Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Future of the Green Bay Packers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    It's a bright future:

    Team rankings

    OFFENSE

    Scoring - 7th
    Total Yards - 6th
    Passing Yards - 8th
    Rushing Yards - 15th
    Avg Yards/Rush - 11th
    1st Downs - 6th
    3rd Down % - 3rd
    Time Of Possession - 4th
    Sacks Allowed - 32nd (but improved dramatically the last half of the year)

    DEFENSE

    Scoring - 11th
    Total Yards - 2nd
    Passing Yards - 11th
    Rushing Yards - 2nd
    Avg Yards/Rush - 1st (tied with Baltimore)
    Interceptions - 3rd
    Pass Deflections - 4th
    Sacks - 8th

    This is a good, well-rounded team (too bad our special teams suck) that is still young. We rank in the bottom half of the NFL in just one offensive or defensive category (sacks allowed). We haven't seen this kind of consistency across the stats board in awhile.

    Individually, we have a young QB with a QB rating over 100, a RB that might get 1300 rushing yards, two likely 1000 yard receivers, a TE who might get 700 yards receiving despite missing almost 4 games, a rookie LB with 10 sacks, a corner with 8 interceptions and 4 forced fumbles, and a safety who has 6 interceptions.

    Main Priority: OT, CB
    Lesser Priority: RB, DL, S
    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: The Future of the Green Bay Packers

      Originally posted by Smidgeon
      A simple question: What will it take to put the team in a position to be effective long-term? My list follows below. This isn't a projection list or anything like that. This isn't looking ahead to the draft. This is simply a "what do I see this team has for the future" list after being impressed by the rookie OLBs in Sunday's game.

      Must-Needs:
      * A cornerback because both Woodson and Harris are over 33 and Tramon Williams can only replace one of them.
      * An effective starting WR to take over once DD retires which could be Jordy Nelson or James Jones if either takes a step in the coming offseason or the next season.
      * Two starting offensive tackles.

      It-Would-Be-Nice-To-Haves:
      * A safety to replace Bigby who--while consistent--doesn't appear to be special. He's solid, but good CBs and Nick Collins can hide his or any other safety's similar limitations.
      * A RB who at least forces the opposing defenses to account for him on every play, either as a nasty blitz-picker-upper, a receiving threat, or a shifty homerun running threat. Ryan Grant is serviceable and picks up a lot of yards over the year as an under-average used runner, but I don't think he makes defenses account for him on every play.
      * A kick returner who both is a threat to take it to the house every once in a while, like Blackman, and who isn't going to end up on IR every year, unfortunately unlike Blackman.

      Icing-On-the-Cake:
      * A third CB like Williams has been the last couple seasons and Harris was early in his career. Someone who doesn't embarrass himself on the field in coverage (see Bush, Jarrett.)
      * A stud punter.
      * Another linebacker, just because.

      Notes:
      * The QB, WR depth, interior O-line, TE, LBs, D-line, and FS seem to be set and set with youth. Unlike many here, I like the kicker we currently have. I think he's in a little dry spell, but I also think he'll come out of it stronger.
      Must-Needs:

      I would not even mind trading a 2nd or 3rd round pick for a vetern CB instead of one.

      I don't think reciever is a must-need, would fit more under would be nice to have. With Finley getting better each game he should be the next big time reciever for this offense.

      Also on starting tackles I believe Lang is pretty much a lock at RT. I think they'll end up moving Barbe back to guard before they would Lang. Drafting a LT with our 1st would be a likely choice if playmakers like Spiller are not still around.

      It-Would-Be-Nice-To-Have:

      I believe getting another safety is a bigger need then WR. Bigby is nothing special and we have no depth at either safety position.

      CJ Spiller would answer both the playmaker at RB and KR needs. Hopefully we'll be able to draft him if not maybe Best from Cal.

      Icing-On-the-Cake:

      Agree we do need to bring in another solid corner, hopefully Lee can be that guy next season.

      I could really care less about a punter to be honestly

      We are loaded at LB, not need to add another.

      Comment


      • #18
        PFT agrees:



        Rookie Packers quickly making an impact

        Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on December 23, 2009 8:05 AM ET
        Packers G.M. Ted Thompson experienced one of his career lows on November first when Green Bay lost to Brett Favre's Vikings for a second time. And then lost to the Bucs a week later.

        At 4-4, the Packers faithful was howling for a full scale demolition to the team's front office and coaching staff.

        Since then, the Packers have won five of six games and sit on the doorstep of the playoffs. The howling has quieted down, and it's largely because of one of Thompson's better rookie classes.

        The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel does an instructive breakdown of the group Wednesday. In linebacker Clay Matthews, the team has a Rookie of the Year candidate. He's a prototypical 3-4 outside linebacker.

        Seventh-round pick Brad Jones may start opposite Matthews for the next five years.

        First round defensive tackle B.J. Raji, fourth-round offensive lineman T.J. Lang and fifth-round fullback Quinn Johnson are all contributing and look like future starters.

        Thompson has suffered his share of missteps, especially on the offensive line. But many of his most high profile decisions -- choosing Aaron Rodgers over Brett Favre, signing Charles Woodson, and trading Corey Williams -- look pretty damn good in retrospect.

        Even the move to a 3-4 defense has worked quicker than anyone imagined.

        The Packers roster is far from perfect, but they have as much homegrown young talent as any team in the league. The idea of starting over from scratch seemed as crazy back on November 1 as it does now.

        "When it's third and ten, you can take the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time" Max McGee

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: The Future of the Green Bay Packers

          Originally posted by Brandon494
          I don't think reciever is a must-need, would fit more under would be nice to have. With Finley getting better each game he should be the next big time reciever for this offense.
          I don't think I feel comfortable with just two receiving threats (assuming DD retires or is slowed in the next couple years) in Jennings and Finley. Finley is ascending, but he's ascending as a TE. I'd like to see two 1000 yard receivers and Finley with 800+ on a year to year basis. I want to see another WR that defenses have to account for.
          No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: The Future of the Green Bay Packers

            Originally posted by Brandon494
            It-Would-Be-Nice-To-Have:

            I believe getting another safety is a bigger need then WR. Bigby is nothing special and we have no depth at either safety position.

            CJ Spiller would answer both the playmaker at RB and KR needs. Hopefully we'll be able to draft him if not maybe Best from Cal.

            Icing-On-the-Cake:

            Agree we do need to bring in another solid corner, hopefully Lee can be that guy next season.

            I could really care less about a punter to be honestly

            We are loaded at LB, not need to add another.
            You know, I'm not sure how I glossed over the safety position - seems like at this point in the NFL it's the red-headed stepchild spot. A few years ago it was the TE that no one paid attention to.

            On further reflection, I think it's a pretty big need with this team. I like Bigby, despite his shortcommings, and think the team is a lot better with him out there. But the depth is really bad, probably worse than anywhere else on the team. Those games that he and/or Collins were out really exposed that position.
            --
            Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Guiness
              CB - at this point, no way we can count on Harris's return, or at least that he'll be ready by camp. Lee and Blackmon are unknowns. Unless Underwood really steps up, we need another player there.
              I predict Underwood not only will step up but will be a starter before too long. Tramon and Brandon to take over for Woodson and Al.
              One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
              John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                Originally posted by Guiness
                CB - at this point, no way we can count on Harris's return, or at least that he'll be ready by camp. Lee and Blackmon are unknowns. Unless Underwood really steps up, we need another player there.
                I predict Underwood not only will step up but will be a starter before too long. Tramon and Brandon to take over for Woodson and Al.
                Let's hope so. I also hope that Lee will remain healthy and become a reliable nickel back. But I'd be shocked if the Pack didn't pick up another CB in the draft...
                No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Smidgeon
                  Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                  Originally posted by Guiness
                  CB - at this point, no way we can count on Harris's return, or at least that he'll be ready by camp. Lee and Blackmon are unknowns. Unless Underwood really steps up, we need another player there.
                  I predict Underwood not only will step up but will be a starter before too long. Tramon and Brandon to take over for Woodson and Al.
                  Let's hope so. I also hope that Lee will remain healthy and become a reliable nickel back. But I'd be shocked if the Pack didn't pick up another CB in the draft...
                  They might, but it won't be their top choice. CB's are at a premium in the NFL and a really good one --a starter like Reves -- won't last beyond the top 10 choices.
                  One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                  John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                    Originally posted by Smidgeon
                    Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                    Originally posted by Guiness
                    CB - at this point, no way we can count on Harris's return, or at least that he'll be ready by camp. Lee and Blackmon are unknowns. Unless Underwood really steps up, we need another player there.
                    I predict Underwood not only will step up but will be a starter before too long. Tramon and Brandon to take over for Woodson and Al.
                    Let's hope so. I also hope that Lee will remain healthy and become a reliable nickel back. But I'd be shocked if the Pack didn't pick up another CB in the draft...
                    They might, but it won't be their top choice. CB's are at a premium in the NFL and a really good one --a starter like Reves -- won't last beyond the top 10 choices.
                    Nah. I don't think they'll get a top flight. Depending on what's available, they might go 2nd round again. Or much later. I simply think they'll keep drafting CBs until they get another opposite Williams. The "Spaghetti Against the Wall" Approach.
                    No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Mel Kiper

                      Green Bay Packers (Spring grade: A)

                      I said I loved what this team did with the first two picks, and I'll stand by that. They moved to a 3-4, grabbed two players in B.J. Raji and Clay Matthews that fit Dom Capers' system and have made huge gains. Matthews is a Defensive Rookie of the Year candidate. Brad Jones is a steal in the seventh round. On the whole, four big-time contributors out of one draft on a playoff-caliber team is a lot.

                      Current grade: A
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                        Originally posted by Guiness
                        CB - at this point, no way we can count on Harris's return, or at least that he'll be ready by camp. Lee and Blackmon are unknowns. Unless Underwood really steps up, we need another player there.
                        I predict Underwood not only will step up but will be a starter before too long. Tramon and Brandon to take over for Woodson and Al.
                        Would be nice, and the team should have a chance to get a good look to decide with the games we have left this season. He wasn't active against Pitt, but he should be this week, and in at nickle, which will give the Pack an opportunity to see what he can do when playing a decent amount of snaps.

                        If Bush is in at nickel instead of him by the time week 17 comes around, we should be drafting a CB sooner rather than later.
                        --
                        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Guiness
                          Originally posted by Maxie the Taxi
                          Originally posted by Guiness
                          CB - at this point, no way we can count on Harris's return, or at least that he'll be ready by camp. Lee and Blackmon are unknowns. Unless Underwood really steps up, we need another player there.
                          I predict Underwood not only will step up but will be a starter before too long. Tramon and Brandon to take over for Woodson and Al.
                          Would be nice, and the team should have a chance to get a good look to decide with the games we have left this season. He wasn't active against Pitt, but he should be this week, and in at nickle, which will give the Pack an opportunity to see what he can do when playing a decent amount of snaps.

                          If Bush is in at nickel instead of him by the time week 17 comes around, we should be drafting a CB sooner rather than later.
                          I'm high on Underwood because he's got all the physical tools, has good size and has shown flashes of great play this year. I'm expecting that with the extra seasoning these guys get over a year or two, he'll blossom...maybe not next year, but the year after that.
                          One time Lombardi was disgusted with the team in practice and told them they were going to have to start with the basics. He held up a ball and said: "This is a football." McGee immediately called out, "Stop, coach, you're going too fast," and that gave everyone a laugh.
                          John Maxymuk, Packers By The Numbers

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Green Bay has:

                            1) One of the best young QBs in Rodgers in the NFL
                            2) One of the best young WRs in Jennings in the NFL
                            3) One of the best young TEs in Finley in the NFL
                            4) One of the best young LBs in Matthews in the NFL

                            The future looks very, very bright. Did I miss anyone?

                            EDIT: I am also really starting to like Martin on ST and Brandon Jackson as the 2nd RB.
                            No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X