Originally posted by Joemailman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL GREEN BAY PACKERS VS NY GIGANTES GAMEDAY THREAD - DIVISIONAL ROUND EDITION
Collapse
X
-
I don't agree. Our offense is predicated on precision passing. Manning likes to chuck it up more to his big receivers and let them make plays. I think their receivers have better ball skills on the deep ball. If it's windy, both teams will be playing the run more--which I think will leave corners on an island more. Our receivers are good, but we don't have a guy like Hakeem Nicks. It hurt us in the game in 2007 and helped the Giants. Mainly, Plaxico Burress.Originally posted by denverYooper View PostI still think this helps our defense more than it hurts our offense."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
I'm assuming Green is hurt. Otherwise, it makes little sense.Originally posted by VegasPackFan View PostI'm not so sure on this with the Giants running game looking good."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by mission View PostI'm predicting a big run day to keep the pass rushers honest. They might even run for over 300 yards on the back of John Kuhn and Ryan Grant. Wouldn't be surprised.
Man, that must have been some bong, dude. LOL - 300 yards rushing. 30 more like. Packer will have to score 40+ to win. Packers 42-38, optimistically. Giants 35, Packers 21 realistically. Too much uncertainty/rust in key positions: Clifton, Bulaga, Jennings, Woodson, Williams, Shields, Bishop, all big question marks for this one."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
Dude, that's my 'thing'... Gotta stick with itOriginally posted by mraynrand View PostMan, that must have been some bong, dude. LOL - 300 yards rushing. 30 more like. Packer will have to score 40+ to win. Packers 42-38, optimistically. Giants 35, Packers 21 realistically. Too much uncertainty/rust in key positions: Clifton, Bulaga, Jennings, Woodson, Williams, Shields, Bishop, all big question marks for this one.
hopefully next week I can predict an even more dominating ground game
Comment
-
All bout ball security today and execution. Teams that have lost in the playoffs - lost the turnover battle.
I'm thinking a big 2nd Q for the Pack after coming out a little flat (down 10). Arod goes for 350+ and 3TDs. Peprah and Shields get INTs. Cobb has a few large returns. Jennings has a slow day but Jordy makes up for it.
31-23
PackThe measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
Here's hoping the Pack gets a few calls - like last time vs. Giants.The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have.
Vince Lombardi
"Not really interested in being a spoiler or an underdog. We're the Green Bay Packers." McCarthy.
Comment
-
It's been said that Rodgers is one of the better throwers on windy days because of his arm tools, that he can "slice the ball" however he wants a la Marino. I was just combining that with the "Eli had problems in the old windy stadium" meme that Mad brought up.Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View PostI don't agree. Our offense is predicated on precision passing. Manning likes to chuck it up more to his big receivers and let them make plays. I think their receivers have better ball skills on the deep ball. If it's windy, both teams will be playing the run more--which I think will leave corners on an island more. Our receivers are good, but we don't have a guy like Hakeem Nicks. It hurt us in the game in 2007 and helped the Giants. Mainly, Plaxico Burress.
Plus, a strength of Eli's game is going deep. Physics would seem to favor those throws less. I know Rodgers has those tools in his belt but he's also better at the short and intermediate throws that would seem to be much less affected by wind.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Comment



Comment