Here's another reason: the Packers ended up playing one of the toughest schedules for all teams finishing .500 or better. By W-L record of opponents, they had the toughest (from ESPN NFCN blog)
By Pro Football Reference's SoS rating (figured on points scored and points allowed), they were 3rd behind the Pats and Jets
As of last week's DVOA, Football Outsiders had them at the 6th hardest schedule for teams at or above .500.
In all of these ranking systems, they had the most difficult schedule in the NFC for teams 8-8 or better.
I have often felt like teams that are successful with tough schedules (NE, Pitt, NYG from '07) fare well in the playoffs. Hopefully that is the case for the 2010 Packers.
Code:
16. Jaguars 8-8 .500 .453 17. Raiders 8-8 .500 .500 18. Chargers 9-7 .563 .457 19. Giants 10-6 .625 .453 20. Buccaneers 10-6 .625 .477 21. Seahawks* 7-9 .438 .484 22. Chiefs* 10-6 .625 .414 23. Colts* 10-6 .625 .473 24. Eagles* 10-6 .625 .492 25. Packers* 10-6 .625 .520 26. Saints* 11-5 .688 .469 27. Bears* 11-5 .688 .473 28. Jets* 11-5 .688 .492 29. Ravens* 12-4 .750 .484 30. Steelers* 12-4 .750 .500 31. Falcons* 13-3 .813 .484 32. Patriots* 14-2 .875 .504
As of last week's DVOA, Football Outsiders had them at the 6th hardest schedule for teams at or above .500.
In all of these ranking systems, they had the most difficult schedule in the NFC for teams 8-8 or better.
I have often felt like teams that are successful with tough schedules (NE, Pitt, NYG from '07) fare well in the playoffs. Hopefully that is the case for the 2010 Packers.


Comment