Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Holmgren meets with Browns for 2d day

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Patler
    I read an interesting article about why Holmgren failed as GM & coach in Seattle. The article stated that Holmgren refused to delegate authority on anything, he tried to control and decide everything, including the most insignificant things that even a GM-only would delegate to others. As a result, he simply couldn't do everything, and things become delayed, not completed thoroughly, or decided on too little input.

    The article suggested that as he got older he changed even in his approach to coaching, and being "fired" as GM was a real awakening for him about his own limitations. He was willing to delegate more and more to his coordinators and assistant coaches. They felt his interest in being a GM was in roster development, player procurement; and that he would delegate much of the other stuff to people with other skills. In short, he would be more Wolf-like in his approach the next time around.
    Any chance you got a link?
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by pbmax
      Originally posted by cheesner
      Originally posted by sheepshead
      The guy was a terrible GM and a highly overrated head coach. He thinks he's Bill Parcels...he's not!
      I am with you on this one Sheep. Seattle started declining as soon as Thompson left. Poor drafting, poor FA acquisition and poor trading (a 1st for a NE WR whose name escapes me)
      Everyone knows that Ruskell's key free agent signings were the reason the Seahawks made it to the Super Bowl, not Thompson's 25 year plan. Please keep your narratives straight. Success by Thompson is always accidental and the result of other forces.
      If only we had gotten Canty and traded 3 of our draft picks for Peppers Maybe we would be 5-8.
      "I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious." - Vince Lombardi

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by pbmax
        Originally posted by Patler
        I read an interesting article about why Holmgren failed as GM & coach in Seattle. The article stated that Holmgren refused to delegate authority on anything, he tried to control and decide everything, including the most insignificant things that even a GM-only would delegate to others. As a result, he simply couldn't do everything, and things become delayed, not completed thoroughly, or decided on too little input.

        The article suggested that as he got older he changed even in his approach to coaching, and being "fired" as GM was a real awakening for him about his own limitations. He was willing to delegate more and more to his coordinators and assistant coaches. They felt his interest in being a GM was in roster development, player procurement; and that he would delegate much of the other stuff to people with other skills. In short, he would be more Wolf-like in his approach the next time around.
        Any chance you got a link?
        Not off hand, but I will look for it. It was a week or so ago, about the time Seattle opened up.

        Comment


        • #19
          So if I'm understanding all this correctly he doesn't really want to be a GM - he wants to be the president of a team, like Murphy with the Packers is?

          To me, that would be boring. Revenue streams and all that crap. I think being GM would be much more interesting. Hours and hours and hours of film. Hours and hours and hours of meetings with scouts....and coaches. Hours and hours and hours with your chief negotiator.

          Wait. I think I'd like to be the third string quarterback.
          "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

          KYPack

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Fritz
            So if I'm understanding all this correctly he doesn't really want to be a GM - he wants to be the president of a team, like Murphy with the Packers is?

            To me, that would be boring. Revenue streams and all that crap. I think being GM would be much more interesting. Hours and hours and hours of film. Hours and hours and hours of meetings with scouts....and coaches. Hours and hours and hours with your chief negotiator.

            Wait. I think I'd like to be the third string quarterback.
            I think he wants to hire a GM like Parcells did, or at least two powerful personnel people (pro and college). Given that its Holmgren and that he is ambitious and confident, I wouldn't be surprised if he wanted a to get a foot in the door of administration as well.
            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by pbmax
              Originally posted by MJZiggy
              What for????? I mean...Cleveland?
              What's wrong with Cleveland?
              It's cold and he's retired. He could worm his way in at Tampa, or maybe get Jacksonville some attention--heaven knows they need it.

              What happened to the coffee shop he and the missus were going to open?
              "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

              Comment


              • #22
                I guess getting an earful from Bernie Kosar every Monday looked like more fun.
                Lombardi told Starr to "Run it, and let's get the hell out of here!" - 'Ice Bowl' December 31, 1967

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Fritz
                  I think being GM would be much more interesting. Hours and hours and hours of film. Hours and hours and hours of meetings with scouts....and coaches. Hours and hours and hours with your chief negotiator.
                  What?!?!?!? 30 mins per week on Packerrats and your good. Think of all the $ he can save on scouts.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Holmgren probably thinks he's going to be in charge of the Cleveland brownies distribution. He's just looking forward to all the free desserts.
                    All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      looks like the browns have offered him a front office job paying between 8 and 10 million a year to do what parcells does

                      they say if he's hired, he'll bring in a gm and get rid of mangina, and maybe bring in a coach from his own tree

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by MJZiggy
                        Originally posted by pbmax
                        Originally posted by MJZiggy
                        What for????? I mean...Cleveland?
                        What's wrong with Cleveland?
                        It's cold and he's retired. He could worm his way in at Tampa, or maybe get Jacksonville some attention--heaven knows they need it.

                        What happened to the coffee shop he and the missus were going to open?
                        This assumes that he really wants to be retired. What he seems to want is another job outside of head coach.
                        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by red
                          looks like the browns have offered him a front office job paying between 8 and 10 million a year to do what parcells does

                          they say if he's hired, he'll bring in a gm and get rid of mangina, and maybe bring in a coach from his own tree
                          Ray Rhodes is not high on that list

                          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Poor Gary gets all the abuse...
                            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by pbmax
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy
                              What for????? I mean...Cleveland?
                              What's wrong with Cleveland?
                              Cleveland ROCKS!!!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Patler
                                I read an interesting article about why Holmgren failed as GM & coach in Seattle. The article stated that Holmgren refused to delegate authority on anything, he tried to control and decide everything, including the most insignificant things that even a GM-only would delegate to others. As a result, he simply couldn't do everything, and things become delayed, not completed thoroughly, or decided on too little input.

                                The article suggested that as he got older he changed even in his approach to coaching, and being "fired" as GM was a real awakening for him about his own limitations. He was willing to delegate more and more to his coordinators and assistant coaches. They felt his interest in being a GM was in roster development, player procurement; and that he would delegate much of the other stuff to people with other skills. In short, he would be more Wolf-like in his approach the next time around.
                                That's a hard thing to learn in management. Sometimes it takes more time to teach someone to do the job correctly than it does to simply do it yourself. However, if you invest the time into a person who can and will learn, it takes that pressure off in the long run.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X