Originally posted by MJZiggy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sharing: Are Grant & Starks really about the same?
Collapse
X
-
Man, I love our RBs - just awesome, blue-collar guys. Starks, Kuhn, Grant & soon Green!PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.
Comment
-
The old Ryan Grant is not coming back, he is up in heaven with God, Timmy.Originally posted by Packers4Glory View PostGrant still is getting into it. I don't think we've seen the best Ryan Grant yet. That will come .
Way back in November 2010 Grant said that he was completely recovered, he was upset that he had been placed on IR. His injury was not devestating. And now Grant has had 6 games to shake off any rust.
What you see is what you get.
Comment
-
I see 4 yards per carry. I saw 4 yards per carry before he got hurt last year too. The only difference I see is that Grant now has another 4+ yard per carry back splitting the carries with him, which means we no longer have a lone workhorse. Well that, and I saw Grant catch a pass and run 9 yards with it today - didn't see that very often in years past.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostThe old Ryan Grant is not coming back, he is up in heaven with God, Timmy.
Way back in November 2010 Grant said that he was completely recovered, he was upset that he had been placed on IR. His injury was not devestating. And now Grant has had 6 games to shake off any rust.
What you see is what you get.
I guess I don't see this rust you speak of. Grant wasn't Adrian Peterson before his ankle got rolled up on last season. What did you see from the 2009 Grant that he hasn't yet shown in 2011 other than the ability to carry the rock 20 times per game?Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow
Comment
-
I don't see that. There was one play last week where STarks stuck with a play fake instead of peeling off. In yesterday's game, Starks rarely had blocking responsibilities, they sent him into the flat.Originally posted by CaptainD View PostI just posted this in the haters thread, Starks keeps messing up in his pass blocking .
Last week, Cliff Crystl and Eric B. watched the game tapes closely and said Starks did a good job pass blocking.
I'm not exactly sure what the truth is. I suspect that fans that repeat "Starks messes up pass blocking" are just parrotting a dubious rumor.
Comment
-
This.Originally posted by CaptainD View PostI just posted this in the haters thread, Starks keeps messing up in his pass blocking . Until such time as he gets that fixed you won't see him full time. He MUST protect #12.
If Starks is the better pass blocker and runner why his he not the starter?Last edited by Pugger; 09-19-2011, 12:38 PM.
Comment
-
That's a damn good question. My guess is that the coaches want to keep both players motivated, and making Grant the honorary starter keeps Starks fighting to prove himself and keeps Grant from feeling unwanted. Might have to do with the egos/personalities/careers of the players.Originally posted by Pugger View PostIf Starks is the better pass blocker and runner why his he not the starter?
Comment
-
Well, After this week, I think Starks is a better running back than Grant. When Grant was the only running back we had, he was a 80 yard a game back. Starks is a 80 yard a game back when he's sharing time.- Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.
Comment

Comment