Tweet
I like signing a backup QB 4 months before opening day much more than signing a backup QB 6 days before opening day.
-
-
QFT...I think the team was playing with fire with the way they handled the backup role the last few years. Harrell got a sniff from the Jets after the Packers released him, but now would seem to be out of luck. I know most teams, save for the Cowboys and perhaps another team I can't think of are willing to pay their backup handsomely, but you have to at least have one be competent, if not well paid. They just needed to bring in Harrell's competition this time last year. At least they took care of the need now. Good to have Flynn back. He's a Packer.Originally posted by Just Jeff View Post"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick MoynihanComment
-
Last year McCarthy and company handled the QB backup situation about as poorly as you could.Originally posted by Just Jeff View Post
Lord knows why they stuck with Harrell for as long as they did. He must have been one of those players who is great in practice but is overwhelmed and sucked in games. By the time they finally figured out GH and Coleman didn't have it there wasn't much to choose from. We'll never know if Wallace could have salvaged a couple of games while Rodgers was out last year. If we recall Flynn wasn't available for a while last year either.
Comment
Comment