Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sharing: Are Grant & Starks really about the same?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by McGinn
    There's nothing wrong with Grant. He's running hard and generally getting what's blocked. Now he needs to start making the safety miss.
    I love how McGinn damns Grant with faint praise and then slips the knife in. I want to be an asshole like McGinn when I grow up.

    Comment


    • I must say I thought they'd be about even, but Starks looks considerably better. Grant doesn't look terrible, but he looks average and isn't quite to the form pre-injury. Starks looks like what I saw on his college highlights. I think he was hindered by his injury last year. He still runs too damn upright though. He takes a lot of big hits.
      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

      Comment


      • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
        I must say I thought they'd be about even, but Starks looks considerably better. Grant doesn't look terrible, but he looks average and isn't quite to the form pre-injury. Starks looks like what I saw on his college highlights. I think he was hindered by his injury last year. He still runs too damn upright though. He takes a lot of big hits.
        Six-two always looks upright when the rest of the league is filled with five-ten RBs who resemble fire hydrants.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • Grant looked very good today. Unless the bare's run D is lousy rumors of Grant's demise are premature. I felt bad for Starks. He had a poor day and fumbled the ball.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Packgator View Post
            2011 NFL Leaders

            RB Yards Per Attempt (min. 20 attempts)

            1. Michael Turner.............. 6.9
            2. James Starks ............... 6.8
            3. LeSean McCoy............... 6.6
            4. Fred Jackson................. 6.5
            5. Beanie Wells ................ 5.7
            6. Darren McFadden .......... 5.3
            6. Adrian Peterson .............5.3
            Yeah, that'll change this week......
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Grant's cutbacks were right on today. Maybe he was just rusty.
              I can't run no more
              With that lawless crowd
              While the killers in high places
              Say their prayers out loud
              But they've summoned, they've summoned up
              A thundercloud
              They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Smeefers View Post
                I say they're damn near the same. I think you're going to see either one getting more touches depending on who's hot. We've seen time and again McCarthy run the hot hand (Jones or Jordy) and I have no doubt he'll do the same with this RB tandom. Right now, Starks looks better, but I don't think for a second that Grant doesn't have some serious skills.
                Man I'm good.
                - Once again, adding absolutely nothing to the conversation.

                Comment


                • this is exactly why you don't cut grant. you keep both good running backs and if one has a lousy game there's a chance the other will step up

                  now we just need to learn how to stay with the back with the hot hand during the game

                  Comment


                  • Week 1
                    Grant's (9/40) 4, 5, 10, 3, 4, 2, 8, 3, 1
                    Starks (12/57) 0, 5, 10, (-2), 17, 4, 2, 3, 9, 3, 2, 4.

                    Week 2
                    Grant (6/25) 1, 9, 4, 6, 3, 2
                    Starks (9/85) 6, 8, 1, 14, 40, 0, 6, (-2), 12

                    Week 3
                    Grant (17/92) 13, 2, 9, (-1), 9, 5, 13, 14, 11, 10, (-1), 0, 1, 4, 0, 0, 3 (
                    Starks (11/5) 3, 2, 1, (-1), (-1), 8, (-1), 0, 1, (-5 and fumble), 1

                    Grant - 32 carries for 157 yards
                    Starks - 32 carries for 147 yards
                    Last edited by Patler; 09-25-2011, 08:12 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
                      Grant's cutbacks were right on today. Maybe he was just rusty.
                      Grant has always run well against the bears from my memory. He looked very good today.
                      The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bobblehead View Post
                        Grant has always run well against the bears from my memory. He looked very good today.
                        Agreed. Grant has seemed to run well against two very good run defenses in Chicago and Minnesota. I think no nonsense works against those guys. Hit your hole and get what you can. Starks didn't have a ton of room, but he didn't hit it up their hard. He looked Brandon Jackson.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by red View Post
                          now we just need to learn how to stay with the back with the hot hand during the game
                          QFT. why they changed up the hot hand was beyond me (well, I suppose Grant got winded), but they were only having luck inside and pretty much only with grant.

                          Those continued runs to Starks were classic Stubby calls.
                          "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                          Comment


                          • Grant not only got winded. I think he got injured. Word is that he will be okay but was taken to a Chicago hospital afterwards to take a look at his ribs.
                            "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                              Grant not only got winded. I think he got injured. Word is that he will be okay but was taken to a Chicago hospital afterwards to take a look at his ribs.
                              Fair enough. But Starks wasn't fellin' it and those runs to the outside weren't happening. Maybe just run the T-bone with Starks in there- there are all sorts of options off that formation too.
                              "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                              Comment


                              • Starks is still the 3rd down and shotgun back. Grant doesn't block blitzers much. Both Kuhn and Green practiced it, but not Grant. He isn't playing much on 3rd down.

                                Hot hand is for 1st and 2nd down. 3rd down is like nickel and its a trained personnel grouping; not the hot hand.
                                Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X