Excuses made for Packer Fans By Packer Fans

[mraynrand]

Greg Bedard was talking about the Packers woes today on WSSP, and he said the number one thing has to be Rodgers and the OL. He was talking about despite his numbers, that Rodgers has not looked very good because he has fell in love with his numbers and the long ball.

Greg Bedard is most likely dead wrong. His argument consists of reading other people's minds. Too bad the reporter cannot create a reasonable scenario from actual facts available.

Numbers look good, Rodgers looks uncomfortable and holds ball too long, OL giving up sacks ergo: Rodgers has fallen in love with his stats.

Bedard is a moron if this version of his contention is accurate.

I'm on board the "Bedard Is A Moron" bandwagon. Have been for a while.

Can someone explain to me, in a realistic way, how Rodgers is going for the stats and not the win? If you want stats, you don't hold the ball and get sacked. That's not good for your stats. Also, don't we WANT good stats from our QB? It generally HELPS you win, not hinders you.

I fell in love with my numbers too, when I was getting creamed by a D lineman in 1.2 seconds. 8 times. Bedard can go fuck himself. Putz.

[Cheesehead Craig]

Greg Bedard was talking about the Packers woes today on WSSP, and he said the number one thing has to be Rodgers and the OL. He was talking about despite his numbers, that Rodgers has not looked very good because he has fell in love with his numbers and the long ball.

Greg Bedard is most likely dead wrong. His argument consists of reading other people's minds. Too bad the reporter cannot create a reasonable scenario from actual facts available.

Numbers look good, Rodgers looks uncomfortable and holds ball too long, OL giving up sacks ergo: Rodgers has fallen in love with his stats.

Bedard is a moron if this version of his contention is accurate.

I'm on board the "Bedard Is A Moron" bandwagon. Have been for a while.

Can someone explain to me, in a realistic way, how Rodgers is going for the stats and not the win? If you want stats, you don't hold the ball and get sacked. That's not good for your stats. Also, don't we WANT good stats from our QB? It generally HELPS you win, not hinders you.

I fell in love with my numbers too, when I was getting creamed by a D lineman in 1.2 seconds. 8 times. Bedard can go fuck himself. Putz.

Bedard's no Tauscher.

[get louder at lambeau]

Greg Bedard was talking about the Packers woes today on WSSP, and he said the number one thing has to be Rodgers and the OL. He was talking about despite his numbers, that Rodgers has not looked very good because he has fell in love with his numbers and the long ball.

Greg Bedard is most likely dead wrong. His argument consists of reading other people's minds. Too bad the reporter cannot create a reasonable scenario from actual facts available.

Numbers look good, Rodgers looks uncomfortable and holds ball too long, OL giving up sacks ergo: Rodgers has fallen in love with his stats.

Bedard is a moron if this version of his contention is accurate.

I'm on board the "Bedard Is A Moron" bandwagon. Have been for a while.

Can someone explain to me, in a realistic way, how Rodgers is going for the stats and not the win? If you want stats, you don't hold the ball and get sacked. That's not good for your stats. Also, don't we WANT good stats from our QB? It generally HELPS you win, not hinders you.

I fell in love with my numbers too, when I was getting creamed by a D lineman in 1.2 seconds. 8 times. Bedard can go fuck himself. Putz.

Bedard's no Tauscher.

Bedard is more of a Mike Vandermause than anything else.

[bobblehead]

Greg Bedard was talking about the Packers woes today on WSSP, and he said the number one thing has to be Rodgers and the OL. He was talking about despite his numbers, that Rodgers has not looked very good because he has fell in love with his numbers and the long ball.

He said the number two problem is obviously the OL as they don't have a backup plan to Chad for the short or long term.

He said the number three problem is the secondary. They are still picking up the defense and have blown a coverage for a TD in each game according to him.

He said that the next Packer to likely be vocal and 'pop' is Jennings, who is evidently very fed up with not getting the ball and disgusted with the way things are going.

WSSP guys thought it would be Grant would be go off, as he seems to be generally very unhappy with his role in offense according to his Twitter account.

Just callin 'em as they report 'em.

Jennings has no reason to "Pop". He rounds a route out and costs his QB an INT and he wonders why his QB isn't going to throw the ball to him more. Jennings is also seeing the majority of the double teams this year instead of DD. If DD held onto all of the balls that are coming his way this year Jennings would be seeing less double coverage.

And before we start arguing, Jennings screwed the pooch on his route. ARod shouldn't have thrown the ball in to the tight coverage, but he placed it exactly were he was supposed to, low and to the outside. Jennings on an out patern let the CB get outside of him. A position he couldn't give up. I think Jennings thought the coverage was good so he figured Arod wasn't going to throw it to him and he dogged the end of the route.

This was my take as well. Imagine it being Robert Furgeson and BF, all you would be hearing is how the reciever didn't cut his route OR fight for the ball. Honestly, the throw wasn't bad at all, he threw it into single coverage on the sideline in a position the reciever should have been the only one to make the play.

This stuff breeds itself too, later in the game he checks down to Wynn who drops the pass, then on 3rd and 6-7 he turns to check it again, wynn is wide open and probably can get the first, ARod turns a different direction and is sacked. Guys gotta have confidence that other guys are going to make a play.

I'm not absolving Rodgers here, as he lost confidence in a lot of guys and started not trusting the reads....gotta have a short memory in the NFL.

[bobblehead]

Yes, rodgers has to get rid of the ball more quickly. Yet what was one of the beefs last year?

He checked down too quickly, didn't wait for the big play to open up...

So what do we want here, people?

16 wins in the regular season, all by at least two scores, with the Packers never trailing in any game. Then a cake walk through the playoffs to a blow out Superbowl victory. is that asking too much? I don't think so. I deserve it.

I also don't want to pay to put gas in my car or food on my table....praise the day!!!

[gex]

So which Reporters are the ones that know what they are talking about?
Anybody have a list compiled of the guyus that are worth reading and the ones that are complete hacks?

Worthy ................ Hack

.................................Bedard

[bobblehead]

So which Reporters are the ones that know what they are talking about?
Anybody have a list compiled of the guyus that are worth reading and the ones that are complete hacks?

Worthy ................ Hack

.................................Bedard

I kinda like Bedard and McGinn. I think most people will like those they agree with and dislike the ones they don't....ya know, human nature and all.

[MOBB DEEP]

I just love listening to former/future coaches break things down...who better?

Herm edwards, cowher, even gruden

[gex]

I just love listening to former/future coaches break things down...who better?

Herm edwards, cowher, even gruden

I agree, did you listen to Gruden talk about how incredible the throws were that Favre was making Monday night? That was great commentary by a professional who knows what he is saying.

[GrnBay007]

I just love listening to former/future coaches break things down...who better?

Herm edwards, cowher, even gruden

I agree, did you listen to Gruden talk about how incredible the throws were that Favre was making Monday night? That was great commentary by a professional who knows what he is saying.

Thought it was funny in the Gruden/Favre interview they showed before the game when Gruden said he and quite a few coaches need to thank him for getting better jobs.

[pbmax]

If Herm Edwards comes to Green Bay to do anything other than color commentary, fish or change planes, I will lay across the 50 yard line so games cannot be played. And I believe I will have company.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

I just love listening to former/future coaches break things down...who better?

Herm edwards, cowher, even gruden

I agree, did you listen to Gruden talk about how incredible the throws were that Favre was making Monday night? That was great commentary by a professional who knows what he is saying.

those kinds of pros are usually found in nice hotels or on the "sets" in Orange County.

Biggest blowjob on national TV since Monica Lewinsky. Sure hope no kids were watching.

[mraynrand]

I say no to Mike sHerman Edwards.

[Kiwon]

Hey, Shermy is 3-1 at Texas A&M.

.750 winning percentage

[ThunderDan]

Hey, Shermy is 3-1 at Texas A&M.

.750 winning percentage

That can only be this year.

Blown out 47-9 by Arkansas this year. 4-8 last year.

That puts Mike at a solid 7-9 heading to 10-14 at years end.