Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Banjo: @ Cowboys Aftermath

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Banjo: @ Cowboys Aftermath

    I love this guy: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/64720966/

    DY posted this link elsewhere but I loved this quote about Romo even more than the piece on signing Flynn earlier in the season.

    Romo interception spin control is already in effect: Jason Garrett claims that Romo changed the play that led to the second interception at the line of scrimmage, while tape analysis suggests that Cole Beasley ran his flat route improperly, which resulted in the interception. Other quarterbacks throw interceptions, Romo throws majority decisions with dissenting opinions.
    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

  • #2
    Did they ever start calling holding on whichever 2 or 3 guys were assigned to Daniels in the second half?

    Daniels and Boyd could make for a good time next year on that DL. They're both really frenetic for big guys, not unlike some DL on a certain West Coast team.
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

    Comment


    • #3
      Packers @ Cowboys Win Probability, all the advanced stats the guy does for this game are here: http://live.advancednflstats.com/ind...id1=2013121512


      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by denverYooper View Post
        Did they ever start calling holding on whichever 2 or 3 guys were assigned to Daniels in the second half?

        Daniels and Boyd could make for a good time next year on that DL. They're both really frenetic for big guys, not unlike some DL on a certain West Coast team.
        They did not call much on the O lines all game. I think Sitton's was one of the very few O line penalties.
        Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by pbmax View Post
          Packers @ Cowboys Win Probability, all the advanced stats the guy does for this game are here: http://live.advancednflstats.com/ind...id1=2013121512


          Comment


          • #6
            Ben Fennell ‏@TheXOsOfLife 2m
            #Packers MD Jennings - 32/72 snaps snaps.. Defensive totals when on field: Rushing (11 carries-94yds) Passing (13/19, 156yds, 2TDs)

            Ben Fennell ‏@TheXOsOfLife 2m
            #Packers Sean Richardson-40/72 snaps snaps..Def. totals when onfield: Rushing (7 carries-40yds,TD) Passing (16/29, 202yds, 3INTs, 2 Sacks)
            When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro ~Hunter S.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Article
              Back to the Packers for a moment. If they had signed Matt Flynn the moment the Raiders released him on Oct. 7, they would be closing in on a division title right now. Given the start in the Vikings tie (plus a few more weeks to get re-acclimated to Mike McCarthy's system), Flynn would probably have won that game. Pencil in one more win among the Bears, Eagles or Giants games (the last two were closer than their scores but got out of hand because Scott Tolzien had no chance of engineering comebacks), and the Packers would be 9-5, perhaps with the Bears a game lower in the standings.
              No one is drinking any Matt Flynn Jell-O shots, just as we knew better than to shotgun cans of McCownbrau. All the Packers needed was baseline backup competency in the month between Rodgers' injury and Flynn's readjustment to his role. They did not get that, even though they knew in training camp that the backup situation was a problem. They dragged their feet and let Flynn go to Buffalo for a few weeks. It may have cost them the playoffs.

              Was talking to my dad about exactly this last night and came to the same conclusion. The Packers would very likely be 9-5 if we didn't drag our feet on Matt Flynn when he became available. Very big misstep by TT in this regard.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by channtheman View Post
                Was talking to my dad about exactly this last night and came to the same conclusion. The Packers would very likely be 9-5 if we didn't drag our feet on Matt Flynn when he became available. Very big misstep by TT in this regard.
                Without checking the timeline, wasn't Flynn picked up off the waiver wire at first? I'm not sure he was available to us early on.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Teamcheez1 View Post
                  Without checking the timeline, wasn't Flynn picked up off the waiver wire at first? I'm not sure he was available to us early on.
                  I don't know how a lot of that stuff works. I thought after Oakland cut him he was available to us if we wanted him. Perhaps not though? Pb, Patler?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    After Oakland's Oct 7 release, M3 said of Flynn that he liked his QB room (Rodgers, Wallace, Tolzien). Bills picked up Flynn a week or so later after another injury.

                    Once that injury healed, he got the boot again.
                    Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The Packers should probably sign Sam Shields now, before the price continues to go up.
                      Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by pbmax View Post
                        I love this guy: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/64720966/

                        DY posted this link elsewhere but I loved this quote about Romo even more than the piece on signing Flynn earlier in the season.
                        I read and enjoyed this article and the author's style.

                        That man is overall straight up accurate in how he see's it.

                        I noted all that was pointed at the Green Bay Packers.

                        Maybe on that note this author is worthy of resentment?

                        The MM and TT apologists might contradict this author and 'of course' as they may. To them Senaca Wallace will always be their 'unknown quality'. Seneca Wallace was a rich investment at backup QB compared to what Matt Flynn has cost TT.

                        Why add another thimble of water to the quarter cup?

                        The bottom line and this article/author.... Thanks pbmax.
                        ** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
                        ** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
                        ** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
                        ** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by channtheman View Post
                          I don't know how a lot of that stuff works. I thought after Oakland cut him he was available to us if we wanted him. Perhaps not though? Pb, Patler?
                          He cleared waivers after being released from Oakland - that got anyone signing him after that off the hook for the big contract he was carrying around. Buffalo signed him, I never heard for what, but I assume it was vet minimum. He was released November 4th (I don't think they let him hold a ball in Buffalo) and signed by the Packers Nov 12th. So he was available before the 12th, but the Wallace injury wasn't until the 10th.
                          --
                          Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Veteran presence:

                            Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 15h
                            Tramon on not knowing if clinching INT would be replayed: "The referee was calling for the ball, and I refused to give it to him."
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Number of "That's a pick" Tweets after Tramontana's game clinching INT: 22,372
                              Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X