Favre a GRAMPS!

[Joemailman]

???

My name is not Joemailman. My post was not angry. I am not angry at Favre any more. I certainly was, but I am over it now.

Now please respond to my question, thank you. I am just looking for your take on that situation.

At least he didn't mistake you for mraynrand. Woody's been a little incoherent lately.

[Bossman641]

At least he didn't mistake you for mraynrand. Woody's been a little incoherent lately.

Define "lately"

[mraynrand]

Your attitude is simply foolish. Laughable.

See .....watch me laugh at you.

See me laughing ?? No you can't ! Imagine me laughing then Joemailman.

For the sake of all reason grow up Joemailman.

Taking the high road again, I see. How noble.

[mraynrand]

I am just looking for your take on that situation.

Good lord why?

[falco]

Define "lately"

Define "incoherent"

[falco]

When you make it a point to vilify everyone who disagrees you, there's likely to come a time when your numerous "enemies" begin to blur together.

[woodbuck27]

???

My name is not Joemailman. My post was not angry. I am not angry at Favre any more. I certainly was, but I am over it now.

Now please respond to my question, thank you. I am just looking for your take on that situation.

see Post #57...I actually mix your style and Joemailman's style up.

Otherwise I meant no insult.

Enjoy the Super Bowl come back by Denver.

[falco]

Also, why does this board allow editing? When you make _liberal_ use of the edit function, often well after the fact, it makes for further difficulty in following...

[woodbuck27]

When you make it a point to vilify everyone who disagrees you, there's likely to come a time when your numerous "enemies" begin to blur together.

Now there's a member that can explain the TRUE meaning of the word grudge.

You disappear until there's any TROUBLE @ Packerrats. The thing is your often confused. Confused with your incredibly long memory for losing-losing... always losing.

falco ='s GRUDGE .

I'm not wrong am I falco? Now that's not a question that's this:

I'm NOT wrong ... about you.

You could never handle the TRUTH.

[woodbuck27]

Also, why does this board allow editing? When you make _liberal_ use of the edit function, often well after the fact, it makes for further difficulty in following...

Hey we have members like mraynrand that actually would edit "your post"; if that served that members needs to screw anyone. That actually happens.

You havn't a clue. Your prejudices (bias) so STRONG your not creditable.

In terms of one of "your Boys" Vs woodbuck27 (me).

Your not around here enough to understand the dynamic of this falco.

[woodbuck27]

mraynrand...

I put you on IGNORE.

Other than coaching the members here that actually kiss your silly ass, fill your boots.

I've no interest in any exchange with you. The air around you is dead.

How does that read.

[woodbuck27]

Replies: 70 and Views: 359 @ 9:04 PM EST

There's not anything here to really see. Actually that's not true.

Well there' one member that's looking like a pool of once upon a time ...jello.

Get him scraped up off the floor of Packerrats and into the ice box.

[mraynrand]

mraynrand...

I put you on IGNORE.

Other than coaching the members here that actually kiss your silly ass, fill your boots.

I've no interest in any exchange with you. The air around you is dead.

How does that read.

Nasty as usual. Good, put me, put everyone on ignore. And vice versa.

[woodbuck27]

???

My name is not Joemailman. My post was not angry. I am not angry at Favre any more. I certainly was, but I am over it now.

Now please respond to my question, thank you. I am just looking for your take on that situation.

I'm a Canadian..

In Canada we don't get all pissy bent out of shape because a member of a team is traded away and whatever "lights up" the former team down the road. That's how I look at that. TT and Packer fans had to simply be real. What would be ...would be. It was certainly time for Favre to retire or be traded. It was Aaron Rodgers time.

When he got a shot at the Packers there was always the chance with that man's will ... a chance to light up his former team. TT traded him away for the sake of all reality. TT did what he had to do and so did Brett Favre.

It should have shaked out 50/50.

Too many of you fellas had to act all indignant and in my eyes carry on like fools. I was raised to think things out clearly and always be fair. That and fairness has it's limitations ..limits. I've reached mine with a member here today.

You fellas cannot have it both ways. TT traded Brett Favre. We've beat that horse to death here.

Verify this:

It's just my understanding from stuff that I read that TT traded him evidently to the Tampa Bay BUC's . TT informed him it was either the BUCs or Jets. Which would you prefer TT to BrettFavre. Favtre well Tampa bay is close to home.OK then it'll be Tampa bay. A likely hand shake and good bye and good luck and when Favre lands home and Bus Cook is at the airport to meet him. WHAMMO !! No Brett It's thr Jets..You've been traded to the New York Jets.

Favre has to be like SHOCKED !

TT later realized that that wasn't cool or might be embarrassing as Favre would have a shot back at the Packers that season with that trade to Tampa Bay.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2014020200/2013/POST22/seahawks@broncos#menu=highlights&tab=analyze&analyze=boxscore

SEE WEEK 4.

So could Ole TT after informing Favre that he was going to be a Tampa Bay BUC's and without the respect or decency to inform Favre of the difference or that he was "in fact" dealt to the NY Jets for a conditional draft pick.

Couldn't that be a tad annoying.

Your Brett Favre. How do you feel about a sudden change in an agreement. TT should have offered Brett Favre at least that respect but... NO and .....that's our GM.

Nice respect on TT's part Eh ! No. All TT cares all about is TT.

You will realize I am correct.

You will soon get that as a fact. This isn't extraordinary analysis on my part. This prediction shouldn't blow you out of the water.

Open your mind a wee bit. Read to understand NOT what supports your position. Just some fair advice that you may accept for you or NOT because you either have common sense or not.

TT shafted Brett Favre. One day the whole thing might come out. I don't really care if it does or not.

I simply will return to my position way back at what .....post # 3 this thread.

Favre handled himself with as usual total class. The respect he received as the special guest on NFL Super Bowl Morning was obvious and certainly well deserved.

Too many Packerfans don't have the parts to truly appreciate Favre as I and some other very brave to admit it here Packerrats must be because to many Packrrats have treated anyone that remained loyal to Favre less than that member deserves to be treated in terms of his/her will to be loyal. I condemn every Packerrat the has stood right there but now feel some need not to look so bad ass.

I am so happy NOT to be like a lot here. To be FREE to be a loyal person and if anyone here is annoid by that...deal with it inside of yourself. I'll never sell out to lunacy.

[pbmax]

Your post is angry.

Please calm down.

The 'only silly grudge' associate with Brett Favre comes in the form of the likes of you Bossman641 ( I get you mixed up like Joemailman your so much alike) That is so so TRUE.

Bossman641 and Joemailman and holding a grudge VS Brett Favre are like clones. Many more in here at Packerats are also in your Brett Favre dislike to hate . . . grudge club.

Isn't that the TRUTH boys?

Is that clear !?

It's Packer fans like you that should make some more concerted efforts to get over your pettiness.

Grow up as a sports fan. Your attitude is simply foolish. Laughable.

See .....watch me laugh at you.

See me laughing ?? No you can't ! Imagine me laughing then .

For the sake of all reason grow up Bossman641 (Edit).

You know, when you don't actually have an answer to the point raised you can simply not post rather than engage in personal attacks that you claim to abhor.