I think questioning whether this guy is as good as or better than that guy in the league is misguided thinking, or at least attempting to oversimplify something that is not that simple. The players are on different teams in different offenses with different opportunities and are asked to do different things at different times in the evolution of the other players on their team.
The reality is that Jordy Nelson is as good as he is right now because he's worked with Rodgers in this this offense for as long as he has. It's about understanding what the coaches and Rodgers want from him and being on the same page making adjustments. Nelson is better now in this offense than most every other receiver would be in this offense now - regardless of his relative talent level - because he has years of experience in working on the nuances of being effective at what they're trying to do.
Same with Starks. Who cares whether he's the 10th or 25th most talented back in the league? The important question is how effective is he in this offense with this team at this time with the opportunities he has and what they're asking him to do relative to the other players on this team - not someone else's. It's far more about execution, and talent isn't the strongest determinant of that at any point in time. The question of whether Deangelo Williams has more or less talent is irrelevant to the question of whether James Starks is as effective as he can be and needs to be given his opportunities and how he fits with what they're trying to accomplish in this offense.
The reality is that Jordy Nelson is as good as he is right now because he's worked with Rodgers in this this offense for as long as he has. It's about understanding what the coaches and Rodgers want from him and being on the same page making adjustments. Nelson is better now in this offense than most every other receiver would be in this offense now - regardless of his relative talent level - because he has years of experience in working on the nuances of being effective at what they're trying to do.
Same with Starks. Who cares whether he's the 10th or 25th most talented back in the league? The important question is how effective is he in this offense with this team at this time with the opportunities he has and what they're asking him to do relative to the other players on this team - not someone else's. It's far more about execution, and talent isn't the strongest determinant of that at any point in time. The question of whether Deangelo Williams has more or less talent is irrelevant to the question of whether James Starks is as effective as he can be and needs to be given his opportunities and how he fits with what they're trying to accomplish in this offense.



Comment