Great article on insider

[pbmax]

Re: Great article on insider

Grant lacks vision and cut ability and is basically just a guy. We could pick up a lot of guys off the street to do what he does. (were you one of the rats who was demanding TT pay him?).

He also speculates that this is not the same Grant as 2007, that all he can do is cut and run but he has no burst left. Speculation follows that he has lost some burst to the injury. As for Partial Says He Sucks < Just A Guy < Stephen Jackson (the point of comparison in the article), there is a lot of room between those three levels.

Said 6 of 28 run plays were blocked well.

His summation of the O Line only contained this revelation. He gives Barbre no credit for holding Little off during the sack when Rodgers held the ball for quite a long time. He pins the decision to chip Little with Lee to this problem, but I think they were in expanded protection before that sack. I could be wrong, don't have the tape.

Said our Nose can't demand a double, and hawk and barnett can't get off blocks very well. Said kampman often looks lost and Clay Mathews is going to be a real player in a year. Said hawk is never going to be good in the passing game and Bishop made some plays in the limited time he was given.

He did say this about Pickett and I agree. But Pickett is not asked to two gap every play, so it becomes a game to figure out what he is supposed to do and discern when he fails. Pickett has made good hay on a technique where he leverages his shoulder into the center and forces a stalemate with one free arm and leg to make a play. This clogs a gap and gives you half a nose to tackle with. That is progress I would think. Also, possibly, anatomically impossible.

He says Kampman looks "strange" with his back to the LOS "like a fish out of water". No specific criticism of him in coverage but he does say they lack a consistent pass rush from the OLBs, which I think is mostly correct.

[packerbacker1234]

Hard to say Grant sucks, then mention how only 6 runs wre actually blocked well.

Not only that, isn't he average 3.8 yards a carry? How is that bad? That means on three runs, he would average a first down.

So, I am a bit lost here.

[PlantPage55]

At least the scout isn't spouting the popular JSO comment section bullshit about how "TT has ignored building the line" - he sees how many upper draft picks have been added. Putting aside whether TT has hit on the picks or not - you can't say he has ignored the line. That is a lie.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I was preaching that Grant sucks in the game thread. Everyone got on top of me in a mean, vicious way telling me how wrong and dumb I was. Turns out the professionals and I see eye to eye.

While I said i was done with your trolling, Ty is going to take this opportunity to instruct you...in the hope that it will be constructive. Ty doubts it...prove Ty wrong.

1. You said he sucks. Eric said he is just a guy. There is a big difference between what you said and what he said. Now, perhaps your point woulda been made, you woulda seemed logical, and you wouldn't have inflamed everybody against you if you had simply said "grant is exceedingly average, pedestrian"....that is a more sane approach, and more accurate. Cause if Grant sucks..then what does Samkon Gado do?

2. The forum notes your ability to jump on Grant, yet the professional notes that the line only successfully blocked 6 out of 28 runs well. This would have been a perfect time for you to admit your assesment of the line was off...and that while Grant in your opinion was "average/pedestrian" he surely wasn't helped by the crappy job his line is doing. See, then you come across as fair..and you still get to promote Grant as average.

3. Now, we all see you noting the professional as credible to support your view of Grant. What we don't see is you now coming clean and noting the professional's opinion of Rodgers..which pretty much assails your viewpoint...playing well and tough as nails. No injury, no horrible...PLAYING WELL.

Now, you have a choice..you can act like partial 1.0 and continue to selectively pull info from a professional that agrees with you...or you can be partial 2.0 and say...hmm, if i'm going to use this guy...i gotta use all of him..cause if i don't, then i'm just bsing.

Your choice.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

please tell me cheesner that you aren't suggesting Eric B is in anyway comparable with an NFL coach....fuck, the guy isn't even coaching D3 college ball.

Anyone can coach college ball at the division 3 level.


We are talking Ashwaubenon High here. The big time.

D3 coaches can't even spell ashwa..."fuckit, i'm not recruiting the kid"

[pbmax]

Hard to say Grant sucks, then mention how only 6 runs wre actually blocked well.

It does mark the difference between Stephen Jackson and Grant. Jackson plays behind a line not much better (if at all), but often found a hole on his own.

There is no reason not to continue to look for RBs to supplant Grant. Contract or no, he is eminently replaceable.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Hard to say Grant sucks, then mention how only 6 runs wre actually blocked well.

It does mark the difference between Stephen Jackson and Grant. Jackson plays behind a line not much better (if at all), but often found a hole on his own.

There is no reason not to continue to look for RBs to supplant Grant. Contract or no, he is eminently replaceable.

You are underestimating the Ram's line...which has more veterans on it. And, for what it's worth..more high picks.

[mraynrand]

please tell me cheesner that you aren't suggesting Eric B is in anyway comparable with an NFL coach....fuck, the guy isn't even coaching D3 college ball.

Anyone can coach college ball at the division 3 level.


We are talking Ashwaubenon High here. The big time.

D3 coaches can't even spell ashwa..."fuckit, i'm not recruiting the kid"

Assistant high school coaches can't spell - or write - either - that's why they have sort-of-retired columnists do it for them.

[Partial]

I was preaching that Grant sucks in the game thread. Everyone got on top of me in a mean, vicious way telling me how wrong and dumb I was. Turns out the professionals and I see eye to eye.

While I said i was done with your trolling, Ty is going to take this opportunity to instruct you...in the hope that it will be constructive. Ty doubts it...prove Ty wrong.

1. You said he sucks. Eric said he is just a guy. There is a big difference between what you said and what he said. Now, perhaps your point woulda been made, you woulda seemed logical, and you wouldn't have inflamed everybody against you if you had simply said "grant is exceedingly average, pedestrian"....that is a more sane approach, and more accurate. Cause if Grant sucks..then what does Samkon Gado do?

2. The forum notes your ability to jump on Grant, yet the professional notes that the line only successfully blocked 6 out of 28 runs well. This would have been a perfect time for you to admit your assesment of the line was off...and that while Grant in your opinion was "average/pedestrian" he surely wasn't helped by the crappy job his line is doing. See, then you come across as fair..and you still get to promote Grant as average.

3. Now, we all see you noting the professional as credible to support your view of Grant. What we don't see is you now coming clean and noting the professional's opinion of Rodgers..which pretty much assails your viewpoint...playing well and tough as nails. No injury, no horrible...PLAYING WELL.

Now, you have a choice..you can act like partial 1.0 and continue to selectively pull info from a professional that agrees with you...or you can be partial 2.0 and say...hmm, if i'm going to use this guy...i gotta use all of him..cause if i don't, then i'm just bsing.

Your choice.

1. There is not just a difference between just a guy and sucking in my opinion. If you want to debate that, go ahead, but I will not.\

2. I didn't even read the article skimmed the first post, I don't have that sort of time.

3. Professional opinions are supporting my theory of Rodgers being average. See the article of Scouts opinions by Bob McGinn averaging out to 19 and than more this off-season.

That is all.

[Partial]

I was preaching that Grant sucks in the game thread. Everyone got on top of me in a mean, vicious way telling me how wrong and dumb I was. Turns out the professionals and I see eye to eye.

In another thread you wrote that you would be turning over a new leaf and no longer engaging in uncivil back and forths with other posters. If I can offer you some unsolicited advice, it would be that reminding others that you were right and they were wrong is equally unproductive. The same goes for rehashing how everyone else in the forum wronged you. Just let the evidence speak for itself.

To be frank, it's unfair the standard that I'm held to compared to others. I have been personally attacked 40+ times in the past several days. How many times have I personally attacked? Once.

It's just funny how I can say something and everyone goes "that guy is an idiot", then when a trained professional says it they say "Like Shattner, I can get behind that".

[falco]

That is all.

promise?

[Partial]

That is all.

promise?

This is 6-7 in the past day. Can we please ban this spammer?

[Iron Mike]

We are talking Ashwaubenon High here. The big time.

My nephew played HS ball at Ashwaubenon....would you value HIS opinion as to the efficacy of Baranczyk's ability to evaluate talent??

[sheepshead]

Turns out the professionals....


Here he is, Eric Baranczykrofessional assistant high school coach

Is this guy still around? Next.

[sheepshead]

That is all.

promise?

This is 6-7 in the past day. Can we please ban this spammer?