Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Donald Driver

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Waldo
    Originally posted by bobblehead
    for anyone questioning DD's hands I have one thing to say:

    ZERO: The number of dropped passes by DD in 2008!
    64.3 - The % of targeted passes Don caught in 2008.

    69.0 - The % of targeted passes Jones caught in 2008.

    And if you are want to argue that Jones caught more dumpoffs and Don caught tougher passes, each one averaged 13.7 YPR last year. Each pass on average gained the same number of yards between the two players.
    I'm not knocking JJ...as a matter of fact I was making a comment regarding dropped passes=ZERO. I love JJ, have said so many times. Openly said he is a better reciever than Jordy. % of targeted passes caught can be affected by many things besides the recievers ability, but I think you know this already. I'm not declariing JJ or DD a better reciever at this point, but simply saying DD's hands can't be argued as he dropped ZERO passes in '08.
    The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Waldo
      The way people recall non statistic based football data is really weird. Instead of remembering minor parts of many plays, people tend to recall fairly vivid details of only a few, and base their evaluations of players almost solely on these few plays.
      For example, I remember Reggie White as a Left DE for the time he launched Cris Carter about 8 yards upfield with one arm.
      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        The other thing that the % of targeted passes caught doesn't show (besides who was covering him and what type of coverage he had) ....
        If I was the coach, I am not sure I would care about who was in coverage or what coverage was being played. To evaluate the player in a game setting, they will need to battle both elements and win their share, whether they are the No. 1 receiver or No. 3.

        Absent specifics matchups coaches like or want to avoid, the offense has far less control over the coverage than anything else it does.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Waldo
          Originally posted by pbmax
          Originally posted by retailguy
          Originally posted by Freak Out
          He used to wear those black neoprene looking forearm things and when they were wet he would fumble more....allegedly.
          I've always thought that it was the fact that he always carried the ball in his left arm. Most RB's switch arms based on where the hit/pressure comes from. I always believed it led to an opportunity to dislodge the ball that didn't happen as often with most other RB's.
          The neoprene vs. standard white pads were the second explanation offered by Sherman regarding how they were going to deal with the fumbles. Sherm felt he sweat too much for neoprene to be effective. I would hate to be the guy measuring that test.

          Football Outsiders has 2009 Jennings at a catch rate of 75% and Driver at 57%. Jones not listed, not enough catches to make the list.

          2008: GJ 57%, DD 64%, JN 61%, Jones 67%

          2007: Jennings 63%, 67%, Jones 59%, RM 57%, KR 62%

          2006: DD 53%, GJ 43%, RM 49%, KR 44%, RF 38%

          These are all catch rates. The play by play does not count drops. I can't believe Driver had no drops last year, as we dropped passes in every game I can remember. but someone is going to have to comb through McGinn's season ending wrapup to find his numbers for drops.
          2009 #'s probably aren't a very good guide. Jones and Jordy haven't yet caught any passes.

          Anyway, I got McGinn's analysis bookmarked:

          Donald Driver dropped seven of 113 (6.2%)


          LIS though, there is a fundamental problem with the drop stat. It is a judgement call as to what is and isn't catchable, and it fails to take into account that some WR's are better than others at getting their hands to touch the ball, and there is a fairly significant difference. (for example, Chi's WR's, they don't get drops for the times the stopped on a route, but that still affects their catch %).
          Dang, wish I had bookmarked the JS article I read that quoted zero for DD, but I believe in McGinn and will humbly stand corrected. I read that article the same day I posted the zero drops too.
          The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by pbmax
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
            The other thing that the % of targeted passes caught doesn't show (besides who was covering him and what type of coverage he had) ....
            If I was the coach, I am not sure I would care about who was in coverage or what coverage was being played. To evaluate the player in a game setting, they will need to battle both elements and win their share, whether they are the No. 1 receiver or No. 3.

            Absent specifics matchups coaches like or want to avoid, the offense has far less control over the coverage than anything else it does.
            Not to mention,

            Packer fans in many respects still see football, defense especially though a Bob Sanders lens.

            It isn't normal for a CB to cover a single WR all game. Most OC's are always looking for the defensive keys that will isolate their top WR's on a S, TE on a LB deep, etc...

            Sure a guy may see better coverage most of the game, but the bulk of the passes most WR's get is when they are in favorable matchups or have clearly beaten their coverage.

            In other words, items like catch %, YPR, and TD% are not overly affected by coverage.

            A Vikings fan elsewhere has done a similar study of Brett's WR's in Mn, NY, and Chad's in Miami and we compared notes (I have GB WR data); contrary to popular belief, there is no evidence that the QB has much, if any, impact on catch %, YPR, or TD%. Those items seem to follow the WR's and are not greatly influenced by the passer.

            Comment


            • #51
              LOVE this cat
              They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

              Brew Crew in 2011!!!

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                LOVE this cat


                Nothing there NOT to love!! :P

                Comment


                • #53
                  at least HE came to play!
                  They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

                  Brew Crew in 2011!!!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                    at least HE came to play!
                    He and Woodson.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      the man
                      They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

                      Brew Crew in 2011!!!

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by GrnBay007
                        Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                        at least HE came to play!
                        He and Woodson.
                        Mos Def
                        They said God has a Tim Tebow complex!

                        Brew Crew in 2011!!!

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Donald Driver is now just 9 catches away from setting the all time Packers receptions mark.



                          Probably won't happen in St. Louis, but rather in Minnesota next week. Which is appropriate, since 99% of those receptions came off the arm of one Brett Favre. And the poor Vikings fans will once again see another Packer all-time record breaking celebration @ The Dump. How cool is that?!
                          Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by GrnBay007
                            Originally posted by MOBB DEEP
                            LOVE this cat


                            Nothing there NOT to love!! :P
                            Wow! DD gets 'diced and sliced' @ Packerrats.

                            ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                            ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                            ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                            ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Gunakor
                              Donald Driver is now just 9 catches away from setting the all time Packers receptions mark.



                              Probably won't happen in St. Louis, but rather in Minnesota next week. Which is appropriate, since 99% of those receptions came off the arm of one Brett Favre. And the poor Vikings fans will once again see another Packer all-time record breaking celebration @ The Dump. How cool is that?!
                              I say just toss DD on Defense and Favre can throw him his all time packer reception breaker
                              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X