Cost of the Corps

[Packers4Glory]

I remember thinking if that idiot could just catch the ball he would be good. I now think with JJ if that idiot could just catch the ball he would be good. Before some one pointed it out I never put two and two toghether. That is why I thought it was the best post that day (which I had read). It showed me something that when you look at it might be very very right which I never thought of before then. I( think it is a great comparision.

really not fair considering Nelson dropped more balls than JJ. JJ's were more apparent because like 3 of them were bombs that would have been a TD.

[Upnorth]

really not fair considering Nelson dropped more balls than JJ. JJ's were more apparent because like 3 of them were bombs that would have been a TD.

And were easy catches, just like ferguson's, which was the point. Frustrating to no end when an easy 6 is taken away.

[Packers4Glory]

And were easy catches, just like ferguson's, which was the point. Frustrating to no end when an easy 6 is taken away.

a drop is a drop and Nelson had more of them. Both had about the same number of targets if i remember correctly. Nelson, despite the huge Super Bowl numbers, should have had a lot more yards because of several drops in that game. Rodgers would have had unholy numbers had he caught those balls.

[King Friday]

Once BRETT FAVRE WASN'T HIS QB AF could not play in the NFL.

Fixed. Brett Favre's cannon arm and ability to extend plays with his feet are what made Freeman. Freeman was an average WR in terms of talent and ability IMO. It is not a coincidence that both Freeman and Schroeder just disappeared the minute they left GB. Favre made both look far better than they really were. Freeman did have a clutch factor to him...I'll give him that. He was reliable (compare to a James Jones, who makes you pull your hair out) but I can't see him having anything close to 50 career TDs without an elite QB like Favre in his prime throwing him the ball.