Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who would you trade Rodgers for?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    CAPS...

    Originally posted by Bossman641
    Originally posted by Partial
    Originally posted by Lurker64
    I wouldn't trade Rodgers for anything other than multiple players, including one or more elite ones and a solid starting QB.

    A young, promising, productive, and talented QB with a good contract is one of the most valuable things you can have in the NFL. I haven't seen enough of most of the other young QBs to consider them really any better than Rodgers. Flacco and Ryan both landed in great situations and weren't really called upon to actually win games for their teams (unlike Rodgers), Young and Leinart are busts to this point (though there's hope for Leinart), Cutler and Rivers are both headcases, Manning and Roethlisberger are overrated and are largely successful because of their elite defenses and one or two unique characteristics (e.g. Roethlisberger is one of the hardest NFL QBs to tackle in the history of the game).

    If I could land, say, Peterson and Roethlisberger for Rodgers, I might consider it.
    1. That Atlanta team picking 3rd to get Ryan was horrible. Ryan is a stud.
    Very good RB, one of the top WR in the league

    And yet they were what, 3rd worst in the league the year before? Chicken or the egg. RB didn't do much in SD (admittedly he was okay behind LT and would have been a solid pickup, he's better than Grant but still not great imo). You can nitpick all you want, but that team magically took a huge transformation with quality coaching and Ryan.

    2. Baltimore missed the playoffs before they drafted Flacco. Next thing you know they're in the championship game. Coincidence? I think not.
    Baltimore was 13-3 in 2006, and struggled to 5-11 in 2007. McNair had injury problems throughout the year and they bounced back and forth between McNair, Boller, and Troy Smith. The 3 of them combined to go 341/557 for 3,308 yards, 13 TD, 14 INT, and 39 sacks. Flacco went 257/428 for 2,971 yards, 14 TD, 12 INT, and 32 sacks. You are kidding yourself if you think Flacco led them to the championship game. They got there on the strength of a better defense and stronger rushing game (2,376 vs 1,797).

    [b] No one is disputing that but taking away from a player from taking advantage of situations is foolish. Flacco is very solid and played quite well. He can only do what he is asked to do, and he did it almost flawlessly. He won games for his team.

    3. Why is there only hope for Leinart? Young has actually won NFL games, something that until this past week even our very own Rodgers hadn't done.
    Talk to me when Young shows any indication he is turning it around

    Compared to Leinart, who has never done anything, Young has done a lot. Young will get his shot someday. Can't help it if he's under contract and they won't play him. He wants the ball in his hands and has made it clear that he's motivated to play again. Last time he was driven he was ROTY baby!

    4. Manning overrated? Are you crazy? He will probably go down as the best quarterback to walk the earth ever.
    I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are talking about Peyton. Eli is highly overrated.

    [b] What is your source on Eli being overrated? Eli is a very good player too. He has won a superbowl and led the come from behind victory in that game, as well as won 4 playoff games on the road. How many other QBs have done that other than BR? Very, very impressive. Again, he does what he's asked to do.

    5. Big ben overrated? How? Sure, there D is good, but he carries that offense. He has the moxy to win games when it matters (same can be said for VY). Thinking Roethlisberger is overrated says everything we need to know. The guy is a star imo. I would trade Rodgers + any other Packer for Roethlisberger and I would come out WAY ahead over time imo.
    Ben has the benefit of a good defense and running game. Sure, he makes plays in the clutch, but he wouldn't even be in position to make those plays if not for the D. How long will you continue to let VY live off of a few plays he made years ago? Isn't he due to do something this year, or is he gonna ride his reputation all the way to the HOF?

    This is just a ridiculous as the running game and OL basically sucked last year. He got it done on his arm and carried that tema. Guy is a sure fire first ballet HOF in my opinion. He's the third best QB in the league, maybe 2nd since Brady is banged up. His stats aren't guady but they don't need to be. Half of being special is doing what you're asked to do. Especially with a QB.

    6. You might do Rodgers for Roethlisberger and Peterson? You had better execute that trade as fast as you can before the Vikings/Steelers wake up, because Rodgers is a huge step down from either of the other two players involved imo.
    I would trade Rodgers for the 2 of them, but no way would I say Rodgers is a huge step down from Ben

    Well, I'm not going to tell you what to think because you're entitled to your own opinion but there is no way I would take Rodgers over Ben. Rodgers puts up bigger numbers because of the nature of the team, but Ben wins super bowls and carries his team. BR has more come from behind victories in the past x years of any QB (per week 1 NBC broadcast, don't remember the value of x, but it was probably 5-7).

    Rodgers has shown he can put up guady passing numbers with all-world offensive talent around him. What he finally showed the other night is that he can overcome adversity and win a big game. Will he kepe it up? Hopefully, but he still hasn't shown me much in the RS.


    This post is looney.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by hoosier
      Good RBs are a dime a dozen. Good QBs are hard to find. Yes, Peterson is the best RB in the league, but the difference between him and Grant is lesser than the difference between Rodgers and a mediocre QB like Jackson or Rosenfelds. Add to that the undeniable fact (IMHO) that QB is the most important position on the field, and I wouldn't dream of trading Rodgers for Peterson unless I knew the Packers had a strong replacement for ARod.
      That gives good perspective. For an even trade, pick which of these combos you would want:

      Rodgers and Grant
      Jackson and Peterson
      Rivers and Tomlinson
      Roeth and Parker

      For my money, one to give consideration to would be the SD duo...but I'm not sure I'd even rather Tomlinson over Grant at this point, and with what ppl have said about Rivers...
      --
      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by pbmax
        I might not trade Rodgers for Brady. He had a bad injury and is 32. He is at his ceiling and will decline sooner than later. I would need a younger QB. No on Peterson as well.
        If Brady comes back ok, there's nothing to compare to him in the league...and at 32, he likely has 5-6 years left to play.
        --
        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

        Comment


        • #34
          nobody.

          What like 12-15 teams are stable at QB any given year? Every team has one or more untouchable guys. ARod is ours and no way he gets traded for a running back.
          Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Guiness
            Originally posted by hoosier
            Good RBs are a dime a dozen. Good QBs are hard to find. Yes, Peterson is the best RB in the league, but the difference between him and Grant is lesser than the difference between Rodgers and a mediocre QB like Jackson or Rosenfelds. Add to that the undeniable fact (IMHO) that QB is the most important position on the field, and I wouldn't dream of trading Rodgers for Peterson unless I knew the Packers had a strong replacement for ARod.
            That gives good perspective. For an even trade, pick which of these combos you would want:

            Rodgers and Grant
            Jackson and Peterson
            Rivers and Tomlinson
            Roeth and Parker

            For my money, one to give consideration to would be the SD duo...but I'm not sure I'd even rather Tomlinson over Grant at this point, and with what ppl have said about Rivers...
            I could be wrong but my gut feeling is that LT is at a point in his career that is comparable to where Ahman Green was in 2005, the year he got hurt. LT will never be the all-around force he was before last year, when he was both a threat to score every time he touched the ball, a sure bet to pick up tough yardage and an amazing receiver. LT today is like the Thanksgiving turkey the following Monday: it's still good but it just doesn't make you say wow anymore.

            What are people saying about Rivers? Good or bad?

            Comment


            • #36
              Many mentions, even earlier in this thread, that Rivers is an absolute headcase. He got into that shouting match with Cutler last year, I'm not sure what else this is based on.
              --
              Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

              Comment


              • #37
                Nobody.

                Franchise QBs are tough to come by and bringing one in is a potential problem for chemistry issues. It is far too important of a position to not do whatever you can to have a elite QB on your team.

                What it would take for me to make the deal, say with Minny, is AP, a defensive stud like Williams, and a couple of draft picks. It would have to be Herschel Walker all over again. Even then, I only make the deal if I know I have something good for a back up plan at QB. If I thought Flynn could be a really good QB, then I would do it.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Guiness
                  Many mentions, even earlier in this thread, that Rivers is an absolute headcase. He got into that shouting match with Cutler last year, I'm not sure what else this is based on.
                  Shouting match with Cutler.

                  Based on all that has transpired with Cutler, seems like a shouting match proves that Rivers is completely normal.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by pbmax
                    Losing their starting QB threw the team into a tailspin not even Joey Harrington could pull them out of.
                    BOMNF!
                    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Since QB is the most important position in the game I'd consider Aaron untradeable at this point given his age, talent and leadership.

                      However if Albert Haynesworth AND Nnamdi Ashemwhoa (or however the heck you spell it) were offered for Aaron it'd be hard to turn down.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Joe Flacco won the Ravens games, Partial? Seriously? I think Flacco has a bright future, but the Ravens won solely with their defense and sometimes in spite of Flacco. You think Flacco's 3 TDs passes in the final 7 games of the season, including 1 TD in 3 playoff games was the reason they made it to the AFC Championship game? That's laughable. I mean, we're talking about a guy who, until last Sunday, had never thrown for more than 2 TDs in a game.

                        And you'd trade Rodgers for him? Asinine.
                        "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I wouldn't be interested in drafts picks either as they're a crap shoot.

                          I'd need two proven studs at value positions that were both under the age of 27.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by BallHawk
                            Joe Flacco won the Ravens games, Partial? Seriously? I think Flacco has a bright future, but the Ravens won solely with their defense and sometimes in spite of Flacco. You think Flacco's 3 TDs passes in the final 7 games of the season, including 1 TD in 3 playoff games was the reason they made it to the AFC Championship game? That's laughable. I mean, we're talking about a guy who, until last Sunday, had never thrown for more than 2 TDs in a game.

                            And you'd trade Rodgers for him? Asinine.
                            I did not say I would trade Rodgers for him, for one, and while he may not have been carrying the team on his back, he put up a W because he didn't play outside of his capabilities and lose the game.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Wouldn't trade Rodgers for anyone.

                              Ryan's solid, Flacco's a downgrade, Young's got issues, Cutler's way too wild.

                              RBs aren't worth trading a franchise QB for.
                              All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I think I'd stand pat with Rodgers for now....AP is tempting but I think long haul you stick with Rodgers.
                                C.H.U.D.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X