Just when I remarked that waiver claims had declined in recent years, 2013 was very active. After a quick review, it looks like 45 players were awarded to 19 teams on Sunday, with the Chiefs and Jaguars each getting 7 players on waiver claims, and the Browns getting 6.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Very active year for waiver claims - 20 by three teams
Collapse
X
-
Maybe the Chiefs, Jags and Browns are picking up sucky players in a effort to be the worst this year.Originally posted by Patler View PostJust when I remarked that waiver claims had declined in recent years, 2013 was very active. After a quick review, it looks like 45 players were awarded to 19 teams on Sunday, with the Chiefs and Jaguars each getting 7 players on waiver claims, and the Browns getting 6.
The Jags want DJ Williams to be their tight end...
[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
-
neither. Overall the Packers just have better players than some teams. That's the main reason the Packers are better, overall.Originally posted by MJZiggy View PostAre they overrating them or are we under valuing them?"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
To clarify, when I said "we" I meant Packerrats posters, not GBPackers.Originally posted by mraynrand View Postneither. Overall the Packers just have better players than some teams. That's the main reason the Packers are better, overall."Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
OK. Wist is undervaluing for sure. Everyone else is all over the map.Originally posted by MJZiggy View PostTo clarify, when I said "we" I meant Packerrats posters, not GBPackers."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-


Comment