OFFICIAL PACKER 2006 SEASON PREDICTIONS!

[KYPack]

That 8-8 was about the only thing I predicted (guessed) correctly the whole year!

[GBRulz]

I'm sticking with my original prediction.

9-7 for me

We bring back the Lambeau Mystique and win on the road against the Bears

HA... "bring back the Lambeau Mystique". That's funny

[J-Rok]

Lambeau Mystique?



Really sloppy and done fast. I suck at photoshop; I know.

[GrnBay007]

Really sloppy and done fast. I suck at photoshop; I know.

I like it.

Plus, don't worry....certain members will only notice the boobies anyway. :P

[OS PA]

What b bies?

[oregonpackfan]

Really sloppy and done fast. I suck at photoshop; I know.

I like it.

Plus, don't worry....certain members will only notice the boobies anyway. :P

Certainly I am not one of those members who will notice the...ah...well..she is pretty attractive...

[wist43]

They may have finished 8-8, but they're no better than a 4-12 team in my book...

As bad as the Packers are, the teams they played - especially the last 4 games - were equally pathetic.

Minnesota and Chicago both mailed it in - for different reasons, and Detroit should just be kicked out of the league on general principle.

The 4 game winning streak did nothing more than put lipstick on a pig.

[Joemailman]

Wist picks the Packers to go 4-12. They go 8-8. Wist decides, "I don't care. I still think they're 4-12." I think his talents are being wasted here. He belongs in Washington.

Actually, contrary to popular belief, the Packers did not have one of the easiest schedules in the league. The won/loss percentage of their opponents was .500, ranking 16th. The Packers were a .500 team against a .500 schedule. That's what they are. If they were a 4-12 team, thay would have finished 4-12.

[GBRulz]

man wist, I hope you never get a job working for a suicide hotline !!

[Partial]

Wist picks the Packers to go 4-12. They go 8-8. Wist decides, "I don't care. I still think they're 4-12." I think his talents are being wasted here. He belongs in Washington.

Actually, contrary to popular belief, the Packers did not have one of the easiest schedules in the league. The won/loss percentage of their opponents was .500, ranking 16th. The Packers were a .500 team against a .500 schedule. That's what they are. If they were a 4-12 team, thay would have finished 4-12.

The mailman delivers!!!

[wist43]

The one win out of the last 4 that was a legit win was SF...

Detroit couldn't compete in an intramural flag football league, Minnesota mailed it in by giving Tavarus Jackson his first start, and Chicago had nothing to play for and mailed it in as well...

Detroit gave em all they could handle and Minnesota almost beat em... In fact, receivers were running wide open all over the field in the Minnesota game - had Jackson been able to hit any of them, they would have blown the Packers off the field. I'm not going to hang my hat on any of those wins.

Prior to playing those last 4 games against decidedly weak offenses the Packers were 31st in passing defense, 31st in pts allowed, and what??? 29th in total defense???

And, if I remember correctly, almost everyone of you was bitching up a storm about how pathetic every facet of the organization was... It's amazing how barely beating some pretty pathetic teams has everyone feeling giddy.

I've said they played better, but I'm a realist... you guys are looking at this team thru rose colored glasses.

[RashanGary]

I said between 4-12 and 7-9 last year. I ultimately went with 6-10. This shows that I'm not a hopeless optimist. I just wanted to clarify that for those who think I'm a koolaidaholic.

[retailguy]

I said between 4-12 and 7-9 last year. I ultimately went with 6-10. This shows that I'm not a hopeless optimist. I just wanted to clarify that for those who think I'm a koolaidaholic.

Truthfully, if we were to look back at last season, we'd probably find that the ONLY time you predicted less than 16-0 was after the preseason Cincinnati game.

You are a hopeless kool-aid aholic. AA has meetings for you. After you get off suicide watch during the bye week, they might be able to help you.

[RashanGary]

I was sippin a little magic koolaid after the draft last year. However, when I saw how bad the Oline was in the preseason I quickly backed off that. I was still planning on backing off this years koolaid if the Oline was awfull (which I didn't expect BTW). However, the Oline is holding up quite well in the pass game and should be able to do something similar in the run game once they start the cut blocking.

[falco]

I was sippin a little magic koolaid after the draft last year. However, when I saw how bad the Oline was in the preseason I quickly backed off that. I was still planning on backing off this years koolaid if the Oline was awfull (which I didn't expect BTW). However, the Oline is holding up quite well in the pass game and should be able to do something similar in the run game once they start the cut blocking.

You should write a book on your cut blocking theory and go door to door thumping it.