Where is bar set for Lions game?

[Harlan Huckleby]

Can't have too many polls.

[channtheman]

I voted get the W, but I would at least like to see the offense play like we know they can. They haven't put together a really good quarter of offense since the first half of the Atlanta game. Prove you can do anything against a decent D please.

[woodbuck27]

Let's simply win the game.

[Harlan Huckleby]

I voted get the W, but I would at least like to see the offense play like we know they can.

I think Dallas and Seattle have looked a lot better than Detroit lately. I would agree with you if Detroit was hot, but under circumstances I really think pack needs to pull their dicks out and swing them a bit. Maybe a Johnny Football money gesture or two. They need to show that they will run with the big dogs in two weeks.

[MadtownPacker]

I don't like how this poll shows what you picked. Harlan trying to shame you out of voting for what you want.

[Carolina_Packer]

Setting the bar or sitting at a bar...discuss.

[Harlan Huckleby]

I don't like how this poll shows what you picked. Harlan trying to shame you out of voting for what you want.

Timid souls voted for Packers to play not to lose.
Posters with the heart of a champion dared to expect the best.

I didn't have to look, I knew where to find you.

[Pugger]

I voted for just getting the W. You don't get extra credit for showing swagger.

[Zool]

I voted other because Harlan always spells pole wrong when he says "Can't have too many polls."

[mraynrand]

Let's simply win the game.

QFT

[KYPack]

I voted other because Harlan always spells pole wrong when he says "Can't have too many polls."

Post of the day, so far.

[woodbuck27]

Let's simply win the game.

In Pro Sports:

"Swagger puts a bulls eye on your back."

[Harlan Huckleby]

In Pro Sports:

"Swagger puts a bulls eye on your back."

Seattle have been bullies last 4 games or so. I don't think they are losing sleep over swagger bullseye.

Packers have looked like Kings of NFC North. "Good enough, smart enough, and dog-gone-it, people like them." Until they get plastered out west.

any of you losers who are satisfied with the Packers edging-out the sort-of-good Lions on their damn homefield Sunday can kiss my ass. Then my balls - a little lower, please. The Packers have not been playing well enough to just coast into the bye week.

We need to see Super Bowl caliber play!
When do we need it? Sunday!
When do we need it? Sunday!

Sunday! Sunday! Sunday! At Lambeau Field.

[Striker]

Seattle have been bullies last 4 games or so. I don't think they are losing sleep over swagger bullseye.

Packers have looked like Kings of NFC North. "Good enough, smart enough, and dog-gone-it, people like them." Until they get plastered out west.

any of you losers who are satisfied with the Packers edging-out the sort-of-good Lions on their damn homefield Sunday can kiss my ass. Then my balls - a little lower, please. The Packers have not been playing well enough to just coast into the bye week.

We need to see Super Bowl caliber play!
When do we need it? Sunday!
When do we need it? Sunday!

Sunday! Sunday! Sunday! At Lambeau Field.

2009 - Packers smoke the resting Cardinals. Lose in a shootout a week later.
2010 - Packers win a very ugly game against the Bears to claim a Wild Card spot and then roll to the Super Bowl.
2011 - Packers beat the Lions despite Flynn starting. Get blown up by the Giants a week later.
2012 - Packers lose to the Vikings, then beat the Vikings a week later. The 49ers then run all over them.
2013 - Packers win vs. the Bears in thrilling fashion, and then fall to the 49ers on a game winning FG.

Momentum/confidence is important, but that doesn't mean squat if it doesn't carry over. Just win, get the bye, and get everyone healthy and ready to go. 40-0, 40-35, 10-3, doesn't matter how.

You can look at the recent Super Bowl winners and see their uneven performances in December. The Seahawks last year went 2-2 in December and then turned it on for the playoffs. The Ravens went 1-4 in 2012 but still won the Super Bowl. The Giants did go 3-1 in 2009. The Packers were looking great offensively though they did drop the game vs. the Chiefs. The Saints went 2-3 in 2009 (including resting Brees in the final game).

Etc, so on, and so forth.

[pbmax]

Timid souls voted for Packers to play not to lose.
Posters with the heart of a champion dared to expect the best.

I didn't have to look, I knew where to find you.

So that explains your vote in the Pack v Patriots prediction thread?