Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First Chink in the Kids Armour?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: First Chink in the Kids Armour?

    Originally posted by g4orce
    Originally posted by Sactopackfan
    Originally posted by g4orce
    Originally posted by Scott Campbell
    Originally posted by g4orce

    I listened to Arod's press conference. He sounds whinny.

    He sounds like a horse?

    Of course you'd deflect. You offer nothing to any discussing, ever.
    Is this a discussion, or is this just a lame thread based on a weak projection of what Aaron Rodgers said?

    Its very much a discussion. Why don't you add to it instead of these lame shots like SC.
    Lame shots? Look at the topic of this thread....

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by g4orce
      Originally posted by Scott Campbell
      Somebody is always going to over-react and read way much into it.

      This is the funniest thing I've ever read on here.


      Ever?

      Aren't you over reacting again?

      Comment


      • #18
        This thread blows.

        Comment


        • #19
          back to the topic haha! I think the kids cracking and he hasnt even got to the tougher games yet. This could be a disaster for a young QB.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: First Chink in the Kids Armour?

            Originally posted by Sactopackfan
            Originally posted by g4orce
            Originally posted by Scott Campbell
            Originally posted by g4orce

            I listened to Arod's press conference. He sounds whinny.

            He sounds like a horse?

            Of course you'd deflect. You offer nothing to any discussing, ever.
            Is this a discussion, or is this just a lame thread based on a weak projection of what Aaron Rodgers said?

            You can say that again.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by g4orce
              This could be a disaster for a young QB.


              A disaster?

              I think you're over reacting again.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by g4orce
                Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                Somebody is always going to over-react and read way much into it.

                This is the funniest thing I've ever read on here. You, of all people, you... ha ha ha ha hilarious.
                I thought you weren't allowed to get banned and then make a new profile.
                70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                  Originally posted by g4orce
                  This could be a disaster for a young QB.


                  A disaster?

                  I think you're over reacting again.

                  You don't think a young QB could turn into a disaster if he starts coming with a bad attitude and it has a tumble effect on the whole team? This season could effect Rodgers as a QB for his entire career.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Nothing he said is questioned on truth, what is questioned is this: In his worst game of his career... why isn't he taking the blame? Each one of his ints were just as much of a momentum swing, if not worse, then any of the moments he mentioned.


                    Up 7 - 0, hadn them a int that give sthem a free score. Driving, throw a int deep in the endzone into tripple coverage to end our threat to put the game really out of reach.

                    Game winning "chance" in end, throw a high ball on 4th down for a int return for a TD to seal the victory and cap the game.


                    What I am getting at here, is when your starting QB plays bad, even when he plays average or good, you want him to shoulder the blame for the loss. That is what a good leader does, takes the heat. Seems he passed the heat off the the special teams instead, when arguably we can stare at Rodgers and say "buddy, you lost us the game". Yeah, it's all three phases, but we lost the turnover battle I think for the first time this year.

                    WHo's fault was that?

                    *cough* Rodgers. Not going to win many games where you throw 3 ints.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I honestly don't see anything wrong or anything to worry about from Rodgers comments. Not at all. this thread is much to do about nadda.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by packerbacker1234
                        Nothing he said is questioned on truth, what is questioned is this: In his worst game of his career... why isn't he taking the blame? Each one of his ints were just as much of a momentum swing, if not worse, then any of the moments he mentioned.


                        Up 7 - 0, hadn them a int that give sthem a free score. Driving, throw a int deep in the endzone into tripple coverage to end our threat to put the game really out of reach.

                        Game winning "chance" in end, throw a high ball on 4th down for a int return for a TD to seal the victory and cap the game.


                        What I am getting at here, is when your starting QB plays bad, even when he plays average or good, you want him to shoulder the blame for the loss. That is what a good leader does, takes the heat. Seems he passed the heat off the the special teams instead, when arguably we can stare at Rodgers and say "buddy, you lost us the game". Yeah, it's all three phases, but we lost the turnover battle I think for the first time this year.

                        WHo's fault was that?

                        *cough* Rodgers. Not going to win many games where you throw 3 ints.
                        Sure learned that the past 16 years.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by packerbacker1234
                          Nothing he said is questioned on truth, what is questioned is this: In his worst game of his career... why isn't he taking the blame? Each one of his ints were just as much of a momentum swing, if not worse, then any of the moments he mentioned.


                          Up 7 - 0, hadn them a int that give sthem a free score. Driving, throw a int deep in the endzone into tripple coverage to end our threat to put the game really out of reach.

                          Game winning "chance" in end, throw a high ball on 4th down for a int return for a TD to seal the victory and cap the game.


                          What I am getting at here, is when your starting QB plays bad, even when he plays average or good, you want him to shoulder the blame for the loss. That is what a good leader does, takes the heat. Seems he passed the heat off the the special teams instead, when arguably we can stare at Rodgers and say "buddy, you lost us the game". Yeah, it's all three phases, but we lost the turnover battle I think for the first time this year.

                          WHo's fault was that?

                          *cough* Rodgers. Not going to win many games where you throw 3 ints.

                          This is what I felt too. He shoulda man'd up and took the heat, came out against Dallas and tore em up.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Packers4Glory
                            I honestly don't see anything wrong or anything to worry about from Rodgers comments. Not at all. this thread is much to do about nadda.


                            This thread is a lame attempt by people with an ax to grind to whine about the guy that they think cost Favre his job here. IMO

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by g4orce
                              back to the topic haha! I think the kids cracking and he hasnt even got to the tougher games yet. This could be a disaster for a young QB.
                              You mean you are hoping. Funny thing is BF constantly complained about recievers running the wrong routes when he threw interceptions....or in Ferguson's case he didn't "fight for the ball hard enough".

                              Rodgers has been overly polite with his teammates. He has been a diplomat all year. Its time a leader on this team calls out guys who aren't making plays.

                              He threw 3 interceptions today (2 bad ones). I bet he wants them back. When he said "we" gave them a short field I think he was including those picks.

                              He also isn't a "young" quarterback, he has been around the league a bit now. He is a recent starter, but his mental maturity is miles ahead of a Mark Sanchez or any other rookie.

                              Our team has MANY problems right now, but ARod is pretty low on the list. Problem is people keep saying he is too protective, he doesn't take chances, almost like his lack of interceptions is a big negative. He hears that crap and today he played the way people wanted him to, and we lost to an 0-7 team....I'll take the "conservative" arod that isn't a "winner" cuz special teams, the OL, and the running game suck.

                              edit: Oh yea, ty is right...this thread blows.
                              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by g4orce
                                back to the topic haha! I think the kids cracking and he hasnt even got to the tougher games yet. This could be a disaster for a young QB.
                                I think Madtown was right.
                                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X