Another odd thing I read. You can't give incentive to players for individual game performances - say for INTs/Sacks. My guess - because it would essentially be an unlimited spend - outside the contract and cap.
The writers made it seem like it was part of the ethics of the game.
WTF?
There are TONS of incentive-laden contracts. Peyton allmighty is the classic talk of the heads recently as an option for next year.
I'm certainly not opposed to incentive-laden contracts - nor would I be opposed to a team having a known pool of incentives (part of their cap) that they could designate to motivate players or make up for players having a rock star year and not getting reimbursed.
No Fun League
The writers made it seem like it was part of the ethics of the game.
WTF?
There are TONS of incentive-laden contracts. Peyton allmighty is the classic talk of the heads recently as an option for next year.
I'm certainly not opposed to incentive-laden contracts - nor would I be opposed to a team having a known pool of incentives (part of their cap) that they could designate to motivate players or make up for players having a rock star year and not getting reimbursed.
No Fun League

Comment