Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here comes another "GIANT Nightmare"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Here comes another "GIANT Nightmare"

    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

  • #2
    Why is it the Giants have our number ? Hmmmm

    1. Their DL makes our OL their biatch
    2. Their OL makes our DL their biatch

    It seems like no other team.......the NY Giants consistently expose us as being a soft finesse team.

    Anybody see that changing this week ?
    TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes. The Giants are about to get Cobbed.

      Comment


      • #4
        Last year we split with the NYG. They don't dominate us, they just have better timing on when to win. What's the giants injury situation?
        All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force.

        George Orwell

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
          Why is it the Giants have our number ? Hmmmm

          1. Their DL makes our OL their biatch
          2. Their OL makes our DL their biatch

          It seems like no other team.......the NY Giants consistently expose us as being a soft finesse team.

          Anybody see that changing this week ?
          Consistently expose us? We've won the last three regular season games. They've beat us twice in the playoffs and one of those losses was against Favre and a completely different team.

          That said, I don't feel very confident against them.

          Comment


          • #6
            You need to nuetralize their DLine. The Bengals have really good OT's. They shut out Osi and Tuck and the rest of the D was like toilet paper.

            Our OT's can be a sore point, but if Lange and Marshmellow hang in there we can do some good.

            The G-Men have one of the worst secondaries in the NFL.

            That Prince Whatisname is more like a Princess back there.

            We can definitely get 'em if everything clicks into place.

            I'm hoping home cooking makes the difference.

            Comment


            • #7
              Rodgers is 2-1 against the Giants with 10 TDs and 2 interceptions. I don't feel very confident either, but it mainly stems from not having Jennings, Matthews, and Woodson (and Bulaga). I want to play them again in the playoffs--with a healthier team.
              "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                Rodgers is 2-1 against the Giants with 10 TDs and 2 interceptions. I don't feel very confident either, but it mainly stems from not having Jennings, Matthews, and Woodson (and Bulaga). I want to play them again in the playoffs--with a healthier team.
                That would make one of us; I'd rather not see them in the playoffs.

                I'd rather play a better team on turf than the Giants
                TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                  Why is it the Giants have our number ? Hmmmm

                  1. Their DL makes our OL their biatch
                  2. Their OL makes our DL their biatch

                  It seems like no other team.......the NY Giants consistently expose us as being a soft finesse team.
                  Anybody see that changing this week ?
                  .................................................. ........
                  Your comment is already pinned to the Packers clubhouse bulletin board and will prove to be the key to a GB win Sunday.
                  Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bretsky View Post
                    Why is it the Giants have our number ? Hmmmm

                    1. Their DL makes our OL their biatch
                    2. Their OL makes our DL their biatch

                    It seems like no other team.......the NY Giants consistently expose us as being a soft finesse team.

                    Anybody see that changing this week ?
                    Good God. Did you know that the Green Bay Packers have made the playoffs 3 years in a row? Did you know they've won a Super Bowl more recently than your beloved New England Patriots? Did you know their record is something like 36 - 11 the last 2.5 years?

                    Ah, what a soft, finesse team. What a worrisome time to be a Packer fan.
                    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                    KYPack

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Over on footballsfuture the Giant fans don't sound all that confident about beating us. Evidently their defense hasn't been all that stellar so far this season. But didn't they beat up the 9ers in SF? I guess because of our patch work quilt O line we are all praying for Rodgers' health and well-being Sunday night.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers View Post
                        Rodgers is 2-1 against the Giants with 10 TDs and 2 interceptions. I don't feel very confident either, but it mainly stems from not having Jennings, Matthews, and Woodson (and Bulaga). I want to play them again in the playoffs--with a healthier team.
                        I missed the news: Is Matthews for certain out this week?
                        "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by mraynrand View Post
                          I missed the news: Is Matthews for certain out this week?
                          Doubtful is what I had heard. I interpret this as he's playing.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I thought I heard he was out...?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Another tough game and I'm going to stick with my M.O. - No way in hell the Packers win this one.

                              Mathews = Doubtful. Pretty much means he won't play. Honestly, not having Mathews won't be the reason the Packers lose against the Giants. Giants are going to be very healthy coming off a bye week, ( I hate playing teams coming off a bye). Nicks will be back. Eli is going to carve up the secondary. The Giants D-line is going to have a field day against this sorry excuse of an o-line. I just hope everyone comes out of this game alive. Packers have no shot - 34 to 17 Giants.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X