Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here we go again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Upnorth View Post
    If they legitimately knew Neal could be done for a good chunk of the season, letting Jenkins go was a mistake. If not, then they may have felt they had the horses to not worry. The real question is how much info was the staff working with at the time of the decision.
    What info could the staff work with at the time of the decision to know that Neal would be miss a big chunk of time due to an injury during preseason practice? They presumably knew the condition of his shoulder and thought that was non-issue, anything else that could happen falls under the category of shit happens.
    2025 Ratpickers champion.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
      the Jenkins cut was questioned in foresight

      it was a mistake regardless of how well Mike NEal does or doesn't play. You need quality depth at DL

      maybe not a "mistake", we don't know that for sure, but certainly a big loss
      Today, they would be better with Jenkins on the roster. Tomorrow, not so certain. His salary, age, injury history, the roster spot and the development of the young D-linemen all factor into the decision.

      Comment


      • #48
        first, Mad is correct - someone's got the timeline wrong if that person thinks Neal's current injury occurred before Jenkins signed with the Eagles.

        And here's another explanation: given a choice between the two, would Thompson rather pay the extra for the oft-injured vet, or pay a whole lot less for the young, rookie-year-injured kid?
        "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

        KYPack

        Comment


        • #49
          The most important thing to remember is that Jenkins (even at a bargain) would have cost the Packers a little over $5/M year. That $5M/year takes up a piece of the pie that Sitton, Finley, Nelson, Matthews, Raji, and Rodgers will get (if/when they extend their contracts). Scratch Sitton because he got a piece of his pie. It's not necessarily whether Jenkins is better than Neal (probably), that Jenkins would stay healthier than Neal (who knows considering Jenkins injury history), or that one of the young guys (Neal, Wynn, Wilson) is or isn't capable of stepping up. I suggest that Thompson didn't want to spend that much money on a 3-4 DE--whose primary role is to take on blockers. He probably figures those are easier to find.

          Now, if you wanted to fault Thompson for not getting a better OLB to pair with Matthews, I can see that. Then again, who was available? Maybe he felt like Zombo and/or Walden would give him that. Who knows. It's not all black and white.
          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Joemailman View Post
            What massive injury history? He played in 46 games in 4 years at Purdue.
            But there were rumors that he had some bruises after games.
            The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Post
              Ya, this is a valid point in general. But D-line is a little like Pop Warner Football - everybody gets to play.

              I think they could have kept 7 D-lineman, or possibly cut CJ Wilson if he didn't get his butt in gear.

              It seems like the pissed-off explanation is unlikely, judging by comments from players. Probably TT made a mistake, but we don't know for sure.
              The axe I am grinding is against the sour grapes brigade - people in this very forum - who insist that the loss of Jenkin's talents are no big deal. No need to name names, the HarveyWallbangers and JustinHarrells of this forum know who they are.
              I'm glad you didn't name names. That kind of stuff is uncalled for. But I recall arguing with the unnamed HarveyWallbangers regarding Jenkins value as well. In the end, I think he was mad that we didn't offer him a nice deal earlier and wouldn't have returned for what he ultimately signed.
              The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                And here's another explanation: given a choice between the two, would Thompson rather pay the extra for the oft-injured vet, or pay a whole lot less for the young, rookie-year-injured kid?
                no need to choose, keep both. Plenty of playing time available at DL. If there is a choice ot be made, it is between Jenkins & CJ Wilson.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                  I don't know, but I bet you remember Mike Flanagan, who came back from a couple injuries to become a very solid starting center for the Packers. In fact, at one point Ron Wolf traded him to Carolina because Wolf was frustrated that Flanagan could not stay on the field (knee surgery, I think) - but Flanagan flunked the physical, was returned to the Packers, and ended up being a solid player for GB.
                  I was at the game where Flanagan got hurt and it happened right in front of us. Just a brutal injury on par with Theisman's or Henderson's. I had to cover my niece's eyes! I doubt anyone really thought he could come back and have the career that he did.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    So'oto is having back pain after trying to practice. Not looking good there.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Don't understand how the guy goes through pre-season like a house on fire, makes the team on a UDFA then can't dress!
                      --
                      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by MadScientist View Post
                        What info could the staff work with at the time of the decision to know that Neal would be miss a big chunk of time due to an injury during preseason practice? They presumably knew the condition of his shoulder and thought that was non-issue, anything else that could happen falls under the category of shit happens.
                        This is exactly my point, so how can someone conclude that letting Jenkins go is a mistake. Like you said, shit happens and it is happening again with so'oto. Lets hope this ends now and doesn't turn out like last year.
                        All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

                        George Orwell

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Justin Harrell, Mike Neal, So'to = three peas in a pod.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            The So'oto thing is worrisome, just as the Neal thing. So now So'oto's back flares up? Jaysus. Ridiculous. And Williams may be out. Are other teams having these same issues, or is this really that "here we go again" thing?

                            I really thought after last year the gods would be with the Pack this year. But maybe not.
                            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                            KYPack

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Gonna put my gynecologist's hat on here for a minute.

                              Neal - his problem was apparently a meniscus tear. Why wait a whole month before giving him an arthoscope? MAybe wait a week to see if it settles down. The scope can precisely identify the problem, doesn't in itself cause much damage, and they can do the surgery if needed.

                              So'oto - man, if it were just a strained muscle, hard to see why it would flair up again just with light activity. This is discouraging.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Where is Justin Harrell when you need him?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X