Packers to work out Matt Flynn

[red]

Many of us were expecting the team to just sweep him up the minute A-rod went down, but the team didn't do it. It almost seemed like fate that a-rod would go down just days after Matt was released. there are rumors out there that flynn may have something wrong with his elbow

well, here he comes

looks like the pack are gonna bring him in and see first hand if his elbow is ok, if it is, then i would think they would sign him up

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/11/07/packers-plan-to-work-out-matt-flynn/

[red]

from rotoworld

NFL.com's Ian Rapoport reports free agent Matt Flynn will work out for the Packers "at some point soon."

ESPN's Ed Werder reported as much on Wednesday. Werder added that the Pack would sign Flynn "if convinced he's healthy." How Seneca Wallace fares against the Eagles could factor into how aggressively the Packers go after their old No. 2 quarterback.

ESPN's Ed Werder expects the Packers to sign free agent Matt Flynn "if convinced he's healthy."

The Pack passed up a chance to claim Flynn on waivers, but that would have required taking on his (minimum) salary without getting a look at his recent medicals. ESPN Milwaukee reported Tuesday that Green Bay is concerned about Flynn's persistent elbow problems. Flynn had great success as a spot starter for Aaron Rodgers during his time in Green Bay, but has struggled since moving on. If healthy, however, he'd probably be a better bet than Seneca Wallace. Nov 5 - 6:50 PM
Source: Ed Werder on Twitter

[CaptainKickass]

This could be...

A: an indication that Wallace isn't cutting the mustard in his time with the 1st team offense

B: an indication that Rodgers injury or timetable to recovery is more than what has been advertised

C: Both

I'm glad they're at least kicking the tires. I hope Flynn can still play well.

[pittstang5]

A: an indication that Wallace isn't cutting the mustard in his time with the 1st team offense

- My initial fear when I read about this

[Brandon494]

D. We need a backup QB now that our backup is the starter.

[Joemailman]

D. We need a backup QB now that our backup is the starter.

Right. It's more likely they're worried about Tolzien than about Wallace.

[oldbutnotdeadyet]

Or maybe they are listenin to the rats, Flynn has played here before, prolly knows the offense better than both current qbs, and has actually looked good once upon a time. Seems like a no brainer to us old farts...

[KYPack]

Oh God.

We are all starting to think alike.

First, I thought Wallace ain't cutting the mustard, then I figured it might be Tolzien not hacking it.

I also think if Matt doesn't light it up in the work-out, they'll stand pat.

[woodbuck27]

I think this is a smart move and exploring all options is imperitive. It certainly doesn't hurt to give Matt Flynn that tryout and see if he's an upgrade over Taco.

I personally have little faith in what Seneca Wallace brings to the table in terms of being an effective passer. Opposing defenses will eat this little man up if he stays in the pocket.

We need more at QB than what was left after Aaron Rodgers.

GO PACKERS !

[Packers4Glory]

If he's healthy he's a better option than Wallace. Not that our line is great at pass blocking but it's better than Oakland, and our weapons are a thousand times better. He fits here well and would be a backup I felt confident could get me a few wins if needed. Flynn when he did play, really looked like a Rodgers mini-me to my eyes. He played a lot like him.

[denverYooper]

You can file this one under due diligence.

[Pugger]

I find this rather curious. Why did they wait to look at Flynn until after they promoted Tolzien? Was Flynn released before Rodgers got hurt? Could they be looking at Matt as an insurance policy in case Wallace gets hurt or really stinks tomorrow?

[Patler]

I find this rather curious. Why did they wait to look at Flynn until after they promoted Tolzien? Was Flynn released before Rodgers got hurt? Could they be looking at Matt as an insurance policy in case Wallace gets hurt or really stinks tomorrow?

I think that is exactly the reason for it. We shouldn't read too much into this. Flynn left GB looking like he was ready to take over as a starter somewhere. Three teams have dumped him since then. The Packers want to know why, and if he should even be a consideration if they have a need to sign another QB.

[Patler]

Flynn cleared waivers on Tuesday. The Packers could have submitted a claim on Tuesday, or could have brought him in Wednesday or Thursday before elevating Tolzien. I think they waited intentionally, to show Wallace and Tolzien that they are committed to them. However, they do have to have a backup plan as well. If Wallace or Tolzien were to get injured, they need to know who to bring in on short notice.

[run pMc]

You can file this one under due diligence.

Yup. Wallace is short and old and if he gets hurt or sucks against PHI then all that's left is Tolzein, and nobody's seen him play when the games count. Bringing Flynn in for a looksee is a smart contingency plan and doesn't cost them anything. If he looks good they'll keep him on speed dial and since he's cleared waivers he'd probably sign cheap.