It's not what many of us more optimistic posters expected at this point, and it's not what anyone here wants.
I am most disappointed in the penalties and the play of the offensive line.
Again, I'll say it: there's time for this team to get to that 10-6 and the playoffs place, as long as there are no major injuries.
If there are no major injuries but the team finishes at 7-9 or worse - even if they win their last two or three - then it might be time for the team to can MM, and perhaps Thompson.
In some regards, the worst scenario - as someone here has pointed out - would be a healthy team and an 8-8 or 9-7 finish, where the team misses the playoffs but finishes strong.
Then what? Do you give MM and TT another season - the idea they finished strong, the line will be experienced, all that - or do you say, y'know, it's been five years, and MM and TT just don't have the team moving in the right direction?
That might be the toughest call. I'm not even sure where I'd stand. I generally think a GM should be given five years - I think rebuilding done right takes time, sorry - but if the team stays relatively healthy but finishes 9-7, even if they win their last three or four in a row - man, I don't know.
Guess I'll know more as the season progresses.
I am most disappointed in the penalties and the play of the offensive line.
Again, I'll say it: there's time for this team to get to that 10-6 and the playoffs place, as long as there are no major injuries.
If there are no major injuries but the team finishes at 7-9 or worse - even if they win their last two or three - then it might be time for the team to can MM, and perhaps Thompson.
In some regards, the worst scenario - as someone here has pointed out - would be a healthy team and an 8-8 or 9-7 finish, where the team misses the playoffs but finishes strong.
Then what? Do you give MM and TT another season - the idea they finished strong, the line will be experienced, all that - or do you say, y'know, it's been five years, and MM and TT just don't have the team moving in the right direction?
That might be the toughest call. I'm not even sure where I'd stand. I generally think a GM should be given five years - I think rebuilding done right takes time, sorry - but if the team stays relatively healthy but finishes 9-7, even if they win their last three or four in a row - man, I don't know.
Guess I'll know more as the season progresses.


Comment