Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If the Packers went 19-0 and Rodgers never played another game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    the real question is, if Tebow never plays another game will he still be elected to the HOF. ESPN would say "YES!"

    Comment


    • #17
      Modern Era QB's (From http://www.profootballhof.com/hof/positions.aspx):

      Troy Aikman 1989-2000
      George Blanda (Also PK) 1949-1958, 1960-1975
      Terry Bradshaw 1970-1983
      Len Dawson 1957-1975
      John Elway 1983-1998
      Dan Fouts 1973-1987
      Otto Graham 1946-1955
      Bob Griese 1967-1980
      Sonny Jurgensen 1957-1974
      Jim Kelly 1986-1996
      Bobby Layne 1948-1962
      Dan Marino 1983-1999
      Joe Montana 1979-1994
      Warren Moon 1984-2000
      Joe Namath 1965-1977
      Bart Starr 1956-1971
      Roger Staubach 1969-1979
      Fran Tarkenton 1961-1978
      Y.A. Tittle 1948-1964
      Johnny Unitas 1956-1973
      Norm Van Brocklin 1949-1960
      Bob Waterfield 1945-1952
      Steve Young 1985-1999

      The commonality above seems to be long-term excellence, but there's no hard criteria for induction that I found in my cursory search.

      Comment


      • #18
        not a qb but gale sayers only played six years. unless they've changed some rule there must not be a career length standard.

        with all his other achievements...i believe the answer to jh's question would be yes.
        Last edited by gbgary; 12-15-2011, 12:01 PM.

        Comment


        • #19
          If Rodgers never played another game after this season I'd be pissed.
          All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

          Comment


          • #20
            Short term dominance and a sb mvp, how is terrel davis these days?

            Personally I hope rodgers plays many more years and never attends a probowl!
            All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

            George Orwell

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by gbgary View Post
              not a qb but gale sayers only played six years. unless they've changed some rule there must not be a career length standard.

              with all his other achievements...i believe the answer to jh's question would be yes.
              Wasn't there an ancient era QB who only had four or so seasons who's in the NFL HOF? I seem to remember something like that tickling my memory, but I can't figure it out.
              No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by sharpe1027 View Post
                Reverse talk. Yoda, is that you? Is Brady secretly Rodger's father?
                Beat me to it sharpie! My exact thought when I read Rand's post! Hahahaha

                Comment


                • #23
                  Someone enlighten me why LeRoy Butler is not in Canton? I never saw him play, obviously, but he is the measuring stick for Safeties in GB. IIRC, he was miffed they gave Collins the 36, fully expecting the Club to retire it.

                  I checked his Wiki Page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeRoy_Butler

                  He had 10-11 seasons with the club. 180 odd games. In my book, he should get in for creating the world famous Lambeau Leap!! What am I missing?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I would think that a QB needs to play for roughly 10 years at a high level to have a realistic shot at the HOF these days.
                    It's such a GOOD feeling...13 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Steve Young had 7 good years. His teams made it to one Super Bowl. If Rodgers put up the numbers he has been for another three years (assuming two Super Bowl titles and an undefeated season), I think he'd be in.
                      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Aikman had around 7 good years also. He was terrible his first few years.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          In the above scenario, Rodgers would get in if he died in a tragedy. But he would not get in if he just retired because he got bored with the game.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Smidgeon View Post
                            Wasn't there an ancient era QB who only had four or so seasons who's in the NFL HOF? I seem to remember something like that tickling my memory, but I can't figure it out.
                            Originally posted by smuggler View Post
                            In the above scenario, Rodgers would get in if he died in a tragedy. But he would not get in if he just retired because he got bored with the game.
                            Seriously, isn't there a QB in the hall of fame that fits this?
                            No longer the member of any fan clubs. I'm tired of jinxing players out of the league and into obscurity.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                              Steve Young had 7 good years. His teams made it to one Super Bowl. If Rodgers put up the numbers he has been for another three years (assuming two Super Bowl titles and an undefeated season), I think he'd be in.
                              Aikman is tougher to argue objectively, but Young was arguable the best QB in the game for 4-5 of those years. 2 years (92 and 94) he was MVP, though this was in the era of every American Legion Hall handing out their own MVP. If Rodgers were to be as dominant from 2010-2014, I can see this.

                              Aikman is in because everyone presumed he could do anything he wished with his physical gifts (luxury of a high round pick) and just happened to play for a run first team. Plus 3 Super Bowl wins. 3 Super Bowl wins is even harder to come by now.
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                19-0 and a league MVP and I think he'll be inching in on it. 4 years sounds really bad though. 5 and a tragedy and he's right on that fence.
                                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X