Originally posted by rbaloha1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dynasty
Collapse
X
-
Really? Let's compare the preferred defensive starters of the Packers and Seahawks. I used the weights listed on ESPN.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View Posthow do the seahawks do it? bigger and slower -- speak for yourself.
Seahawks
DL - Bryant, Branch, Mebane, Clemons. Combined weight 1,213. Average weight 303
LB - Hill, Wagner, Wright. Combined weight 725. Average weight 242
DB - Sherman, Chancellor, Thomas, Browner. Combined weight 850. Average weight 213
Packers
DL - Pickett, Raji, Wilson. Combined weight 967. Average weight 322
LB - Perry, Hawk, Bishop, CM3. Combined weight 1,005. Average weight 251
DB - Williams, Woodson, Burnett, House. Combined weight 797. Average weight 199
SEA D weighs 2,788 (253 per player). Packer D weighs 2,769 (average weight 252). Only place Seattle is bigger is in the secondary.
If only we can have all of our starters gain a pound each this offseason we will be set
Seattle D was ridiculously healthy all season. Ours was not. I guess they were healthy because their starters weighed so much more. Oh wait...that can't be it.Go PACK
Comment
-
Suggest sending your brilliant analysis to Mcginn.Originally posted by Bossman641 View PostReally? Let's compare the preferred defensive starters of the Packers and Seahawks. I used the weights listed on ESPN.
Seahawks
DL - Bryant, Branch, Mebane, Clemons. Combined weight 1,213. Average weight 303
LB - Hill, Wagner, Wright. Combined weight 725. Average weight 242
DB - Sherman, Chancellor, Thomas, Browner. Combined weight 850. Average weight 213
Packers
DL - Pickett, Raji, Wilson. Combined weight 967. Average weight 322
LB - Perry, Hawk, Bishop, CM3. Combined weight 1,005. Average weight 251
DB - Williams, Woodson, Burnett, House. Combined weight 797. Average weight 199
SEA D weighs 2,788 (253 per player). Packer D weighs 2,769 (average weight 252). Only place Seattle is bigger is in the secondary.
If only we can have all of our starters gain a pound each this offseason we will be set
Seattle D was ridiculously healthy all season. Ours was not. I guess they were healthy because their starters weighed so much more. Oh wait...that can't be it.
Interesting you included Bishop and Perry in your stuff. What about Moses, Walden, Smith and Jennings?
Keep reaching for the stars.
Comment
-
Can you read? PREFERRED D starters.Originally posted by rbaloha1 View PostSuggest sending your brilliant analysis to Mcginn.
Interesting you included Bishop and Perry in your stuff. What about Moses, Walden, Smith and Jennings?
Keep reaching for the stars.
Earlier in the thread you said the Packer injury problems were because they were smaller. Hence, I used the starters.Go PACK
Comment
-
preferred starters. pay attention, ideologueOriginally posted by rbaloha1 View PostSuggest sending your brilliant analysis to Mcginn.
Interesting you included Bishop and Perry in your stuff. What about Moses, Walden, Smith and Jennings?
Keep reaching for the stars."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
-
Weight is not the determining factor in SB trophies.
If it were, there would be a race to sign the fattest people on Earth. Then we could have Jillian Michaels weigh them and declare a winner without having to sit through all those terrible games that eat up our Sundays!
It's a copycat league. As soon as most teams go to size/weight, someone like Chip Kelly will come up with a speedy fast tempo team that outruns them. DC's are talking to college coaches now about how to defend the read option and the new wave of QB's going pro -- it won't be such a shock next season.
As much as I enjoy a McGinn opinion, I did feel like he was doing some cherry-picking in the article.
As another poster showed, the SEA D roster weighed less. They have bigger CBs and speedy undersized LBs. It's part of their scheme.
Comment

Comment