Originally posted by rbaloha1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dynasty
Collapse
X
-
I had to look up Turing test. This test apparently measures a machines ability to exhibit human qualities. Extending the notion, what if people had to be able to convince a machine of their humanity? I guess that is why every time I want to do the most mundane thing on the internet I have to read and interpret a word and number whose characters are distorted and broken.
I fail that one pretty regularly and the machine declares me not to be trusted as human.
Half of why I come here is to find out whether or Green Bay can be a league dynasty despite late drafting positions and injuries to key players. The other half of the reason I come here is to hear fellow posters called out as poorly designed annoyance applications.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
I have to do that every time I try to read a Woodbuck post.Originally posted by swede View PostI guess that is why every time I want to do the most mundane thing on the internet I have to read and interpret a word and number whose characters are distorted and broken."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
how do the seahawks do it? bigger and slower -- speak for yourself.Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostYour whole basis was the Packers need bigger players. Wouldn't bigger (and most likely slower) players be more susceptible to scrambles and designed runs to guys like CK?
Please spare me the "Packers just need the Ngata, Wilfork types." There's a reason those are of the best DL of the past 10 years.
Comment
-
poorly designed seems to be working on your feeble mindOriginally posted by swede View PostI had to look up Turing test. This test apparently measures a machines ability to exhibit human qualities. Extending the notion, what if people had to be able to convince a machine of their humanity? I guess that is why every time I want to do the most mundane thing on the internet I have to read and interpret a word and number whose characters are distorted and broken.
I fail that one pretty regularly and the machine declares me not to be trusted as human.
Half of why I come here is to find out whether or Green Bay can be a league dynasty despite late drafting positions and injuries to key players. The other half of the reason I come here is to hear fellow posters called out as poorly designed annoyance applications.
Comment
-
-
-
You could make a trollbot by downloading a troll's response history and running it through an n-gram generator to spew out random sets of phrases that imitate said troll.Originally posted by 3irty1 View PostI'm beginning to think this thread is some kind of social experiment to prove how lousy an internet forum would be if one of the posters was a reactionary that couldn't pass a Turing test. Mad you making robots?

Other good candidate corpus material on which to build trollbot's vocabulary: JSO articles and pretty much any major sports site comments section.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.
Comment
-
impressed by your fake degree analysisOriginally posted by denverYooper View PostYou could make a trollbot by downloading a troll's response history and running it through an n-gram generator to spew out random sets of phrases that imitate said troll.
Other good candidate corpus material on which to build trollbot's vocabulary: JSO articles and pretty much any major sports site comments section.
Comment
-
You used to be a good poster. I'll put flowers on Algernon's grave for you.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Postjust getting started with the soiling. r u joining other imbreded rats for class discussionLast edited by swede; 02-06-2013, 05:29 PM.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
No...that was good.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Postyes. some of the rat posters are failed experiments. btw i know i am setting myself up -- so go for it![QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment


Comment