When did the Green Bay Packers Defense begin it's decline? Specifics and solutions?

[woodbuck27]

Nah Woody.

Zool is pissed because Tank jacked the thread.

The thread title is "When did the Green Bay Packers Defense begin it's decline? Specifics and solutions?"

It's not "Tank hates TT".

You want to like , give Tank a chance.

He's banned.

Like Mission says, when yer banned, yer banned

Enforce that ban or it doesn't mean anything.

Woody, the guy you are trying to help is killing you with his bullshit.

That issue after my support for both sides is no longer my business KY.

I've simply decided that's best.

Have a nice day and weekend.

[Rodgers12]

I agree with Mr. Tank that Woodson would be a better option than Jeron McMillian. He certainly was last year. That being said, neither really belongs on an NFL roster. Woodson might have served well in the Donald Driver role this year as the senior guy keeping the locker room together, but he wanted to play.

Rand, Not sure many folks outside of Oakland have seen a full Raiders game but in Woodbuck's safety thread, Chris Wesseling, NFL expert, states that "Woodson has played better than expected after attracting little interest on the open market."

Not sure what that really means but that doesn't sound like a guy who should be riding the bench.

[Cleft Crusty]

Rand, Not sure many folks outside of Oakland have seen a full Raiders game but in Woodbuck's safety thread, Chris Wesseling, NFL expert, states that "Woodson has played better than expected after attracting little interest on the open market."

Not sure what that really means but that doesn't sound like a guy who should be riding the bench.

I once worked for the Rand Corporation, but otherwise I think you have the wrong guy.

[mraynrand]

Rand....

BRING BLACK DR. JOHN HOLMES, PH.D.!!!

[KYPack]

I once worked for the Rand Corporation, but otherwise I think you have the wrong guy.

I couldn't figure that shit out, either.

[woodbuck27]

Quote Originally Posted by Cleft Crusty View Post

I once worked for the Rand Corporation, but otherwise I think you have the wrong guy.

It's so complicated.

So so ... so complicated. No .... wait !

At times like this we can resort to ....... Boolean Algebra:

Identity Law:

(a) A + A = A

(b) A A = A

Eh!

[mraynrand]

Identity Law:

(a) A + A = A

(b) A A = A

Eh!

This really explains quite a lot.

I couldn't figure that shit out, either.

A is A. A is not B

Perhaps there could be a new law in logic named after wood buck: The law of contradiction.

[woodbuck27]

Profile on San Fran 49ers DC Vic Fangio.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vic_Fangio

Breaking Down The San Francisco 49ers (2011) Defense

By: Latif Masud  @THouseOfSpears on Oct 14 2011, 8:12 PM

http://www.prideofdetroit.com/2011/10/14/2490879/breaking-down-the-san-francisco-49ers-defense

Vic Fangio Profile and The Present as the San Fran 49ers DC:

http://www.49ers.com/team/coaches/Vic-Fangio/4d4f63d7-8abb-4cc0-8efd-0184e6796eb4

Comment woodbuck27:

Video : See 49ers DC Viv Fangio and schemes Vs various opponents . Located on the RHS paging down on the LINK just above.


San Francisco 49ers' Vic Fangio a straight shooter

By: Tim Kawakami ... Mercury News Columnist

Posted: 08/03/2013 04:10:37 PM PDT ... Updated: 08/03/2013 09:50:26 PM PDT

http://www.mercurynews.com/tim-kawakami/ci_23790881/kawakami-san-francisco-49ers-vic-fangio-straight-shooter

GO PACKERS !

[woodbuck27]

This really explains quite a lot.

mraynrand:

For a brief moment there I thought I was reading one of my 'Hells Angels Colllection' books.

Packerrats is an interesting village.

Identity Law:

(a) A + A = A

(b) A A = A


Well 'of course ' it does if applied correctly.

That plus some simple analysis based in observation and some basic intuition.

Do I need to discuss this with you? I don't believe so.

mraynrand...Please don't de-rail this thread.

If you have something of value and clearly focused on the Green Bay Packers defensive issue (s). Anything to add to any attempt we might take to see a solution. Anything 'clearly focused' on the topic of this thread.

We would welcome that.

Otherwise, and specifically anything personal and offensive, isn't welcome here.

Thanks.

[denverYooper]

Quote Originally Posted by Cleft Crusty View Post

I once worked for the Rand Corporation, but otherwise I think you have the wrong guy.

It's so complicated.

So so ... so complicated. No .... wait !

At times like this we can resort to ....... Boolean Algebra:

Identity Law:

(a) A + A = A

(b) A A = A

Eh!

Pretty sure that's Idempotence.

[Rodgers12]

I once worked for the Rand Corporation, but otherwise I think you have the wrong guy.

If you're not Rand, are you Scott Campbell? Campbell seems to have an awful obsession for my internet pal, Woodbuck.

Don't mess with Woody. WB doesn't back down from anything, unlike myself. Me? I don't wanna get into a chick fight with Kentucky.

[KYPack]

If you're not Rand, are you Scott Campbell? Campbell seems to have an awful obsession for my internet pal, Woodbuck.

Don't mess with Woody. WB doesn't back down from anything, unlike myself. Me? I don't wanna get into a chick fight with Kentucky.

What happened to this bullshit?

" I don't make personal attacks b/c I don't get into personal relationships with humble internet posters the world wide web over"

Another lie from the Baby Tanky.

Yeah sure, let's go.

I'd wear your bony ass out.

[Rodgers12]

BRING BLACK DR. JOHN HOLMES, PH.D.!!!

Dr. John Holmes, Ph.D and M.D., is the noted psychiatrist and psychologist at Southern Cal.

According to Dr. Holmes, the infamous poster formerly known as "Tank" was not "trolling" when he posted his rant about the Packers defense in this thread. Instead, Tank was trying to be like his favorite sportswriter of all time, Norman Chad. Psychically and psychologically, Tank's desire to be a poor-man Norman Chad on an internet forum indicates that he regrets going all in with 7-2 off-suits.

Sadly, hockey fans as well as soccer fans, women and men without humor got Norman Chad banned at JSO. His sumptuous articles no longer appear there.

[woodbuck27]

If you're not Rand, are you Scott Campbell? Campbell seems to have an awful obsession for my internet pal, Woodbuck.

Don't mess with Woody. WB doesn't back down from anything, unlike myself. Me? I don't wanna get into a chick fight with Kentucky.

Scott Campbell couldn't imagine posing as Biker Boy in Packer drag.

Scott's more into this style:



I miss that member...and he'll usually pop around when the Packerrats frustration meter gets pumped to the exhaust level.

That's besides the point of this thread.

Please IGNORE any poster that is obviously 'off topic'.

I don't want this thread 'jacked'.

OK !

Thanks.

[Rodgers12]

Please IGNORE any poster that is obviously 'off topic'.

I don't want this thread 'jacked'.

OK !

Thanks.

Yes, lets get back to talking about the Packers' D.