Ray Lewis will be in the Top Ten. He may be in the top 3. Jon Beason will not be in the top 20 because he's #94 already.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Top 100 players running thread
Collapse
X
-
Best in the sense of overall impact would be different than best at their respective position. Stud DL, LT, QB, RB would seem to be premium to me. I'd lean in favor of a few more of those guys.Originally posted by Patler View PostAs it does for the one or two centers who probably made it, the 5 or so TEs and for every other player and every other position.Formerly known as JustinHarrell.
Comment
-
Peter King has his own Top 100 that he's revealing on his MMQB column as the NFL Network does theirs. In his bottom 30 are both Sam Shields and Jermichael Finley. I'm guessing his list will be a lot closer to what we think.
Since active players only voted for a Top 20 and the Network compiled based on that, there are going to be a lot of undeserving people on the list. For example, if everyone thought Nick Collins was a Top 30 player, but only a few thought he was Top 20, he'd be way down the list (like he is) even if he really is considered a Top 30 player.
So definitely a problem with the way they compiled the list.No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.
Comment
-
Where did you find out how they voted? That is a really stupid way to vote.Originally posted by Smidgeon View PostPeter King has his own Top 100 that he's revealing on his MMQB column as the NFL Network does theirs. In his bottom 30 are both Sam Shields and Jermichael Finley. I'm guessing his list will be a lot closer to what we think.
Since active players only voted for a Top 20 and the Network compiled based on that, there are going to be a lot of undeserving people on the list. For example, if everyone thought Nick Collins was a Top 30 player, but only a few thought he was Top 20, he'd be way down the list (like he is) even if he really is considered a Top 30 player.
So definitely a problem with the way they compiled the list.
Comment
-
Peter King explained the process in his column right before he showed his 70-100Originally posted by channtheman View PostWhere did you find out how they voted? That is a really stupid way to vote.No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.
Comment
-
I wouldn't put RB on the list of premium positions. It would be QB, LT, pass rusher, and cover corner. RBs are kind of a dime a dozen. You don't need a good RB to win. It's tough to win without a good QB, pass blocking LT, pass rusher (whether a 4-3 DE or 3-4 OLB), and cover corner. Luckily, we had Rodgers, Clifton, Matthews, and Williams/Woodson/Shields last year.Originally posted by JustinHarrell View PostBest in the sense of overall impact would be different than best at their respective position. Stud DL, LT, QB, RB would seem to be premium to me. I'd lean in favor of a few more of those guys."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Got it. I think it would have made more sense to just have the players vote top 100. Or if they must limit the number because most of the players can't count that high, they should have done top 50. Just going off the top 20 seems like it would be way to easy to leave some good players out and then have what happened with Collins.Originally posted by Smidgeon View PostPeter King explained the process in his column right before he showed his 70-100
Comment
-
Yeah, Top 20 just seems like a bad way to do this since it will underrepresent certain positions. Very few people have a guard, tight end, or defensive tackle listed in their "top 20 players in the entire NFL" and those who do may disagree on which one. Though a lot of people would probably have guys from that position in the 20-50 range.Originally posted by channtheman View PostGot it. I think it would have made more sense to just have the players vote top 100. Or if they must limit the number because most of the players can't count that high, they should have done top 50. Just going off the top 20 seems like it would be way to easy to leave some good players out and then have what happened with Collins.
They should really at least ask for people to rank at least half of the length of the list.</delurk>
Comment
-
-
70: Miles Austin
69: John Abraham
68: Antrel Rolle
67: Brian Waters
66: Richard Seymour
65: Vonta Leach
64: Tamba Hali
63: Cameron Wake
62: Jerod Mayo
61: Brandon Marshall
Assorted Tidbits:
All but two Miami alums in the countdown were coached by Butch Davis
21 players on the list have suited up for 2 or more teams in their careers
Only one FB on the list
No kickers, punters, or longsnappers on the list.
Only one player from the state of Maryland on the list.</delurk>
Comment
-
I'm sorry, but the NFL Network should take some heat for creating a really shitty concept wrapped in a mangled tortilla of WTF?
I call upon Skinbasket, Lord of Foul Invective, to cast an imprecation upon the producers of this disaster.
I saw twenty seconds of one episode and it was Joe Flacco. Joe Flacco.
I'm done caring. The only reason I click on the thread is to fix the cheese icon.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment




Comment