re: Although you got a win, should you be concerned with the

THey traded him cuz they found someone even better..than Orton AND Rodgers..lol.

Like always, sour grapes from a Packer fan that doesnt know any better...lol.

Or this?

yep, they got a franchise QB and a 5th round steal in Knox from the pick they gave us for Orton.

[Dabaddestbear]

He played very well, and is now on pace for 32 picks this year.

How many safeties and sacks are Rodgers on pace to submit to?
Yeah, cry at your stupid gaffes now sir.

[Dabaddestbear]

AJ Hawk is not a Bart Scott or a Larry Foote. No way, no how.

I just have to bump this stuff every now and then to remind people of the stupid stuff that can come out of their mouth.

[3irty1]

AJ Hawk is not a Bart Scott or a Larry Foote. No way, no how.

I just have to bump this stuff every now and then to remind people of the stupid stuff that can come out of their mouth.

He meant that as in Scott and Foote are better I think.

[Dabaddestbear]

AJ Hawk is not a Bart Scott or a Larry Foote. No way, no how.

I just have to bump this stuff every now and then to remind people of the stupid stuff that can come out of their mouth.

He meant that as in Scott and Foote are better I think.

Oh, I wasnt criticizing Partial's comment...only agreeing with him in response to the person mentioning Hawk in the same breath as Foote and Scott.

[Dabaddestbear]

Aahhh, the silence is revisited.

[Bossman641]

You can hang here for as long as you like. I hope you do. So we all can remind you....packers beat the bears. Everyday you are here i hope you remember that...you lost, we won.

Yep, I have no problem with being reminded of that. Just as I will remind those of downward spiral of your team as it stands, and the continued improvement of the Bears.

Been on these boards longer than most Packer fans and I will still be around after some of you jump ship.

Bump for if he ever shows up

[Gunakor]

espn.com currently has us listed as the #3 defense in the NFL. That's both total yards and yards per game average, so we can't blame the bye.

Should we be concerned?

[Brandon494]

Defense has looked great the past two weeks against the Lions and Browns. Lets see if they can keep it up next week against the Vikings, having Bigby back should certainly help.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

The bump made me realize that Dabaddest hasn't been around daily so i could remind he the packers beat the bears. I sure hope he remembers without my assistance.