Packers Still Too Soft

[woodbuck27]

No shit. That's Snake's life...why the fuck you think I don't post much anymore...lol. We are both into that shit. It's kind of like when your a kid and like Reece's Pieces..and get access to a 2 lb. bag of them..you still like them, but then it's not as fun...but still is....I dunno. Snake has for the life of me dated hot ass chicks/they are enamored and willing to do whatever..it's fun...but I get bored a bit...thus posting more lately when I have time. My girl is finishing up her school/internships/getting a great job soon for major money so she can buy me a new house....but check out the most hardcore sex shit you can find with the hottest chicks...I've been doing that forever..no bragging...just I do it and always have and will...I get fucking bored with the same chick tho...but been with her longer than most...cuz she can cook...holy shit ya.

As far as the UFC shit...I got bored with that too. I get soooo bored. Snake gets soooooo bored with EVERYTHING. I love the Pack tho...but hey getting back to sports talk...hey for the last 6 years the Packers have been beaten by more physical teams. Physical teams like the Giants/Niners/Ravens have been beating peeps up and winning. Why not invest in some bruisers like Lacy...some lineman..get Jolly back....etc.? I'm happy bout Lacy if he can not get hurt...just need a few big nasty OL and we are set. It's not always about being the fastest or biggest...but just laying some wood and striking fear in mofos. Works with women who run the world....why not the NFL? LMAO.

Man I remember being a kid loving this guy:

Right on Packer fan>>>I'm right there with you.

We just had the draft last week. It takes time to assess the whole nine yards.

Today I'm so happy to say that I believe that Ted Thomson did better than OK. Watered down product or not.

Check the grading for the NFC and this LINK Snake. Now it's being done by some English /British Chapies... but all the same. Jeff and Neil do a decent job of it. This LINK is for their NFC Draft Reviews.

http://www.nfluk.com/opinions/articles/neil-and-jeff%E2%80%99s-nfc-draft-grades

Ted Thompson >>> He's like Sinatra and did it his way.

Today I'm mustering up more faith that it's going to be better. I gernerally take some time to think and inspect anything before I jump all over it. I've never been the Rahh Rahh 'Type Of Fan'. I've never been much of a joiner. I think for myself.

Ohh that part about you and women. I've been there too. Those were wild and crazy days. I've taken a few side paths. Sometimes I walked too far down some. Life's 'only' interesting if you experience it. I'm always experiencing 'my life'.

I love it the way life is now Snake and that's never boreing.

It's all >>> Calm...Cool ... Chilled Out ... Together... Collected...HAPPY. Nothing ever too serious.

[Fritz]

I just couldn't leave well enough alone.

I emailed good ol' Bob McGinn (it was surprisingly easy to find his email address) and asked him where he got the 27th heaviest stat from, if it was his own work or from where as I simply couldn't find it.

He replied back and stated that he got the number from a NFL release at the beginning of the season.

Cool, now I had a starting block to look for it. Couldn't find it on NFL.com and while looking for it on Google I found this article from Bob back in Feb of this year right before the SB. He mentions in it that based on the same report where the Packers are too light at the 27th heaviest overall team in the NFL, that the 49ers are the 26th heaviest team in the NFL.

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/ravens-49ers-show-nfl-is-still-a-big-mans-game-m08je66-189534361.html

He does throw in the caveat that the 49ers have "big wide receivers, the jumbo O-line, large quarterbacks and a big fullback." So he's saying that their offense is really huge. The only 2 positions he doesn't mention are RB and TE as being large. So that must mean that the defense is undersized.

He continues with: "Their D-line isn't unduly heavy but there is the desired height.

Outside linebackers Aldon Smith (6-4, 262) and Ahmad Brooks (6-3, 264) are imposing, inside linebackers NaVorro Bowman (6-0½, 242) and Patrick Willis (6-1, 240) are so good their size doesn't matter, two of the top three cornerbacks stand 6-0½ and the safeties are ordinary size."

So I guess my questions are , how is it that it's such a problem for the Packers to be so light but not the 49ers? And why does he go into such depth to defend the 49ers size and states it's not relevant for the defense?

Looks like Bob got caught with his pants down.

And we all do contradict ourselves and construct narratives to allow ourselves to live in the world and think we're okay - but when you're a journalist and at least paying lip service to the idea of presenting news as having some basis in actual fact, then it's a little less forgivable.

[pbmax]

I just couldn't leave well enough alone.

I emailed good ol' Bob McGinn (it was surprisingly easy to find his email address) and asked him where he got the 27th heaviest stat from, if it was his own work or from where as I simply couldn't find it.

He replied back and stated that he got the number from a NFL release at the beginning of the season.

Cool, now I had a starting block to look for it. Couldn't find it on NFL.com and while looking for it on Google I found this article from Bob back in Feb of this year right before the SB. He mentions in it that based on the same report where the Packers are too light at the 27th heaviest overall team in the NFL, that the 49ers are the 26th heaviest team in the NFL.

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/ravens-49ers-show-nfl-is-still-a-big-mans-game-m08je66-189534361.html

He does throw in the caveat that the 49ers have "big wide receivers, the jumbo O-line, large quarterbacks and a big fullback." So he's saying that their offense is really huge. The only 2 positions he doesn't mention are RB and TE as being large. So that must mean that the defense is undersized.

He continues with: "Their D-line isn't unduly heavy but there is the desired height.

Outside linebackers Aldon Smith (6-4, 262) and Ahmad Brooks (6-3, 264) are imposing, inside linebackers NaVorro Bowman (6-0½, 242) and Patrick Willis (6-1, 240) are so good their size doesn't matter, two of the top three cornerbacks stand 6-0½ and the safeties are ordinary size."

So I guess my questions are , how is it that it's such a problem for the Packers to be so light but not the 49ers? And why does he go into such depth to defend the 49ers size and states it's not relevant for the defense?

I am stunned that the truth turned out to be slightly muddier than the 27th lightest team in the League. Did he mention whether the NFL number was for the entire team or starters only?

[Cheesehead Craig]

I am stunned that the truth turned out to be slightly muddier than the 27th lightest team in the League. Did he mention whether the NFL number was for the entire team or starters only?

Entire team.

[pbmax]

Entire team.

Figures.