Robert Griffin III hasn’t conceded top pick to Luck

[woodbuck27]

That is thie 2012 FA thread; I have a thought as well.
Why don't people irked with that thread just stop reading it ?
If they stop reading that thread and Woody happens to doublepost then they don't even notice
I enjoy the thread content because it allows me to keep up.

I have a distaste for FYI and have been irrated when I read the stuff so I don't go threre. EZ Fix

THANKS 'B'.

[woodbuck27]

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2012/03/colts-irsay-andrew-luck-at-no-1-is-no-sure-thing/1#.T3JBG4408QV

Mar 26, 2012

Colts' Irsay: Andrew Luck at No. 1 is no sure thing.

By Jim Corbett, USA TODAY

Updated 11h 9m ago

[sharpe1027]

That is thie 2012 FA thread; I have a thought as well.
Why don't people irked with that thread just stop reading it ?

Woodbuck posted over 20 different links in this thread alone and I bet it would easily top 100 links on the front page alone. If it was only that one on thread, it would be different. As I said, I just scroll past and ignore his posts so it is not big deal. All I did was at least let woodbuck27 know that his post are a minor inconvenience.

[woodbuck27]

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=jc-cole_jim_irsay_andrew_luck_robert_griffin_draft_032712

Andrew Luck safer pick than Robert Griffin III at No. 1, say NFL coaches and executives

By Jason Cole, Yahoo! Sports 1 hour, 37 minutes ago

[woodbuck27]

Woodbuck posted over 20 different links in this thread alone and I bet it would easily top 100 links on the front page alone. If it was only that one on thread, it would be different. As I said, I just scroll past and ignore his posts so it is not big deal. All I did was at least let woodbuck27 know that his post are a minor inconvenience.

sharpe1027 You and I have gone over this issue of me posting LINKS and that collides with me trying best I can to cover all that's happening right now and over the past 12-14 days and that's been so much and for many NFL fans very exciting stuff.

You and I have IMO conducted this matter with edicate as gentleman. I believe we're cool Packer fan.

Unfortunately if I give you what you desire the material canot possibly go on this forum.

I believe you understand my position and that fact.If you can otherwise enlightem me I'm more than pleased to be open minded and go more your way. I just cannot see that possibility at this time in regards to overall NFL information.

It's very bust now. I 'm sure of that because I've worked my ass off here to submit all I can that's interesting and NFL related over these past two weeks.

Don't worry as I cannot maintain my posted reports for much longer.

I'm not trying for Packerrts Domination or The Packerrats Dominator of the YEAR AWARD.

That 'only' gets you 'a kick in the ass'. Certainly ... ' little respect '. (-:

[sharpe1027]

If you can otherwise enlightem me I'm more than pleased to be open minded and go more your way. I just cannot see that possibility at this time in regards to overall NFL information.

I thought I made it pretty clear so I have my doubts your sincerity. I can click on PTF.com or wikipedia for myself. When others posters provide a link they generally filter through a bunch of articles and only present an article if they found to be of particular interest. You have virtually no filter and often post nothing except the article title and link. All I ask is that you use some common sense intelligence in your selections.

You don't need to bother explaining why you won't change your habits (but I have a hunch that you will anyway). I've heard your reasoning. If that is what you want to do, I won't comment further.

[woodbuck27]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/28/shanahan-raves-about-griffin-as-a-quarterback-and-a-person/

Shanahan raves about Griffin as a quarterback and a person

Posted by Michael David Smith on March 28, 2012, 7:43 PM EDT

[woodbuck27]

I thought I made it pretty clear so I have my doubts your sincerity. I can click on PTF.com or wikipedia for myself. When others posters provide a link they generally filter through a bunch of articles and only present an article if they found to be of particular interest. You have virtually no filter and often post nothing except the article title and link. All I ask is that you use some common sense intelligence in your selections.

You don't need to bother explaining why you won't change your habits (but I have a hunch that you will anyway). I've heard your reasoning. If that is what you want to do, I won't comment further.

WOW ! sharpe1027 ...Do you a) want to grind me out or b) be reasonable Packer fan? You'll waste alot of effort attempting a). You won't waste mine. I'm patient. (-:

PLEASE... READ THE fORUM'S OWNERS STICKY TO US Packerrats RE: BEING CAREFUL NOT TO PLACE THIS fORUM INTO RISK FOR COPYWRITE VIOLATION. Please read that post.

Now STOP ! Try hard to take this advice. With an open mind do not read any more of this post. Read the sticky posted by Mad.

************************************************** *********************************

Have you read Mad's instruction to Forum members RE: postting Articles/Stories? If your still reading this post and do NOT fully understand Mads reqest ...again PLEASE STOP and read the instruction from Mad for a clear understanding. Thanks again.

************************************************** **************************

Now I assume you have read it and understant it as well. Having read Mad's INSTRUCTION to us.

DO YOU BETTER UNDERSTAND MY ATTEMPTS TO STRICTLY ADHERE TO Mad's REQUEST? I trust you do.

In any case.....

I'm trying to work with you here and I hope now you understand why I took the [position I did. look at the beginning of my FA thread. I start out going all hog on that one and did so in absolute error. I knew that method might it a tad easier to copy and paste; to use for whatever, but there is the risk of getting into a scrap RE: Copywrite Violation. I'm certianly trying to be compliant in that regard.

Please it's also OK.... If you can't understand my manner of posting NFL and 'Green Bay Packer Specific' information to be in compliance with the sticky at the top of this football section of Packerrats. Again sometimes I think I might rewrite ' the Book On Patience '.

I'm cool with you Packer fan. We're cool. We're GOOD !!

Please............If your still anoid wil that gain you much. take a few more days to try and get 'just' to understanding my position. Your original one is impossible. Secondly I'm in a good position at this time to be creative for packerrats. My efforts are sincere and unless I learn otherwise by the POWER here .... appreciated.

Thank You. Have a Super day...weekend. (-:

[woodbuck27]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/29/mcnabb-says-robert-griffin-iii-doesnt-fit-with-shanahans-offense/

McNabb says Robert Griffin III doesn’t fit with Shanahans’ offense

Posted by Michael David Smith on March 29, 2012, 10:59 AM EDT


Comment woodbuick27:

Any 'Sour Grapes' there?

[sharpe1027]

Woodbuck, nobody is asking you to lengthen your posts by adding copyright material, that would just make the problem worse. I am asking only that you use the same common sense filtering that other posters seem perfectly capable of doing. That is not impossible. If you still believe that the only "possible" way for you to contribute is to post 20-30 external links in each of multiple different threads, then sobeit.

Sorry to everyone for going back on my promise not to comment further.

[Freak Out]

keep it up woody...just keep it legal. Screw these chumps.....they can always put you on ignore.

[woodbuck27]

keep it up woody...just keep it legal. Screw these chumps.....they can always put you on ignore.

I have 'no real idea' of the full extent of their ire. I cannot change their attitude and attitude's towords me. I have maintained my STRENGTH and NOT visited Romper Room as I do NOT care to know the enemy. I cam well guess who they are anyway. This isn't about my posting style.

This runs much deeper. Posters here just stompin' at the bit to see woodbuck27 fall. It isn't going to happen based in anything resembling fairness at Packerrats.

I TRUST 'the POWERS to BE 'here and not the Kangaroo Court NOT the instigators of 'a Witch Hunt'. Shame on them. (-:

I just come here like I always have and try my damnest to contribute positive. If I can do better I accept any help. It has to be reasonable and serve a certain decent puropse or maintain 'the integrity' of Packerrats.

I've never been one to PANIC when the Lynch Mob mentality is brewing in any Town Hall meeting. I know who has a monopoly on al the ROPE around OUR Packer Home.

I trust that man. THANKS for the positive SUPPORT. I really appreciate your support.

GO PACKERS !

[sharpe1027]

In many years at this site, I don't remember even reading a post in the Romper Room. I thought what I posted was pretty reasonable: feel free to keep posting as you are, but here is my thoughts and preferences, if you don't agree that's fine. Your paranoid accusations seem to show your true colors. I guess it is shame on me for believing you when you said you thought of me as a cool Packer fan.

[woodbuck27]

In many years at this site, I don't remember even reading a post in the Romper Room. I thought what I posted was pretty reasonable: feel free to keep posting as you are, but here is my thoughts and preferences, if you don't agree that's fine. Your paranoid accusations seem to show your true colors. I guess it is shame on me for believing you when you said you thought of me as a cool Packer fan.

'Holy Mackeral Andy' sharpe1027...whoa .... Please.

Read this carefully, PLEASE:

I'm not accusing 'YOU' sharpe1027 ...... of anything, Packer fan.

I post here for the benefit of al members here at Packerrats. I hold no angst, for one single soul at Packerrats, that posts material that I read.

"Your paranoid accusations seem to show your true colors. I guess it is shame on me for believing you when you said you thought of me as a cool Packer fan."

a) I'm not the sort that ever gets paranoid sharpe1027. I respond to any challenge unless that poster is acting impossible for me to go on with. I'm more than fair and a gentleman overall in my posting style. In wear 'no masks' here.

b) Arn't you a 'cool' person as well as a 'cool Packer fan'? I've not seen anything in your posts to inform me differently sharpe1027.

c) Shame on 'YOU'. Why? That feeling sure isn't meant to come from me, in any sense of engaging you as a fellow poster here at Packerrats.

Your innoscent of some things here. things that are beyond my control as I presently understand them. I havn't dealt myself into 'a certain' game'. I'm not even in that particular gaming room. OK (-:

It seems to me from this last post that your not understanding it all anymore than I am sharpe1027.

I'm cool with you Packer fan.

'Water off a ducks back' sharpe1027. (-:

[sharpe1027]

Shame on you Woody for shaming on me.