Originally posted by Tarlam!
View Post
It just doesn't work that way.
I agree that short term, a temporary one year deal could be struck to buy them more time - but they've had this on their plate all last season and well and made little noise until after the season. I fear with a short 1 year extension agreement they would simply put it off yet again, and we'll be back to square one in 2012. The players union isn't even necessarily disagreeing with the NFL and what they want to to do.
18 game schedules? Fine, as longas the money is there to compensate the players. Control on the rookie wage scale? Yup, everyone wants it. better retirment packages and stuff for players - sure, everyone is in agreement. The only thing stopping this for moving forward is the owners continual refusal to open the books. I get it, it's a power play. The revenue is the one thing the owners can hold over the players. If the players knew exactly what each team was making they would have a better understanding of how to proceed, but the owners also want to keep their high profit margins.
Packers we're ananomoly because of our front loaded contracts - I think in a normal year we make what, 15 million+? I imagine that income is similar for other successful teams, and then most likely not very good for teams like minnesota (before the last 2 seasons), redskins, raiders, etc. Chronically bad teams with bad attendence most likely are not doing so hot.
The final straw is agreeing on how the money is to be spread out going forward. Owners wnat it to be the way it was, players just want to see what money is available before agreeing to potentially screw themselves. In the end it's all bad for the fans, because it's millionaires arguing with millionaires, and really us fans don't give a rats ass.
Get back to fucking practice.


Comment