Ok, my bad. The official ran into the receiver. And a penalty negates a pick....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Thursday Night Football
Collapse
X
-
See but I think he is a winner.Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by PartialCutler is a good QB he just doesn't have the receivers. I think I'd still like him over ARod. His #1 would be #5 on the Pack when healthy.
Cutler had a losing record in Denver. He's not a winner.
Comment
-
How bout in Denver? He had arguably a top 5-10 receiving corps...Originally posted by PartialCutler is a good QB he just doesn't have the receivers. I think I'd still like him over ARod. His #1 would be #5 on the Pack when healthy.
Partial your so biased, I bet you pray to god at night for A-Rod to fail because god for bid he does good your going to be pretty screwed... Its his 2nd year and you give the guy no chance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott CampbellOriginally posted by PartialCutler is a good QB he just doesn't have the receivers. I think I'd still like him over ARod. His #1 would be #5 on the Pack when healthy.
Cutler had a losing record in Denver. He's not a winner.
Brian Urlacher thinks he's a pussy.
Comment
-
It's his 5th year. Is a guy not a vet if he sits for 12 years before he plays?Originally posted by packers11How bout in Denver? He had arguably a top 5-10 receiving corps...Originally posted by PartialCutler is a good QB he just doesn't have the receivers. I think I'd still like him over ARod. His #1 would be #5 on the Pack when healthy.
Partial your so biased, I bet you pray to god at night for A-Rod to fail because god for bid he does good your going to be pretty screwed... Its his 2nd year and you give the guy no chance.
Cutler had success last year going 8-4 until the team fell apart and he was partially to blame for that. He has had his ups and downs. Aaron finally has eclipsed the 8 win mark this year... Last year they beat Atlanta, the Jets, SD.. They beat some good teams.
He has been in the league less time than ARod, is in a new offensive system, and has WAY less talent around him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PartialIt's his 5th year. Is a guy not a vet if he sits for 12 years before he plays?Originally posted by packers11How bout in Denver? He had arguably a top 5-10 receiving corps...Originally posted by PartialCutler is a good QB he just doesn't have the receivers. I think I'd still like him over ARod. His #1 would be #5 on the Pack when healthy.
Partial your so biased, I bet you pray to god at night for A-Rod to fail because god for bid he does good your going to be pretty screwed... Its his 2nd year and you give the guy no chance.
Cutler had success last year going 8-4 until the team fell apart and he was partially to blame for that. He has had his ups and downs. Aaron finally has eclipsed the 8 win mark this year... Last year they beat Atlanta, the Jets, SD.. They beat some good teams.
He has been in the league less time than ARod, is in a new offensive system, and has WAY less talent around him.
Cutler is older than Rodgers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MJZiggyWait I thought all losses were on the QB. He should have found a way to win those games. Good QBs do that.
Aaron was single-handedly responsible for the loss to the Bucs, but Jay Cutler was partially responsible for the Broncos fading down the stretch. It all makes perfect sense.
Comment



Comment