First Chink in the Kids Armour?

[g4orce]

"Chester's an excellent receiver. I thought it was a good call. We were moving the ball well at the time. Things happen," Favre said. "We struggled a little in the red zone today obviously. That will be a point of emphasis not only for us but for me this week."




I would have like to seen Favre take responsibility for puking up 14 4th quarter points for the Steelers two weeks ago.




There, now I sound nearly as stupid as you two.

knew it'd be only a matter of time before u attacked him. Classy as always.

Maybe Favre should have said "I need to be more careful with the ball, so that I don't score 14 points for the other team in the 4th quarter".

Why is what Favre says more acceptable than what Rodgers says?

Paco Bert

just stop towards me. I do not care about ur favre hatred, we get it, u don't like him.. Now move along. This thread has nothing to do with him. Get the hatred outta ur heart and move on. He has.

[Scott Campbell]

It's the exact same thing.

[channtheman]

"Chester's an excellent receiver. I thought it was a good call. We were moving the ball well at the time. Things happen," Favre said. "We struggled a little in the red zone today obviously. That will be a point of emphasis not only for us but for me this week."




I would have like to seen Favre take responsibility for puking up 14 4th quarter points for the Steelers two weeks ago.




There, now I sound nearly as stupid as you two.

knew it'd be only a matter of time before u attacked him. Classy as always.

Maybe Favre should have said "I need to be more careful with the ball, so that I don't score 14 points for the other team in the 4th quarter".

Why is what Favre says more acceptable than what Rodgers says?

Paco Bert

just stop towards me. I do not care about ur favre hatred, we get it, u don't like him.. Now move along. This thread has nothing to do with him. Get the hatred outta ur heart and move on. He has.

Just stop towards you? WTF did you seriously expect making a topic about a complete and total non issue?

[g4orce]

"Chester's an excellent receiver. I thought it was a good call. We were moving the ball well at the time. Things happen," Favre said. "We struggled a little in the red zone today obviously. That will be a point of emphasis not only for us but for me this week."




I would have like to seen Favre take responsibility for puking up 14 4th quarter points for the Steelers two weeks ago.




There, now I sound nearly as stupid as you two.

knew it'd be only a matter of time before u attacked him. Classy as always.

Maybe Favre should have said "I need to be more careful with the ball, so that I don't score 14 points for the other team in the 4th quarter".

Why is what Favre says more acceptable than what Rodgers says?

Paco Bert

just stop towards me. I do not care about ur favre hatred, we get it, u don't like him.. Now move along. This thread has nothing to do with him. Get the hatred outta ur heart and move on. He has.

Just stop towards you? WTF did you seriously expect making a topic about a complete and total non issue?

maybe its a non issue to you, and thats great, but to me and a couple other people it might be. Is that ok with you? That others might have a different opinion on the matter? Is it really a big deal to you or SC that some discuss it, that our QB might be changing before our eyes? It shouldnt hurt your feelings, if you dont like it, simply dont read it or dont reply to it. Not that hard.

[Scott Campbell]

maybe its a non issue to you, and thats great, but to me and a couple other people it might be. Is that ok with you? That others might have a different opinion on the matter? Is it really a big deal to you or SC that some discuss it, that our QB might be changing before our eyes? It shouldnt hurt your feelings, if you dont like it, simply dont read it or dont reply to it. Not that hard.

Start your own board if you want to censor replies.

The rest of us here have a right to respond to trolling.

[channtheman]

"Chester's an excellent receiver. I thought it was a good call. We were moving the ball well at the time. Things happen," Favre said. "We struggled a little in the red zone today obviously. That will be a point of emphasis not only for us but for me this week."




I would have like to seen Favre take responsibility for puking up 14 4th quarter points for the Steelers two weeks ago.




There, now I sound nearly as stupid as you two.

knew it'd be only a matter of time before u attacked him. Classy as always.

Maybe Favre should have said "I need to be more careful with the ball, so that I don't score 14 points for the other team in the 4th quarter".

Why is what Favre says more acceptable than what Rodgers says?

Paco Bert

just stop towards me. I do not care about ur favre hatred, we get it, u don't like him.. Now move along. This thread has nothing to do with him. Get the hatred outta ur heart and move on. He has.

Just stop towards you? WTF did you seriously expect making a topic about a complete and total non issue?

maybe its a non issue to you, and thats great, but to me and a couple other people it might be. Is that ok with you? That others might have a different opinion on the matter? Is it really a big deal to you or SC that some discuss it, that our QB might be changing before our eyes? It shouldnt hurt your feelings, if you dont like it, simply dont read it or dont reply to it. Not that hard.

Actually I only recall Partial agreeing, and that's because we all know that he and you both want Rodgers to fail and fall flat on his ass. Rodgers is the most scrutinized QB I've ever seen. Never did I see Favre take any of this when he would lose a game by throwing 5 or 6 interceptions.

[g4orce]

Actually I only recall Partial agreeing, and that's because we all know that he and you both want Rodgers to fail and fall flat on his ass. Rodgers is the most scrutinized QB I've ever seen. Never did I see Favre take any of this when he would lose a game by throwing 5 or 6 interceptions.

Partial isnt the only one to agree. But I see this is an emotional topic for you. I also know that Favre was picked on a lot, still is, for anything he has ever said and done. It comes with the territory. Oh and I don't want to see Rodgers fail, I like him.. met him, enjoyed talking to him. I like his athletic side. Hate that he pisses himself in the clutch, but I'm really hoping something clicks. I'm just not going to give him a free pass for stupid play nor not coming thru when we need him.

[Zool]

Also this title is completely racist.

[Scott Campbell]

Also this title is completely racist.

[Pugger]

"we" didnt make enough plays on offense? How about I didn't make the plays when I had to, to win this game. I failed in the clutch, again, and its unacceptable. Something to that sort.

Blah, blah, blah. I didn't see him, its the winds fault= excuse.

Felt good about the 2nd one? you forced it into coverage for no reason.

Oh and the last one, had the ball in my hands, could put the team on my back and win a friggin game for once but nope, just tossed it cuz it was desperation mode. Oh and he still felt good about it.

haha shits laughable.

That's an awfully bold font for a pronoun disagreement. So we have gone from the kid is cracking up, to the kid is blaming everyone else, to the kid is referring to his efforts on offense as "we". Interesting.

Would you have preferred Rodgers just have said "I was just trying to make a play."?

the guy took no responsibility at all. He was terrible when it counted and took zero responsibility and had a bunch of excuses to the press for the first time that I can remember which goes towards my whole point of the thread that he's changing before our eyes. Couple more games like that and it'll be even worse IMO. One of the things I've liked about Arod is that he hasn't been a baby thru anything. Well here was step one towards becoming an excuse guy. MM must really be wearing off on him.

Huh??? I read your first post in this thread and I didn't see any excuses from AR. He spoke the truth. He said his INTs and the STs breakdowns were the difference in that game that gave Tampa a short field. I can understand if you want to search for things to rag on AR because he isn't BF but this thread is ridiculous.

[MichiganPackerFan]

...but this thread is ridiculous.

C'mon Pugger: ty & I already argued this out and concluded that this thread sucks. However it does taste great and allegedly is less filling as well.

[Pugger]

...but this thread is ridiculous.

C'mon Pugger: ty & I already argued this out and concluded that this thread sucks. However it does taste great and allegedly is less filling as well.

I guess I was being redundant.

[Partial]

CAPS

Lying the Partial way:

You should read the PI articles. Bob McGinn had scouts break down every single play the Packer ran over a series of a games and they concluded that Jennings is just about always open and they run almost all west coast stuff, not just the deep ball.

1. One scout
2. Scout said he only WATCHED one game. But, if he was doing due diligence for his team he would break down 4.
3. Wasn't a scout..was an assistant coach.
4. Didn't say he was always open. Just that he saw him open.
5. Coach was a DB coach.

ONE SCOUT IS A SET OF SCOUTS. IT'S A SET OF ONE.

ONE GAME IS A SET OF GAMES. IT'S A SET OF ONE.

IT WAS AN ASSISTANT COACH, YOU'RE CORRECT. MY BAD :-/

This was the overhead game footage that teams get. Not television footage.

Scout said that Rodgers never throws over the middle, something I was saying all of last year. Scouts said he is late in making his decisions, something I was saying all of last year.

1. Scout said nothing about middle at all.
2. Nothing in the article said anything about the type of film being watched.
3. Scout said this about Arod:


"Both," the coach said. "They run typical West Coast routes. Up the field, hitches. Other than their protection, they're an NFL offense. But their protection is absolutely glaring. 

I DIDN'T MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT FILM BEING WATCHED. YOU'RE RIGHT THOUGH, THAT WAS A CHAT I BELIEVE WHERE MCGINN MENTIONED AROD NOT USING MIDDLE OF THE FIELD FROM A SCOUT. I APOLOGIZE FOR THE CONFUSION.


"That line is pathetic. They never get a chance to do anything. Shoot, those guys cannot block. Those guys block the wrong guys. They don't block guys sometimes. How can you not block Jared Allen?" 

"I don't know who their plays are called for. Probably Driver more. But the thing is, the quarterback just doesn't have time. Nothing wrong other than the quarterback getting hit every other play." 

Coach said nothing about Arod holding onto the ball too long. NOTHING. Not saying that he doesn't, but a professional coach..one that PARTIAL is using to make points..didnt' even bring it up.

Folks, this is Partial. When you read him, keep this post in mind. Realize that he lies and has no ethics or he just is plain dumb and can't comprehend. Ty chooses not to believe he is dumb. Ty knows he lies.

TY, WE'RE NOT ALL PERFECT LIKE YOU BRO. I READ A LOT OF ARTICLES AND OCCASIONALLY GET THEM MINGLED UP. BIG DEAL.

ARE YOU TELLING ME WE CANNOT FIND 5+ ARTICLES TALKING ABOUT AROD HOLDING ONTO THE BALL TOO LONG?!? EVEN MCCARTHY HAS ACKNOWLEDGED IT.

IT DOESN'T TAKE A GENIUS OR AN ASSISTANT COACH TO SEE THAT.

[gex]

maybe its a non issue to you, and thats great, but to me and a couple other people it might be. Is that ok with you? That others might have a different opinion on the matter? Is it really a big deal to you or SC that some discuss it, that our QB might be changing before our eyes? It shouldnt hurt your feelings, if you dont like it, simply dont read it or dont reply to it. Not that hard.

Start your own board if you want to censor replies.

The rest of us here have a right to respond to trolling.

Actually, he make a good point here SC.
Its a differing opinion and you guys just cant have posters with different opinions now, can you?

Admin... take a look at the paragraph above and you will see why new people wont post here.

[Scott Campbell]

maybe its a non issue to you, and thats great, but to me and a couple other people it might be. Is that ok with you? That others might have a different opinion on the matter? Is it really a big deal to you or SC that some discuss it, that our QB might be changing before our eyes? It shouldnt hurt your feelings, if you dont like it, simply dont read it or dont reply to it. Not that hard.

Start your own board if you want to censor replies.

The rest of us here have a right to respond to trolling.

Actually, he make a good point here SC.
Its a differing opinion and you guys just cant have posters with different opinions now, can you?

Admin... take a look at the paragraph above and you will see why new people wont post here.

Paco isn't new. He got banned and made a new account.

And how many of "us guys" are you crying about to the Admin? How bout you quit whining and make a football post? Joe asked us not to crap on the football threads, and out of respect for him and the others on this forum, I've previously been ignoring your crying. How bout you keep your I HATE SCOTT rhetoric in the Romper Room or PM.

Make a football post gex.