A good example of the way a GM's longer-term priority can conflict with a coach or a fan's perspective might be Andrew Quarless. Here's a guy that very likely cannot contribute nearly what Spencer Havner could this year. In the short term, you'd get more from Havner. But Quarless has shown some flashed of great ability. If you lose him this year to some other team that will claim him, it's no big deal - this year. The guy is probably going to be inactive most of the season, barring injury.
But TT's got to be looking down the road, too. What if Jermichael Finley gets to the end of his contract and wants out of GB? Or wants more money than GB is willing to pay? If you've kept and developed Quarless, you have a potential replacement, at least. The guy has skill. If you let him go a few years ago for Havner, you've got - well, you've got Havner.
But TT's got to be looking down the road, too. What if Jermichael Finley gets to the end of his contract and wants out of GB? Or wants more money than GB is willing to pay? If you've kept and developed Quarless, you have a potential replacement, at least. The guy has skill. If you let him go a few years ago for Havner, you've got - well, you've got Havner.

Comment