Official drink up, it's the Patriots come to Green Bay game day thread

[woodbuck27]

If you want to play the IF game.

If Adams holds on to the slant the Pack goes up 9 and it doesn't matter if Gronk catches the ball or not.

I repeat:

This often is a game of errors and trying to be the team which makes the fewest.

GO PACKERS !

[George Cumby]

Really, I don't think I'm getting enough credit here.

You're on a roll, let's not tempt the Gods.......

[George Cumby]

Rutnstrut was just excitable as the Patriots looked like they might have life again. He tweaked a knee or (likely) an ankle.

How did Rut tweak a knee? Running for a beer?

[George Cumby]

Brady's a whiny bitch! Camera catching him yelling f-bombs on the sidelines as the Packers put the game away.

And when things go well, he's all yelling and shit, like he's trying too hard. I really like Our 12's field demeanor better. Cool, calm and enjoying the moments but not being a Spazz about it.

[HarveyWallbangers]

A bunch of negative nancies in these game day threads.

[woodbuck27]

The Picture of GREATNESS !

[gbgary]

other than a few runs where we had to gang tackle blount i thought it was as complete a game as we've played this year. that was the patriots we pretty much dominated (stats wise), not the carolina panthers. atlanta next. better not be a let down. they torched a very good d yesterday.

[pbmax]

A bunch of negative nancies in these game day threads.

And this was one of the more positive ones.

[Zool]

A bunch of negative nancies in all the threads.

FTFY

Some people love to complain and even more so like to have a public forum. That way the one time in thirty they are correct they point and say "see! that's what I've been talking about all along" while never acknowledging the 29 other wrongs.

That's the way it goes.

[Harlan Huckleby]

If the Packers had lost, the negative nancies would be beating their chests over the koolaide sipping homers.

The Packers won, so so the koolaid sipping homers are taking cheap shots at negative nancies.

[Zool]

If the Packers had lost, the negative nancies would be beating their chests over the koolaide sipping homers.

The Packers won, so so the koolaid sipping homers are taking cheap shots at negative nancies.

Or possibly the bulk of the people who are fans are somewhere in the middle? But I know, that doesn't get you the drama you crave.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Or possibly the bulk of the people who are fans are somewhere in the middle? But I know, that doesn't get you the drama you crave.

If the bulk of people are somewhere in middle, why did you take to soapbox to rail against the negativity of "all the threads"?

And what does the range of opinion have to do with either side beating their chest?

It is not coincidence that "negative nancy" taunts come out after Packer win.

[Zool]

If the bulk of people are somewhere in middle, why did you take to soapbox to rail against the negativity of "all the threads"?

And what does the range of opinion have to do with either side beating their chest?

It is not coincidence that "negative nancy" taunts come out after Packer win.

No and no. I said all the threads and some of the people and I call out negativity all year long. Because you choose to focus now is not my problem.

[Harlan Huckleby]

some of the people and I call out negativity all year long.

I see, you speak for that great bulk in the middle, the reasonable people.

Problem is, the "negative nancies" think they are part of that great bulk of reasonable people. They are the realists. They think you are the "kool aid drinker."

See how name calling works when people disagree?

[HarveyWallbangers]

Drama king